More than 1.1 million homeowners will lose their homes to foreclosure by 2014 because they can't afford the rising payments on their adjustable-rate mortgages, according to a researcher.
It is a disgusting and blatant display of the govt. of the Crooks, by the Crooks, and for the Crooks.
There is no provision under the Constitution of the United States for any such thing as "Home Ownership and Equity Protection."
We must save the Bankrupters and Fraudsters of New York City. That is why we created the Fraudulent Reserve System in the first place. Moral Hazard be damned. Yeah, talk about Moral Hazard doesn't do any good.
The probability of the collapse of the American political system goes up every day that BFNYC have the control of the economy and the govt. One day it will happen. No later than 2029.
The problem is that almost anything that they do to prevent or limit new subprime or risky loans will make it that much more difficult for people who are already in trouble to sell or refinance. This is a really difficult situation, with no obvious solution to me.
The "Home Ownership and Equity Protection Act (HOEPA)"
OK, I know the FED silently strays out of bounds frequently, but in my view this is clearly a case where it's going out of the stadium and into another state.
There are supposed to be 2 principal concerns for the FED addressed by implementing policy: Inflation containment & Employment bounding. They clearly have an impact on the strength of dollar by default as a consequence of any policy decisions, even though it's not their mandate. They also address any concerns over the stability of the banking system as regulators and measure their impacts over the financial markets. OK.
But, since when have they been put in charge of protecting asset prices. Who decided Home Equity Protection is within their mandate. It's troubling when the FED openly broadens their scope. WHo holds the reins, The Supreme Court?
Well, I was considering that $500,000 dollar house, but heck, why not make it $2 million if I don't have to worry about any pesky foreclosures breathing down my neck?
I have been through some tuff times in life...where was my help when i needed it most? I have owned my house for 15 years...why can i not have my rate lowered to help me keep a little more of my (2 jobs) paycheck....this is BS. Why even bother having a credit score system if they are going to bail all thses sub-prime borrowers out? BS
Folks, HOEPA has been around since 1994. I don't remember which clever nitwit named it HOEPA, but it's not exactly unconstitutional.
It was enacted specifically to go after the predatory practice known as "equity skimming" or "equity stripping." It had and has nothing to do with supporting home prices. It's meant to keep bottom-feeder predatory lenders from doing "serial refinances" on usurious terms that end up eating away all the borrower's original equity in the loan being refinanced. It came up with something called the "benefit to borrower" rule where you had to show that a refi was actually providing some true financial benefit to the borrower; otherwise a refi that kept worsening the borrower's LTV simply by increasing the loan amount each time was considered predatory.
Of course they called it "HOEPA" because those are focus-group-tested-happy words. But you notice that 13 years later it hasn't brought the constitution to its knees.
The mandate you have in mind, the mandate for monetary policy, is not the only mandate the Fed has. It is also a regulatory institution. The law cited requires the Fed to guard against abusive lending, whatever that may be. The Fed is an arm of government. when Congress instructs the Fed to undertake a certain task, odds are the Fed will.
Bloomberg's second story on this hearing, right after the simple press release, took the view that the Fed is holding this hearing because Congress is leaning on the Fed get involved in this problem, as required by law. I would not be too surprised to see the Fed drag its feet in actually doing anything about abusive lending.
Dammit, just because I signed the lease, doesn't mean I should have to make the payment.
I also demand forgiveness from past and future tenant lease obligations. This predation from the greedy landlords has got to stop. I want freedom from rent payments. Yeah, I lied and said I made that much money and could pay, but I can't. I should be guaranteed forgiveness because, well...just because, alright!! I'm in America, isn't that enough?
I want, I want, I want...this is the USA, gimme what I want, damn you.
But seriously, doesn't this set (initiate) a new precedent for contract law that a signature doesn't hold one accountable for the contract? Any lawyers out there want to nibble that one? Does this slope slip a bit? And how big is that bit?
So people who borrowed more than they could afford are going to get some help?!
If the govt subsidizes some of my down-payment, I will gladly make sure one of the forclosed homes in my area will not go unused. Why should I use my money in the smart way if Congress is going to do something dumb like this?
I was actually referring to this I saw on Reuters...
Community groups that help subprime borrowers try to save their homes from foreclosure would receive $300 million in aid under legislation introduced on Thursday. The infusion of federal money would help consumer groups reach out to troubled borrowers and, in some cases, provide new financing directly.
dotcommunist, I wouldn't worry about contract law collapsing. There are laws such as the Fair Trade Act, in particular, that guard against unfair, misleading and deceptive business practices. The test there is whether the average consumer would be likely to be misled.
HOEPA probably needs to be expanded to give the Fed enough authority to do all it should, but there is certainly no bar under current law for bringing actions in some situations.
