Well, if job and income growth are just fine, or so the gubmints numbers say, and consumers are digging deeper into savings each month (or so it seems from the monthly personal saving rate), the fundamentals for spending should be a-ok. Even the debt service payment ratio isn't rising drastically, and I believe even fell a wee bit lately.
Of course everybody knows that only a negligible portion of homeowners are spending their home equity via the housing ATM, so it can't be that, no.
And yet consumers are pulling back on spending, evidenced by poor retailer performance and slowing pce spending growth.
So, what exactly could be happening? Hm? Sounds like some part of the above just aint so. Any guesses?
And this is with oceans of easy money still flowing in to Corporate America and $150,000 home loans for $450/mo still being advertised by Quicken Loans.
Doesn't look good IMO.
BTW, Apple and AT&T still can't get my iPhone working after 2 days. Each one defers responsibility for the failure to the other.
Sebastian - where does most of the earnings growth come from if 70% of US GDP is consumer spending? And last I checked, earnings growth posted so far is based on history. Guidance is what matters, and you'll be watching more of it get scaled back soon.
"No worries Bob Brinker claims it is still a good time to be long the market and the housing slowdown is a non-event. LOL"
Listening to CNBC one couldn't but fear for the country. Apparently everyone is in hot water. The Fed is in hot water because it has to show Washington it's tough on mortgages. The SEC is in hot water because it is seen as pro-business and hasn't cracked down enough on hedge funds. The hedge funds are in hot water because they're earning too much in fees. With so much hot water to fall into, it's amazing the market can do its job and maintain its normal drift during years when the yield differential is so much in its favor. If you can get 6% on stocks and profits are growing by 10% a year, that's 16%, and it compares favorably to 5% to most people, and the empirical facts that Tom Downing, Laurel and I report to support this must overcome.
The current rise in stock prices does not indicate a healthy economy. It simply proves that the market is awash in cheap credit resulting from the Fed's increases in the money supply. Consumer spending is a better indicator of the real state of the economy than stocks. When consumer spending drops off; it is a sign of overcapacity, which is deflationary. That means that growth will continue to shrivel because maxed-out workers can no longer purchase the things they are making.
The underlying problem is not simply the Fed's reckless increases to the money supply, but the growing "wealth gap" which is undermining solid economic growth. If wages don't keep pace with productivity; the middle class loses its ability to buy consumer items and the economy slows.
The reason that hasn't happened yet in the US is because of the extraordinary opportunities to expand personal debt. The Fed's low interest rates have created a culture of borrowing which has convinced many people that debt equals wealth. It's not; and the collapse in the housing market will prove how lethal that theory really is.
Since housing market is dead where the money is coming from with such bad savings ? obviously from the stock market for me.
Q1 was amazing for stocks but now things get tight.
Kevin,
Check out further down the page on the Fed stats page- real monetary base growth. It quite frankly sucks. That spells credit contraction in any real sense of the word without further fed juice the market is unsustainable in terms of multiple. The bond market slump is just the first symptom of the fed taking away the punch bowl. Bernanke has to make his bones as an inflation fighter and deflate some of these asset bubbles as a method to distract from the grind of overall commodity inflation working through the production system. Notice the stuff from China has gone up? They are the rock bottom producer, and they now have to raise prices.
Tell me something,
Someday this war's gonna end...
Notice the stuff from China has gone up? They are the rock bottom producer, and they now have to raise prices.
Allen - I'm hearing the same thing from 'insiders' - guys putting plants in China. However the constraint is not workforce (contrary to what we hear) rather it is capital... there isn't enough capital based capacity over there to produce all we want to consume, all Europe wants to consume and then leave some for themselves & other Asians... not at the prices we've all grown accustomed to.
Never fear - more plants are being built as we speak, I know of more than just a couple... Gotta be more than dryfly hears about. But they better hurry - chop, chop - Christmas isn't far off.
FWIW, I am hearing and seeing things that look like the commercial loan market might be busting at the bottom.
I'm beginning to have 80's nightmares.
Sebastian, much of the reported profits are coming from light inventory stocking. This is really noticeable in the stores now, and can only continue for so long. In other words, the profits are coming from sell-off and non-replacement of quantities of retail inventory.