PS: I am not going to argue with those who claim that some borrowers knew what they were doing. It is obvious that they did. But when you have 70 year olds who had their houses nearly paid off and who now find themselves in an absolutely untenable situation, there is adequate room to bring a case. Everyone who got rooked by these mortgages was not a knowing participant.
PS: I am not going to argue with those who claim that some borrowers knew what they were doing. It is obvious that they did. But when you have 70 year olds who had their houses nearly paid off and who now find themselves in an absolutely untenable situation, there is adequate room to bring a case. Everyone who got rooked by these mortgages was not a knowing participant.
MaxedOutMama
MOM: The gov't and all its various RE/mortgage progams and tax incentives are unending. More tax payer dollars going into maintaining the RE industry/HB industry/mortgage indusry. All we seem to be getting from this money is higher priced homes.
New Century gets no bids, lays off 2,000 workers
New Century Financial of Irvine received no bids for its loan-making unit and is laying off about 2,000 employees, the Associated Press reports.
McPherron, on the other hand, says he wouldn't be surprised if home sales were still soft well into the summer months, even though year-over-year comparisons could improve. And if the trend set in March continues, as the numbers suggest, into April, May, and beyond, the many sellers who are struggling to make their mortgage payments and holding out desperately for a spring buying boom could be in for a shock, at least, and foreclosure at worst.
"Many people think, 'if I can just hang on 'til the spring,' they will get an offer," says McPherron. "This spring, they'll be lucky to sell."
MoM: I'm having a hard time picturing how 70 year olds who are close to payoff are victims of predatory lending. It would seem that if they're close to payoff they've had the loans for quite some time (close to 15 to 30 years?) which was way before most of this mess started. Am I missing something?
O.T. but relevant to larger discussion here -- from The Street Light:
As I've discussed before, income growth for households that get their income through their labor has been sluggish during this economic recovery. Profits have been strong, and the income of people who get a lot of their income from their ownership of US corporations has done well... but labor income has generally struggled along at 2-3% real growth for the past several years.
Consumption growth, on the other hand, has been considerably and consistently stronger. How is that possible? There are three ways. First, households have spent an ever-growing portion of their income... so much so that by 2005 the savings rate actually turned consistently negative for the very first time. Second, some American households have enjoyed strong income growth from non-labor sources. I'm referring mostly to those profits that I mentioned above. Third, many households have used mortgage equity withdrawals to finance their consumption.
These various sources of money for households to spend have propped up consumption growth at a solid level despite relatively weak growth in labor income. But there are good reasons to guess that all three of these supports for consumption are running out.
The end of the housing boom and concomitant MEW phenomenon has been well documented by others (yes, I'm talking about Calculated Risk), so that source of money is drying up. Corporate profits have grown amazingly well in recent years, but probably can't continue that pace for much longer.
That leaves changes in the savings rate. But if anything, it is starting to seem like we are entering a phase where households will be more interested in moving their savings rate back toward zero, rather than allow it to become more negative. However, to bring the savings rate back toward zero (not to mention positive) households will have to allow several period elapse with rates of consumption growth below the rate of income growth.
Put it all together, and it seems quite likely to me that we're in for a period of slower consumption growth. And given the importance of consumption in the US's economic growth right now, that does not spell good news for the economy as a whole.
doesn't this set (initiate) a new precedent for contract law that a signature doesn't hold one accountable for the contract?
You don't, really, think that HOEPA is the only law on the federal or state books that regulates the kinds of contracts one can enter into, and the obligations of either party to establish the other party's capacity to perform under the terms, do you?
Do you have any idea how easy it is to get a 70-year old homeowner to sign away her home on a predatory loan that increases her existing mortgage balance only by rolling outrageous points and fees into it--without giving her any cash--and that has some evil balloon clause on it that forces her to keep coming back to you for another refi? You think such a contract should be enforceable? If you do, I hope you die young. You'll need to.
This pretense that because most people understand the notes they sign, everyone does, just blows my mind. Nobody is vulnerable in your world? I once asked where Orange County hid its children. Now I have to wonder where some people hide their elderly.
No legitimate lender has ever had a moment's worry about getting busted on a HOEPA rap. You can take my word for that. I was in the biz back in '94 when HOEPA came out. We all said, "there are lenders who do that? What scum. Send 'em to jail."
And as you notice the mortgage industry didn't collapse under the regulatory burden, nor did anybody's taxes get raised to enforce HOEPA. As a matter of fact, you will notice that the HOEPA era ushered in some major money-making. The problems we are having today are coming in large part because we strayed from the basic concepts of HOEPA, not because of HOEPA.
They were, before they got the cash-out refi. Or the next two, when they couldn't understand why their payments kept zooming up.
There are also non-English speakers who were preyed upon by unscrupulous members of their own ethnic group.
Seriously, there are going to be a number of successful actions. It only takes one Babs (who tells her customer the complete opposite of what the disclosure says) to screw matters up.
Yes. You are missing the kind of lending that was common before 1994 and not so common these days.