I noticed this late last year in rural chain stores (Target, Walmart) and then this spring it began to be noticeable in the more built-up areas.
Also, watch the casual dining restaurant chains. They are a superb leading indicator on consumer spending.
MaxedOutMama, the WSJ has their survey of economist forecasts out today (taken in mid-June). It's taken as a given: "With consumer spending holding up ..."
The consensus view was 3.1% in Q2. I'm sure that view is being revised downwards this weekend.
I also like to watch the casual dining restaurants. They seemed to stumble last year (like Applebee's, P.F.Chang, EAT "Chili's", Cheesecake Factory, etc.) - but since then they have performed a little better.
I've noticed they have started to underperform again: "Starbucks Corp. ... warn[ed] it might not reach the top of its profit outlook, and restaurant chain Cheesecake Factory Inc.'s ... second-quarter revenue estimate fell below the average analyst forecast.
... Wendy's International Inc.'s ... warned its full-year profit would fall short of Street expectations."
One indicator I am seeing locally is that sales items at the local grocery stores are frequently out of stock. When you walk down the isle and you can tell which items are on sales because there nothing left, somebody has to be on a tight budget. I did not see this happening last year.
I was at Home Depot today to get some painting supplies... as I walked in the door there was a line of stainless steel gas bbqs. Long line too, ran outside the store into the parking lot. Looked like a WWII armada readying for an invasion.
Again - realize this is July 1st in Minnesota - Hell, I'm already thinking about snow blowers not looking to add to my summer stuff.
My guess is half of them don't sell unless HD gives them away... maybe give them away free with a snowblower... I might go for that.
Cal, you can bet those investors don't like sitting on those pins and needles. Now they have to do so for longer. I also can't wait to know how much they have lost!
CR, thanks for your input on casual dining. I always feel as if I'm on the right track if you are watching something too. It has seemed to me that consumer spending has been inversely related to gas prices over the last year and a half. I don't see where all the analysts are getting their optimism on consumer spending.
Dryfly, you cracked me up yet again. The Chinese armada of BBQ grills, defeated by the Divine Wind of Consumer Conservatism!!!
All: I was talking to a contact who lives in the NE tonight. An engineer, makes well over $100,000 K a year, no debt (even has his house paid off). He commented that since his property taxes were due and he was prepaying his heating oil contract in July, he wouldn't have much money to spend for the next two months. I was surprised that his property taxes were so low, but the two bills together came to over 5 grand. He works for a large company and his company is in the process of cutting back, and they haven't received word on raises yet (which were supposed to come in June, I believe).
So then I called a contact in the DC area. A scientist. Same deal (I know this one also makes over $100,000 a year), no debt at all. Tons of money in the bank. I didn't mention the first conversation, but I did ask what the economy looked like and he responded that his company was doing well but he was living very conservatively and putting money back.
It kind of struck me that the higher cost of day-to-day living may be causing a generalized caution. People may have absorbed the idea that prices are just going to keep increasing. Or maybe the spending fad is over? Mass psychology is a real thing. I am pretty sure that both of these men could go out and just pay cash for a new house. I am dead sure they could pay cash for a new car from ready cash. But they don't really NEED either, and at this time it seems they like the idea of more money in the bank. Neither are positive on the stock markets either.
Or maybe it's a techy thing. But what sticks with me is that if those who aren't chocked up with debt aren't spending, in this environment it's unlikely that those with a lot of debt are going to keep spending. The housing ATM does seem to be reluctant to pay out much lately.
Earnings growth is too strong for this to be anything more than a brief and minor slowdown.
I do agree that earnings growth is still strong and economy is a big barge to turn. So Q2 was not a recession yet, sub-1%, but not negative. Q3 will be a recession.
The current rise in stock prices does not indicate a healthy economy. It simply proves that the market is awash in cheap credit resulting from the Fed's increases in the money supply.
Actually Feds are quite tight for a while. The money come from $800b current account deficit. A lot of those routed to consumer pockets and to those profits we saw last quarter.
It's not just a real thing; in so many ways it's the only thing.
I think that's why many economists don't get it.
The one reason we have an economy is because people want to get up in the morning because they believe they have an opportunity to earn dollars that are worth something. The structural aspects are essential, but entirely secondary to the psychological aspects.
Easy money jeopardizes economic integrity from both ends.
BTW, I'm officially going on a hunger strike until my iPhone begins to work.
"It has seemed to me that consumer spending has been inversely related to gas prices over the last year and a half. I don't see where all the analysts are getting their optimism on consumer spending." [MOM]
"It has seemed to me that consumer spending has been inversely related to gas prices over the last year and a half. I don't see where all the analysts are getting their optimism on consumer spending." [MOM]
That's what I've been wondering as well...
They find that optimisim anywhere the can, or they don't get a paycheck.
BTW, I'm officially going on a hunger strike until my iPhone begins to work.
So they refused to exchange a broken phone and you went on hunger strike in front of the Apple store? I suppose I'll see you on TV tomorrow, unless they finally exchange it.
The structural aspects are essential, but entirely secondary to the psychological aspects.
Well, I'm going to disagree (again)... there are two factors in 'demand'... and both are equally important:
1) the desire to buy (psychology)
2) the ability to buy (structural)
The two are NOT additive, rather they are multiplicative. If one goes to 'zed' the other doesn't matter, the demand (product of the two) is also 'zed'.
Most econ folks take for granted that the DESIRE to buy is always there and focus almost entirely on the ability to buy - especially income & ability to finance consumption. Most of the time that is correct.
However, when 'the market' (that would be us) gets spooked, all bets are off as to whether the desire is there... or if there maybe 'deferred'.
That to a great extent is what is happening in Asian societies - no SS, few pensions, no safety net and a long history of hardship... so even though incomes are increasing the population never quite feels safe enough to open the wallet very wide at all.
I think we, here, are a long way from being that spooked... but that's not to say it can't happen. The 1000 mile journey begins with a few small steps.
Optimism...hmm, July 4 is only a few days away, time to invest in fireworks! Just make sure you don't aim them at the overpriced house you are carrying on your back.
So then I called a contact in the DC area. A scientist. Same deal (I know this one also makes over $100,000 a year) It might be a techie thing. For a lot of us, post Y2K were lean times. Now we are back to well over $100K but drive 2 '97 vehicles, three adults living in the $200K house and we are paying down the dot.bust and real estate debt to the tune of $5K/month.
"Earnings growth is too strong for this to be anything more than a brief and minor slowdown"
hhhmmmmm. Beginning to look like you may fail the Turing Test.
I have started to notice quite a few commercial real estate "for lease" signs. They are large and easily noticable and in higher and lower rent parts of town. Still building though, so I guess it is all good.
dryfly- "... as I walked in the door there was a line of stainless steel gas bbqs."
Hey, I saw those things too, and I was impressed. One had a built-in wine cooler (beer fridge). Forget iPhones. I see one of those things in my future, and it is gooood, especially for marshmallows on warm summer nights.
No, no! Some surf and turf action. Some nicely marbled rib eyes smothered in garlic butter with either lobster tails or bacon-wrapped shrimp. Grilled asparagus with home-made hollandaise sauce and buttered new potatoes. A nice spinach salad in a walnut vinaigrette. Fresh strawberries and whipped cream for dessert.
My gutless cardiologist should be gasping for air by now.
mp and MOM -- I'll concur. My casual dining clients are in trouble. Despite my telling them last fall that they would be in such shape right about now, they are still surprised.
Yes, dryfly, but the ability itself stems from the desire, no? The essence of capitalism is to work for what you want. Furthermore, lenders have to have confidence in borrowers, etc. Every boom (and the abilities exercised therein) are the result of collective optimism.
that reminds me.. did'nt PE swoop on part of HD's supplier biz...hmmm
Indeed they did for $10b, and most of that money likely went to share repurchases(likely of the execs). If you can't grow it, reduce the float and get rich that way.
Oddly enough, the HD Supply in Phoenix is closing, and if I didn't know better it seems as if they're going to be a virtual supply house.
Geoff My casual dining clients are in trouble. Despite my telling them last fall that they would be in such shape right about now, they are still surprised.