You may not see a lot of door-to-door siding salesmen wandering neighborhoods conning old ladies into signing HELOC notes with disbursements directly to the "home improvement" company for work that never gets done.
The reason you don't see so much of that these days is because HOEPA put a stop to it.
Bofiz, it's just new stuff these days, which is why some people think HOEPA needs an overhaul.
Predatory lending is Borg: it adapts. You have to keep remodulating your phaser. HOEPA stopped a lot of really outrageous stuff. And a lot of bottom-feeders who got cut off at the knees by HOEPA went on to some new way to subvert the process.
I just get irritated when the idea is put forth that there are no abusive trade practices, just dumb borrowers who deserve everything they get.
I just discovered a few months ago--along with the rest of the world--that a drug I took six times last year has been pulled off the market because new testing that the manufactuer hid from the FDA shows that in best case, it isn't effective, and in worst case it causes harm to people. And that shit cost almost $2,000 a dose, besides the fact that the side-effects are awful.
My doctor prescribed it, and I trusted my doctor, and I took it. Is someone here willing to tell me that I would have no grounds for suing the manufacturer if it turns out I were harmed? (Fortunately, I seem to be just in the group for which it didn't do anything, and it's my insurance company who gets to sue for its money back if it wants to.)
How about a little "there but for the grace of [insert theological preoccupation of choice] go I?"
In a move aimed at heading off more problems in the subprime mortgage market, the House Financial Services Committee approved a bill Thursday that increases federal loan limits in high-cost areas of the country and authorizes lower down payments for borrowers...
The bill also contains a provision to put FHA surpluses into an affordable housing fund...
To become law the full House and Senate would need to approve the bill and the president would need to sign it.
This is starting to sound like a classic freedom-vs.-safety question. To what extent are people competent to manage their own affairs? In a realm like this, perhaps not terribly. I still think insiders seriously underestimate the confusing nature of a complex industry often described in impenetrable jargon.
Six months ago, before I started reading this blog, I had never heard of negative-amortization mortgages. As soon as I read Tanta's post on the subject, I went, "Aha! That's what happened to (two friends of mine)."
Here's the story: they're a married couple in their late twenties, weighed down financially with years and years of college debt. In 2004, they decided they wanted a house. They went to their friendly neighborhood mortgage lender (not even a subprime outfit. BoA, I believe), "We want a house. We only have this much money to spend. Can we have one?"
The friendly neighborhood mortgage lender said, "Sure you can!" And they got their house.
Fast-forward to 2007. My friends are trying to sell their house. They discover that the balance on the loan is larger than the original amount of the mortgage. Thankfully, the house has appreciated significantly, but what if it hadn't?
These friends of mine are not stupid people. Nor are they greedy people; both the house and their incomes are quite modest. They try hard to be financially responsible. They just don't know anything.
Where do lending stories like this stop being opportunity and start being exploitation?
CNN money story:
John Devaneys not a developer, and hes certainly not a flipper. The CEO of United Capital Markets is a bond trader. And one of his specialties is buying and selling bonds that are backed by the mortgage payments of ordinary homeowners.
Option ARMs? Devaney loves em. The consumer has to be an idiot to take on those loans, he says. But it has been one of our best-performing investments.
OK, is anyone still confused about who should be blamed for what? Hmmm, the naive, or those who stand to profit the most mightily for suckering the naive and then stripping them of their homes?
Moody's, S&P Understate Subprime Risk, Study Says (Update1)
By Mark Pittman
May 3 (Bloomberg) -- Moody's Investors Service, Standard & Poor's and Fitch Ratings understate the risks of subprime mortgage bonds, putting funding for the U.S. housing industry at risk, according to a study to be released today.
Agree with the above comment about freedom vs. safety. Not sure the govt. should be bailing out folks who made bad business deals. The buyers signed the papers. They should've asked the question whether they could afford a $500,000 mortgage on a $40,000 salary. Local story in Sacramento about a guy who bought 6 homes on a $40K salary! And he signed loan apps that mistated his income!
Obviously, the mortgage brokers who were encouraging folks to falsify applications need to be reigned in.
"Forclosure moratorium- that should give lenders food for thought when making future lending decisions in MA"
deb, that was exactly my thought as well. What lender in their right mind would want to lend in a state where the main recourse against non-payment has been effectively eliminated? Talk about unlimited risk potential!
This should have the effect of totally siezing up the MA RE market. I wonder how many other states will follow MA off the cliff?
I'm not in favor of a govt bailout either -- my fantasy is sticking the mortgage brokers' and lenders' noses right down in the mess they made and making them 100 percent responsible. My fantasy would protect the innocent (taxpayers), save money, and have a highly deterrent effect for further collateral-damage prone scams and shenanigans.
However, I recognize that in this nation that prides itself on protecting the rich from what their free markets have wrought, this might not happen.