Yeah, when the science of economics turns dismal, no one wants to hear about it. And, of course, the Fed and the Street was talking about "containment".
Anyhow, dryfly has a point. There is a problem with desire. The ache to buy something, the smoldering, primordial want, can fail. Sadly, failing desire is often a matter of age and experience. If one has learned that the promised extasy of "having" goes unfulfilled, purchase after purchase, one can turn to the joy that Ebenezer knew. One can save, squirrel away the bucks and take joy in their lovely compounding. It is not a joy that many of us grew up knowing, but once discovered - Oh, the bliss! There is Viagra for the lack of desire to purchase, but many of us are becoming marketing-resistant. It is the way of the Scrooge.
Given the level of household debt and debt service, I would not be at all surprised if the vaunted reliability of the US consumer were to fade.
Well, if job and income growth are just fine, or so the gubmints numbers say, and consumers are digging deeper into savings each month (or so it seems from the monthly personal saving rate), the fundamentals for spending should be a-ok. Even the debt service payment ratio isn't rising drastically, and I believe even fell a wee bit lately.
Of course everybody knows that only a negligible portion of homeowners are spending their home equity via the housing ATM, so it can't be that, no.
And yet consumers are pulling back on spending, evidenced by poor retailer performance and slowing pce spending growth.
So, what exactly could be happening? Hm? Sounds like some part of the above just aint so. Any guesses?
And this is with oceans of easy money still flowing in to Corporate America and $150,000 home loans for $450/mo still being advertised by Quicken Loans.
Doesn't look good IMO.
BTW, Apple and AT&T still can't get my iPhone working after 2 days. Each one defers responsibility for the failure to the other.
Comfort me.
No worries Bob Brinker claims it is still a good time to be long the market and the housing slowdown is a non-event. LOL
Earnings growth is too strong for this to be anything more than a brief and minor slowdown.
http://www2.standardandpoors.com/spf/xls/index/SP500EPSEST.XLS
Sebastia
Sebastian - where does most of the earnings growth come from if 70% of US GDP is consumer spending? And last I checked, earnings growth posted so far is based on history. Guidance is what matters, and you'll be watching more of it get scaled back soon.
"No worries Bob Brinker claims it is still a good time to be long the market and the housing slowdown is a non-event. LOL"
Listening to CNBC one couldn't but fear for the country. Apparently everyone is in hot water. The Fed is in hot water because it has to show Washington it's tough on mortgages. The SEC is in hot water because it is seen as pro-business and hasn't cracked down enough on hedge funds. The hedge funds are in hot water because they're earning too much in fees. With so much hot water to fall into, it's amazing the market can do its job and maintain its normal drift during years when the yield differential is so much in its favor. If you can get 6% on stocks and profits are growing by 10% a year, that's 16%, and it compares favorably to 5% to most people, and the empirical facts that Tom Downing, Laurel and I report to support this must overcome.
Daily Speculations
So do the hedgies, at least this one and with MZM is still rocketing from excess money printing and that crap gotta go somewhere.
http://research.stlouisfed.org/publications/mt/page3.pdf
Sebastian - where does most of the earnings growth come from if 70% of US GDP is consumer spending?
I think it's up to 72% now.
The current rise in stock prices does not indicate a healthy economy. It simply proves that the market is awash in cheap credit resulting from the Fed's increases in the money supply. Consumer spending is a better indicator of the real state of the economy than stocks. When consumer spending drops off; it is a sign of overcapacity, which is deflationary. That means that growth will continue to shrivel because maxed-out workers can no longer purchase the things they are making.
The underlying problem is not simply the Fed's reckless increases to the money supply, but the growing "wealth gap" which is undermining solid economic growth. If wages don't keep pace with productivity; the middle class loses its ability to buy consumer items and the economy slows.
The reason that hasn't happened yet in the US is because of the extraordinary opportunities to expand personal debt. The Fed's low interest rates have created a culture of borrowing which has convinced many people that debt equals wealth. It's not; and the collapse in the housing market will prove how lethal that theory really is.
Mike Whitney: The Fed's Role in the Bear Stearns Meltdown
The other side of the coin.