Therefore, national/state/local govts might be left to try to prop up their own economies and tax bases however they can.
Amadis of Gaul - you nailed it. I tend toward a libertarian stance by instinct, but when you work in a field like banking you realize that enlightened regulation is necessary to make the market WORK. It is possible to send money in circles for long enough to mask the eventual outcome for long enough to swamp good dealing that makes an honest profit with bad dealing that makes a hefty profit. Those hefty profits fund advertising, and bring capital inflows from the market, and pay for plenty of lobbying money.... And they cause boards to ask "why is so-and-so making so much money while we are not?"
Lending, especially consumer lending, is an odd business for honest people. The most ardent rightwinger will develop some liberal tendencies after a few years, and the most pie-in-sky leftwinger will develop some cynical perspectives on human nature in a few years. It all comes down to what works for most people. You can't save them all from bad decisions, but you can reasonably hope to get most of them to understand and reflect on the decision they are making.
How and by what means you develop a reasonable certainty that both parties to a transaction are knowingly signing the contract is not a minor matter easily settled. Your friends should have understood the loan before they signed for it. "Lucky" is not good enough.
The most ardent rightwinger will develop some liberal tendencies after a few years, and the most pie-in-sky leftwinger will develop some cynical perspectives on human nature in a few years
Spot on! That's actually one of the reasons I stayed in the mortgage business for so long. You either shed your knee-jerk platitudes about the world or you get your ass handed to you. You either deal with your customers as people--real people, not "rational agents" of economic theory or piteous characters in some morality play--or you fail.
One reason the market is so distorted right now is because the ass-handing has been delayed for too long by endless capital infusions and a great deal of hand-clapping for Tinkerbell. But I will say that one "liberal" tendency I have never got erased by my business, and that is the belief that you pick on someone your own size. Encouraging people to take Option ARMs on a stated income deal is like some teenage bully tempting a five-year-old to pull the pin on the fire extinguisher.
Anybody who wants to take sides in the investment bank-rating agency-mortgage servicer circular firing squad debate is free to do so. Some days I'm tempted to conclude they all deserve each other and we should just let them play Darwin until some party evolves sapience. But to let vulnerable homeowners get caught up in that out of some fetish about "freedom"? Not for me. The borrower may not have known what he was doing when he signed that note, but I did if I was his lender. If I can't justify the deal afterwards, you should come after me. I'm supposed to know what I'm doing in exchange for a federal forking bank charter.
A small excerpt:
"I called a couple of local REO brokers to get a feel of what the business is like these days. Here is what I heard:
Hearsay #1 early or first payment defaults are truly intentional. Borrowers maxed out on a cash-out refinance and then simply wait for the foreclosure process to finally end when the Marshall removed them from the premises, often a year or more from when they first stop payment. This behavior is not only irresponsible but it surprised me that so many are knowledgeable enough to choose this way out.
Hearsay #2 all REO brokers have more business than they can handle, even as more brokers are reclassifying themselves as REO specialists. Based on the numbers that I was told, REO volume has indeed surpassed the worst of times in SD since the early 1980s.
Hearsay #3 asset management companies are more prevalent than previous cycles. In other words, lenders/servicers outsource REO disposition to a third party who then contracts with individual brokers where the REOs may be located. These asset management companies are swamped nationwide, hence the auctions in hope of disposing properties in volume.
Hearsay #4 REOs had been clogged in the pipeline because lenders were slow in reacting to the rapidly declining market. They are now at a point of realization and are adjusting prices accordingly. If this auction proves to be disappointing, the lenders are likely to be far more aggressive."
Tanta: What do you think of the proposal by Sen. Schumer and others to "establish a fudiciary duty" for mortgage brokers? In other words, brokers would be obligated to act in the best interests of borrowers, and if they didn't, they could be sued.
From Schumer's press release today:
"Legislation to Hold Mortgage Brokers and Originators Accountable: The bill seeks to regulate mortgage brokers and originators under the Truth in Lending Act (TILA) by establishing on behalf of consumers a fiduciary duty and other standards of care. In addition, the bill outlines standards for brokers and originators to assess a borrower's ability to repay a mortgage and holds lenders accountable for brokers and appraisers. The enforcement mechanism applied to this new section is those that currently apply under TILA."
I'm not cheering for a bailout by any stretch, but I wonder if one of the most important solutions to the problem is turning mortgage brokers into fiduciaries.
I have lots and lots of clueless-friends mortgage stories, but a common thread seems to be the naive assumption that the guy across the desk doesn't want to screw them over. I don't think the thought ever crosses their minds that what's best for the broker isn't also necessarily best for them. Believe it or not, they trust loan officers too.
They come away from these transactions HAPPY because they get what they want and don't have a clue that they've just been taken. An older gentleman who's another friend of mine was delighted with the broker who steered him into a no-doc because it was "easier," even though I'm sure he would have had no trouble documenting his income and assets. He actually recommended her to me, like he thought she was being nice to him and doing him a favor. It's pitiable.