Since housing market is dead where the money is coming from with such bad savings ? obviously from the stock market for me.
Q1 was amazing for stocks but now things get tight.
Q1 was amazing for stocks but now things get tight.
http://www.viewimages.com/Search.aspx?mid=73954691&epmid=1&partner=Yahoo
Maybe Daddy Warbucks will save you.
Kevin,
Check out further down the page on the Fed stats page- real monetary base growth. It quite frankly sucks. That spells credit contraction in any real sense of the word without further fed juice the market is unsustainable in terms of multiple. The bond market slump is just the first symptom of the fed taking away the punch bowl. Bernanke has to make his bones as an inflation fighter and deflate some of these asset bubbles as a method to distract from the grind of overall commodity inflation working through the production system. Notice the stuff from China has gone up? They are the rock bottom producer, and they now have to raise prices.
Tell me something,
Someday this war's gonna end...
Notice the stuff from China has gone up? They are the rock bottom producer, and they now have to raise prices.
Allen - I'm hearing the same thing from 'insiders' - guys putting plants in China. However the constraint is not workforce (contrary to what we hear) rather it is capital... there isn't enough capital based capacity over there to produce all we want to consume, all Europe wants to consume and then leave some for themselves & other Asians... not at the prices we've all grown accustomed to.
Never fear - more plants are being built as we speak, I know of more than just a couple... Gotta be more than dryfly hears about. But they better hurry - chop, chop - Christmas isn't far off.
FWIW, I am hearing and seeing things that look like the commercial loan market might be busting at the bottom.
I'm beginning to have 80's nightmares.
Sebastian, much of the reported profits are coming from light inventory stocking. This is really noticeable in the stores now, and can only continue for so long. In other words, the profits are coming from sell-off and non-replacement of quantities of retail inventory.
I noticed this late last year in rural chain stores (Target, Walmart) and then this spring it began to be noticeable in the more built-up areas.
Also, watch the casual dining restaurant chains. They are a superb leading indicator on consumer spending.
MaxedOutMama, the WSJ has their survey of economist forecasts out today (taken in mid-June). It's taken as a given: "With consumer spending holding up ..."
The consensus view was 3.1% in Q2. I'm sure that view is being revised downwards this weekend.
I also like to watch the casual dining restaurants. They seemed to stumble last year (like Applebee's, P.F.Chang, EAT "Chili's", Cheesecake Factory, etc.) - but since then they have performed a little better.
I've noticed they have started to underperform again: "Starbucks Corp. ... warn[ed] it might not reach the top of its profit outlook, and restaurant chain Cheesecake Factory Inc.'s ... second-quarter revenue estimate fell below the average analyst forecast.
... Wendy's International Inc.'s ... warned its full-year profit would fall short of Street expectations."
Best Wishes.
One indicator I am seeing locally is that sales items at the local grocery stores are frequently out of stock. When you walk down the isle and you can tell which items are on sales because there nothing left, somebody has to be on a tight budget. I did not see this happening last year.
Bear Stearns Investors Await Tally on Losses - WSJ.com
"Bear Stearns Investors
Await Tally on Losses"
More 'means nothing' anecdotal evidence...
I was at Home Depot today to get some painting supplies... as I walked in the door there was a line of stainless steel gas bbqs. Long line too, ran outside the store into the parking lot. Looked like a WWII armada readying for an invasion.
Again - realize this is July 1st in Minnesota - Hell, I'm already thinking about snow blowers not looking to add to my summer stuff.
My guess is half of them don't sell unless HD gives them away... maybe give them away free with a snowblower... I might go for that.
Cal, you can bet those investors don't like sitting on those pins and needles. Now they have to do so for longer. I also can't wait to know how much they have lost!
CR, thanks for your input on casual dining. I always feel as if I'm on the right track if you are watching something too. It has seemed to me that consumer spending has been inversely related to gas prices over the last year and a half. I don't see where all the analysts are getting their optimism on consumer spending.
Dryfly, you cracked me up yet again. The Chinese armada of BBQ grills, defeated by the Divine Wind of Consumer Conservatism!!!