Shouldn't we make all of these loan reps what people actually think they are?
early or first payment defaults are truly intentional.
No, really? Tell us something we don't know.
It has been a while since I did a post on buy-backs; maybe I should do one again.
There is a reason why every loan sale contract says you have to buy back an EPD loan, regardless of whether it met the rules or not.
The reason is because EPDs are not innocent situations. In all my years in the business, I have seen three EPD loans I can remember that were not fraudulent on someone's part. In all cases they involved a borrower who was injured or incapacitated like two days after closing. As I recall, all three of them got worked out just fine by the mortgage servicer.
The other 99.9% of EPDs are people who never intended to make a payment. That's why they're worthless.
Traditional underwriting and due diligence can really weed a lot of those out. The point to bear in mind is that never before in the history of the secondary market in mortgages have we ever seen EPD rates like we have in the last two or three years. Maybe human nature changed, but I tend to think that lenders stopped trying to control the quality of their loan pipelines. It was assumed that a few bad apples wouldn't spoil the whole barrel. Yep.
Amadis,
The same thing happens in other areas of financial services. How many unsuspecting, frequently elderly people are sold low performing mutual funds through life insurance or annuities? How many knew the "Investment Consultant" was receiving hidden fees out of their money?
What do you think of the proposal by Sen. Schumer and others to "establish a fudiciary duty" for mortgage brokers?
I think it's the key to a great deal of the problem. It will change the industry dramatically. And that's a good thing.
Think of it this way: in this day and age, what do you need a broker for when we're talking mortgage loans?
Sure, if I wanted to buy a named diamond, or I were trying to sell the Dowager Empress of Bohemia's tea set, I would probably hire a broker to find a buyer or seller for me.
Mortgage lenders aren't exactly that hard to find. What with the net and all, not even people who live in East Jesus have no access to a lender.
Therefore nobody needs a broker just to find loans. They need a broker to find them good loans. If I am a lender and I want to hire a broker, I want that broker to bring me good customers. I got all the nitwits I need from my website.
Seriously. If the broker isn't representing some party in a fiduciary relationship, then the broker is doing nothing but adding to the consumer's costs by being a middleman with its hand out for fees.
Do you have a "manifesto posting" in which you've laid out your thoughts on how the mortgage system should be reformed?
It would make a nice link to put on the CR homepage - just for background and as a framework for people who haven't thought this through and/or have the experience.
Another reason - you've said the media doesn't really understand the issues. I assume you don't think they know the correct solution either. For a reporter, manifestos are very, very handy to have. I'm not planning on ripping you off (I rarely write on mortgage markets - I'm just fascinated/appalled by the car wreck element of the whole debt bubble) but I know other reporters do read this site.
Rob, you know I keep threatening to write a manifesto--I haven't written one since my college days--no, you don't need to know what that was about--but it's just finding time, energy, and inspiration all lining up on the same day that's the problem.
And don't think for a minute I'd be annoyed if reporters wanted to use it. I just want to make them credit a blog instead of some dipshit industry shill or think panzer outfit. In fact, if I thought I could make the NYT do that, I'd get busy writing the manifesto.
So don't stop bugging me for it. I'm hard to manage, but not impossible to manage. (I actually have a reference from a former boss that says those exact words.)
Wow.. The holy wrath of god and right to contract folks have come out in force here. I agree with Tanta, lighten up people. As satisfying as self-sanctimoniousness feels, it generally dumb, and grade school level juvenile. This blog is all about dumping the hype and using your brains, not the part of your anatomy you sit on.
While it is true that these greedy and/or trusting fools put themselves in their situations by signing on the dotted line, it may surprise you that, as constitutional and god given as the right to contract is, the law puts the onus on BOTH parties to the contract to mitigate or avoid forseeable disasters. This is particularly the case when one of the parties has a higher level of knowledge and should have known better. Government also has the duty to make sure our citizens play nice together and enforce a level as possible playing field. It is in society's best interest that this be so. (See, Anti-trust laws)
You don't buy up "stumpage rights" from small land owners and clear cut millions of acres of forest and then deny you had no clue that an ecological disaster was going to happen and besides, you were contractually allowed to do so. The judge is going to find a special place for you in the slammer, believe me.
No one is suggesting that the borrowers be let off scott-free, and I'm guessing that that will not happen. But just like in Bankruptcy, society and the government have an interest in making sure the SYSTEM (not the borrowers) is fair and has been stabilized. (Surprisingly policy-wise Bankruptcy is not simply a mechanism to let people get away with welching on their debts (I'll ignore the fact that most bankruptcies happen from medical or divorce and not because of freeloaders), but the decision that we as a society are better off having them be producing members of society and not under a huge un-payable pile of debt, unable to feed themselves. It also serves as an enforcement mechanism against predatory lenders.)