All: I was talking to a contact who lives in the NE tonight. An engineer, makes well over $100,000 K a year, no debt (even has his house paid off). He commented that since his property taxes were due and he was prepaying his heating oil contract in July, he wouldn't have much money to spend for the next two months. I was surprised that his property taxes were so low, but the two bills together came to over 5 grand. He works for a large company and his company is in the process of cutting back, and they haven't received word on raises yet (which were supposed to come in June, I believe).
So then I called a contact in the DC area. A scientist. Same deal (I know this one also makes over $100,000 a year), no debt at all. Tons of money in the bank. I didn't mention the first conversation, but I did ask what the economy looked like and he responded that his company was doing well but he was living very conservatively and putting money back.
It kind of struck me that the higher cost of day-to-day living may be causing a generalized caution. People may have absorbed the idea that prices are just going to keep increasing. Or maybe the spending fad is over? Mass psychology is a real thing. I am pretty sure that both of these men could go out and just pay cash for a new house. I am dead sure they could pay cash for a new car from ready cash. But they don't really NEED either, and at this time it seems they like the idea of more money in the bank. Neither are positive on the stock markets either.
Or maybe it's a techy thing. But what sticks with me is that if those who aren't chocked up with debt aren't spending, in this environment it's unlikely that those with a lot of debt are going to keep spending. The housing ATM does seem to be reluctant to pay out much lately.
Mass psychology is a real thing.
It's not just a real thing; in so many ways it's the only thing.
I do agree that earnings growth is still strong and economy is a big barge to turn. So Q2 was not a recession yet, sub-1%, but not negative. Q3 will be a recession.
Actually Feds are quite tight for a while. The money come from $800b current account deficit. A lot of those routed to consumer pockets and to those profits we saw last quarter.
"Mass psychology is a real thing."
It's not just a real thing; in so many ways it's the only thing.
I think that's why many economists don't get it.
The one reason we have an economy is because people want to get up in the morning because they believe they have an opportunity to earn dollars that are worth something. The structural aspects are essential, but entirely secondary to the psychological aspects.
Easy money jeopardizes economic integrity from both ends.
BTW, I'm officially going on a hunger strike until my iPhone begins to work.
So I may not be around for much longer.
Have a great weekend.
"It has seemed to me that consumer spending has been inversely related to gas prices over the last year and a half. I don't see where all the analysts are getting their optimism on consumer spending." [MOM]
That's what I've been wondering as well...
"It has seemed to me that consumer spending has been inversely related to gas prices over the last year and a half. I don't see where all the analysts are getting their optimism on consumer spending." [MOM]
That's what I've been wondering as well...
They find that optimisim anywhere the can, or they don't get a paycheck.
So they refused to exchange a broken phone and you went on hunger strike in front of the Apple store? I suppose I'll see you on TV tomorrow, unless they finally exchange it.
The structural aspects are essential, but entirely secondary to the psychological aspects.
Well, I'm going to disagree (again)... there are two factors in 'demand'... and both are equally important:
1) the desire to buy (psychology)
2) the ability to buy (structural)
The two are NOT additive, rather they are multiplicative. If one goes to 'zed' the other doesn't matter, the demand (product of the two) is also 'zed'.
Most econ folks take for granted that the DESIRE to buy is always there and focus almost entirely on the ability to buy - especially income & ability to finance consumption. Most of the time that is correct.
However, when 'the market' (that would be us) gets spooked, all bets are off as to whether the desire is there... or if there maybe 'deferred'.
That to a great extent is what is happening in Asian societies - no SS, few pensions, no safety net and a long history of hardship... so even though incomes are increasing the population never quite feels safe enough to open the wallet very wide at all.
I think we, here, are a long way from being that spooked... but that's not to say it can't happen. The 1000 mile journey begins with a few small steps.
Optimism...hmm, July 4 is only a few days away, time to invest in fireworks! Just make sure you don't aim them at the overpriced house you are carrying on your back.
So then I called a contact in the DC area. A scientist. Same deal (I know this one also makes over $100,000 a year) It might be a techie thing. For a lot of us, post Y2K were lean times. Now we are back to well over $100K but drive 2 '97 vehicles, three adults living in the $200K house and we are paying down the dot.bust and real estate debt to the tune of $5K/month.