The greedy borrower's made their nodoc negam bargains and are going to be stuck with at least a portion of that millstone. However, as the second greedy party to the bargain, the lenders will also have to play a part in the work out of any disasters. In particular, because they KNEW better (knew as in a sophisticated, specific, historical, amoritization table/CPA ability-to-pay kind of knew), they also wrote the contracts, and, as they were the ones most able to avoid the disaster (Gee, loan denied! You don't qualify/get the cash) the law will probably see them as more than a little at fault.
The bottom line -- this is a freaking disaster for our society and very few people that were parties to this are going to have blamelessly clean hands in the end. When fire starts raging through the neighborhood it's best to stop bickering and help put out the flames or your own house may burn. If on later investigation into the cause it turns
If on later investigation into the cause it turns out that one neighbor sold the pyromaniac kid next door gasoline when they knew it was likely for them to have matches somewhere, well, it is going to be hard for them to claim that they had a right to contract to sell gas.
calm down, Tanta, it was tongue-in-cheek. Nevertheless, you wrote: This pretense that because most people understand the notes they sign, everyone does, just blows my mind.
My underlying point refers to exactly that. Why a moratorium if, in your words, most people understand the notes they sign?
Sure, there are plenty of victims, so should we let all the liars and cheaters get away, too?
"Seriously. If the broker isn't representing some party in a fiduciary relationship, then the broker is doing nothing but adding to the consumer's costs by being a middleman with its hand out for fees."
Yeah, you nailed it -- a middleman collecting his toll. A useless moron who has somehow managed to create for himself an impassable toll both on the bridge between the real buyer and the real seller -- preferably with Congressional or "Legislated Trade Group" backing. Think NRA, AMA, etc.
Also known as "Rent Seeking", or "Making (Grabbing) a Ton of Green by doing almost nothing". Our Great, 21st Century, Morally-Putrid, American Uber-Innovation. Look around, everywhere you turn your head, what do you see -- every would-be "New Economy Genius" beating their 6 brain cells trying to come up with an "innovation" on the Pet Rock theme. "Gee, if only I could come up with a way to pick up rocks off the ground for free and sell them for a huge profit, I'd be as Happy as a Pig in a Wallow!"
I keep laughing when I read the crap coming out of the Fed, Congress, the financial know-it-alls with regard to "financial innovation"! There's no "innovation" in fraud, deceit, scamming, ponzi, and 3 Card Monty schemes -- that's as old as the Bronze Age. What is "innovative" about loan programs that try to mask the truth -- the damn property is too freakin much money for the poor bastard to afford -- EVER.
But this environment of fraud, scam, deceit, phoney-baloney is all around us -- Real Estate only being the latest and most Headline Grabbing. Just look at the current White House Administration and the House of Clowns called Congress. Just look at the 401(K) scams whereby your Great Father -Figure Employer farms out the paperwork management of your 401(K) to some 2-bit Boozo who basically does nothing Value-Added and takes a whopping chunk of your retirement for that "Service" -- and HIDES tha fact to boot! Yeah, for all you numskulls who don't know about this one -- just Google lawsuit + 401(K) and see what you come up with -- and don't be surprised to find your own Employer's 401(K) plan mentioned.
Ask almost anyone today what their ideal path to a successful life is -- especially those under 40 years of age -- it's likely to be some form of Rent Seeking activity.
I could go on with 150,000 examples -- but what's the point -- it's right there in our faces -- either you see or you don't. The Simple Moral Value -- that you should Deserve (Earn) What You Get has been lost, The Simple Moral Value that Leaches Are Bad For the Human Race and should be SQUASHED ON SIGHT has been lost.
--Andrew
it may surprise you that, as constitutional and god given as the right to contract is, the law puts the onus on BOTH parties to the contract to mitigate or avoid forseeable disasters.
Talk about a puff piece post, Abraham Lincoln wiped his ass with the constitution in the war between the states and the constitution is seen now as a living document. The War Between the States was all about business and had nothing to do with slavery except maybe for the use as a bargaining chip. Wilson finished what remained of the constitution off and one of his gifts was the FED, which was also about business, in this case the business of banks and moral hazard.
I also don't happen to know anyone that was touched on the shoulder by GOD and told they have a right to squat especially when it comes to a mortgage contract.
As usual (with an accent on the "usu"), when the heat starts to singe the little toesies of the chiselers on relief, who do people look to?
Well, it isn't the Ghost Busters.
It's the lenders. It's all their fault. Boo hoo hoo.
C'mon. Give me a break. The lenders have been doing everything in their power to explain and clarify the usurious terms of their loans. There are guys in Brooklyn with baseball bats gathering dust in the back of the room, crying their eyes out in envy of today's lenders.
Here's an analogy. All the Democrats say they were tricked into voting to invade Iraq. Do you believe them? Hell, no. They knew there were no WMD's. They knew an extraordinarily sophisticated guerrilla force would oppose us for years and years, killing thousands of our troops. They knew the country would sink into anarchy. Who are they trying to kid?
We're in big trouble when people start casting aspersions on the selfless lenders who have made this country great.
Dotcommunist, not only have I never advocated for a foreclosure moratorium, I seem to recall having written a fairly caustic post about that not long ago wherein I observed that it wouldn't do much more than increase accrued interest costs for borrowers who were going to lose their homes anyway.
So don't ask me to defend that one. I will only observe that it's rather like the arguments about the death penalty to me. I do not wish to see the guilty go unpunished. I would rather see all the guilty be spared the death penalty than to execute one innocent person. Since there are alternatives to the death penalty, I see no reason to insist that there will be no punishment if there are no executions.
I am not interested in judicial vengeance on the subject of mortgage lending. So there it is.
How about a little "there but for the grace of [insert theological preoccupation of choice] go I?"
Tanta: I totally agree. But there's plenty of fraud to go around these days it seems. Not all of the fraudsters were lenders; some of 'em were borrowers who lied about their income and other stuff too.
We definitely need some sort of government regulations so that borrowers are made very much aware of what the term "negative amortization" means if there's the slightest possibility that they're getting into that kind of loan, for example.
But I worry about any bailouts that will rescue people who engaged in risky economic behavior - that will just encourage more of said behavior.
And then there was an article linked here a bit further up about how the House has voted to allow FHA loans with smaller downpayments (3% isn't small enough?) and higher loan limits. That just seems crazy at this point.
Tanta, I must have missed your earlier posting on a moratorium.
However, my biggest grievance is that the predatory lending caused an imbalance in affordability that will only be re-balanced if things like foreclosures are allowed to proceed. While that significant house price decline is not desired by 2/3 of the country, it is still needed and healthy to restore balance. It seems that our bubble makers have the notion that if they can stop the REO tsunami from taking down house prices, they will get their much-touted 'soft landing'. The derivative pitchmen would also love that outcome. Didn't ex-Fed head Lucifer Greenhole just mention that a 10% increase in prices will solve everything?
Yeah, except for anyone who doesn't already have a house, and the future generations who aren't lucky enough to inherit one.
Something about that hoped-for outcome strikes me as an extremely good attempt at eroding the middle class further.
And that is why a foreclosure moratorium is bad, and only bad.
How's this: Create a foreclosure review board that will review each one to determine the level of lender predation. Those who were truly victimized will have the lender get forced to rework the loan (provided Ranieri can get all the bondholders to agree). The loans that were partly predation and partly cheating/lying irresponsible borrower get foreclosed.
Seriously, a foreclosure moratorium is the new Greenhole Put, or rather, the MBS put.
I lived & worked in the Midwest all through the 80s farm crisis... damn near every state from the Rocky Mountains to the Great Lakes & Canadian border to the Gulf of Mexico either considered or enacted 'foreclosure moratoriums'...
Regardless foreclosures all eventually went through.
You couldn't even consider them a speed bump so many farms went bust so fast.
All the moratoriums did was allow the pols to (1) show they care - this was before 'feel my pain'... and (2) buy time to figure out how big a sponge they'll need to sop up the spilled milk.... needed one m/f big sponge.
What did the farmers get out of it? The opportunity to plant and harvest one more crop that came in at a loss (commodity prices were so low then as to be almost ridiculous). Maybe two seasons if they were especially unlucky.
I wouldn't lose a lot of sleep over this one. It'll be one more opportunity to watch an Academy Award level performance of hand wringing. I wouldn't miss it - you'll be able to tell you grandkids all about it.
Sorry if I'm so jaded - just been there & done that.
I have to keep posting these "I hate Halo" comments so that I can post the one I tried to post unsuccessfully that Halo will now no longer accept because it thinks the comment is a duplicate. Whatever.
Dotcommunist, let me quickly clarify my general take on the foreclosure/predation thing.
People who are struggling but could make the loan work with a reasonable modification should get one. If the only thing preventing that is some self-righteous harrumphing about other people getting a break, spare me.
People who cannot carry their loans or sell their homes need to get foreclosed (or allowed to do a short sale or DIL, if possible) to get it over with. Noodling around for these people will only make it worse. If they were foolish, they're getting punished. They're losing anything they put in the transaction, they're losing anything they spent on the home, they're getting killed on their credit record for 7 years, they'll have a hell of a time getting new credit once the anti-subprime backlash gets underway, and they'll have to find other housing. What else does anyone want from these people? A scarlet H?
If the borrower was a victim of predation, you make the lender cancel the loan. That's not a foreclosure, friends. The lender can go to court and see if it can get a judge to award it title to the property; I don't care. If it can't, well, tough. It just bought somebody a house. You think that's enough negative reinforcement for predatory lenders? Dear god, people think I'm not tough enough.