Casual dining? Jesus! I thought this was a housing blog. No, seriously, major kudos to MOM and CR.
CR, you've been holding out on us. It's time to show us some of your card tricks!
"Earnings growth is too strong for this to be anything more than a brief and minor slowdown"
hhhmmmmm. Beginning to look like you may fail the Turing Test.
I have started to notice quite a few commercial real estate "for lease" signs. They are large and easily noticable and in higher and lower rent parts of town. Still building though, so I guess it is all good.
dryfly- "... as I walked in the door there was a line of stainless steel gas bbqs."
Hey, I saw those things too, and I was impressed. One had a built-in wine cooler (beer fridge). Forget iPhones. I see one of those things in my future, and it is gooood, especially for marshmallows on warm summer nights.
bear investor's -
"In light of the Funds' circumstances, this process is more time-consuming than in prior periods,"
what prior period would that be??
it's gotta be the first time ever theytried to come with a value for something that's is "Priceless"
8 years ago those stainless steal bbq' were 3g's , at home depot expo center...
that reminds me.. did'nt PE swoop on part of HD's supplier biz...hmmm
nothing shady there...
"on or before July 16,"
any bet's on how "off" that date will be...
just between friends
time to get back into aug 155p bsc???
No, no! Some surf and turf action. Some nicely marbled rib eyes smothered in garlic butter with either lobster tails or bacon-wrapped shrimp. Grilled asparagus with home-made hollandaise sauce and buttered new potatoes. A nice spinach salad in a walnut vinaigrette. Fresh strawberries and whipped cream for dessert.
My gutless cardiologist should be gasping for air by now.
What time does Home Depot open?
mp and MOM -- I'll concur. My casual dining clients are in trouble. Despite my telling them last fall that they would be in such shape right about now, they are still surprised.
Those gas grills are awesome, but you just don't get the same flavor as you do with charcoal. My $25 Weber baby beach grill just does fine, thank you!
Well, I'm going to disagree (again)...
Yes, dryfly, but the ability itself stems from the desire, no? The essence of capitalism is to work for what you want. Furthermore, lenders have to have confidence in borrowers, etc. Every boom (and the abilities exercised therein) are the result of collective optimism.
REO: Bear Stearns Meets Possums in Georgia as Foreclosures Increase - Bloomberg.com
soon pension funds will found out they own this:
9,495 REO offered for sale on Countrywide Financial's website - Countrywide Foreclosures (REO) Blog
that reminds me.. did'nt PE swoop on part of HD's supplier biz...hmmm
Indeed they did for $10b, and most of that money likely went to share repurchases(likely of the execs). If you can't grow it, reduce the float and get rich that way.
Oddly enough, the HD Supply in Phoenix is closing, and if I didn't know better it seems as if they're going to be a virtual supply house.
Geoff My casual dining clients are in trouble. Despite my telling them last fall that they would be in such shape right about now, they are still surprised.
Yeah, when the science of economics turns dismal, no one wants to hear about it. And, of course, the Fed and the Street was talking about "containment".
"zed"?
Anyhow, dryfly has a point. There is a problem with desire. The ache to buy something, the smoldering, primordial want, can fail. Sadly, failing desire is often a matter of age and experience. If one has learned that the promised extasy of "having" goes unfulfilled, purchase after purchase, one can turn to the joy that Ebenezer knew. One can save, squirrel away the bucks and take joy in their lovely compounding. It is not a joy that many of us grew up knowing, but once discovered - Oh, the bliss! There is Viagra for the lack of desire to purchase, but many of us are becoming marketing-resistant. It is the way of the Scrooge.
Given the level of household debt and debt service, I would not be at all surprised if the vaunted reliability of the US consumer were to fade.
free holdem online poker texas tournament free holdem online poker texas tournament free holdem online poker texas tournament. 1st credit credit credit credit credit equity equity line line line line line.info sitemap.html 1st credit credit credit credit credit equity equity line line line line line.info sitemap.html 1st credit credit credit credit credit equity equity line line line line line.info sitemap.html.