Hmm.. "Puff piece" Next time I'll have to remember to include the "Esq." after my sig. Well, sorry I tried to change a world view. However Kevin's larger point is valid, people are probably still too pissed off about particulars of this financial debacle for the pragmatism necessary to start cleaning up the mess (before we ALL get dinged by it) to set in. (I'll try to avoid the strict construction vs. living document constitutional theological argument for the moment if you don't mind.)
I should have also placed "god given" of constitutional and god given right to contract in quotes, it was meant as dark sarcasm, which as I'm once again learning should only be used by experts. I'm personally not a bible thumper and am really just a recovering Mid-Western Lutheran (think Lake Woebegon). Unfortunately this means that, unlike Tanta, all I really have to rebel against from my religious upbringing are potluck dinners and tuna noodle casserole with those danged crunchy canned onion rings on top.
Andrew, you are undoubtedly a better lawyer than I, but I've eaten as much lime jello salad at the Friday Fish Fry as anyone, so let's not talk about recovering from our theo-culinary heritage.
Or else dryfly will start writing hotdish haiku again.
What happens to their previous quarters if you strip out their subprime gains? Oops. Thats a question they sure dont want to answer. And how much accumulated interest income have they recorded but not actually received?
I bolded (is that a word?) the part that I thought was interesting. I haven't read much on this nuance (the way that companies have been able to record non-existent (phantom) interest income) and how it might effect their bottom line. Has anyone read anything that attempts to quantify this value?
As I understand it when a person pays less than the interest on an option arm the company can record the whole interest payment as income. So I would be looking for lenders who have lots of negam option arms right?
Does anyone know if plain old negam loans also allow for this accounting anomaly?
btw, Tanta you got a shout out on that website, I bet if I asked you a year ago if you ever thought you'd be a mortgage superstar you would have thought I was nuts-o!
.......
Something to watch, from what I have heard today, there has been some tightening of credit at the retail level concerning the purchase of furniture, this could be significant, retailers turning to alternate lenders to pick up the lower scores.
The alternate lenders do not offer the same terms, ie no payments or interest until ???
On another note, the GM cc is a must listen, especially the question answer period and tadross in rare form over the accounts payable issue.
Last year 800K homes were built in Spain about 1/2 the number in the US which has 7X Spain's population. I'm sure Spain is growing faster than we are, but not that much faster. Now that's a real estate bubble.
Theological stuff aside, one basic change in regulations that could prove fruitful is for borrowers of any loan with a scheduled neg-am payment to be provided with one, three and five-year amortizations showing the expected balance if they use that option.
I can tell you right now that this would cause a lot of "No, thank you's" when the borrowers look at those numbers.
Alot of it is second houses for wealthy Germans, Brits etc. From what I've read they are vacation homes so they will not be dropped on the market in 16 months... They maybe empty but wont apply downward pressure on the prices...
People seem to forget the entire world around Americans is a social contract whereby there are damn few people living in cardboard boxes and begging on the streets. The same social contract gave you schools, hospitals, social security, roads, disaster relief and even television, among many other things. Try saying that you've never received a handout or a hand up. Are you taking care of your sick, retired parents in a room in your house on your own income? Are you grawing your own food? Are you clearing a path across the prarie or woods evey day so that you can shoot a bear for dinner. Spare the fauz outrage. Even if a 100 billion was proposed for morgage relief (which it is not), what does that compare to the hundreds of billions being WASTED right now by this gvernment in Iraq. Leaving aside the reasons for the war the word WASTE applies to the money spilled without result. The first, and lowest form of human behavior is to say sanctimoniuosly, thank God, I'm not like them.
Let's see earnings are up, ISM-manufacturing is up, ISM-services is up, productivity is up, factory orders are up, media stocks are up, the overall stock market is breaking records, household net worth is up, financial assets of individuals and corporations have increased vastly more than their liabilities, and jobless claims are way down. These are just a few snippets of continued economic prosperity.
There is no bubble. There is no recession. And with core inflation a mere 2.1 percent over the past twelve months, the stability and continued profits reins supreme.
We are in the middle of a synchronized global economic expansion the likes of which the world has never seen.
The Dow is enjoying its best winning streak since 1955. It has risen in 21 of the last 24 sessions.
Although a subculture of the economic food chain will be choose to be left behind, the question is:
Have things ever been better in all of human history?
Theo-culinary heritage, hotdish haiku and euker.. Yikes! Okay Tanta and dryfly, you made your point. If its all right with you I'll just scamper back to lurker status here. Battles of wits with an unarmed person (me) can get ugly. The constitutionality and contract stuff just got to me and I had to vent a little.
Anger, hatred, foaming at the mouth, bitterness, envy, victimology, unaccountability, non-responsibility, unpatriotic anti-Americanism, whinniness, pissiness, moaning and self-loathing and all with a dash of mental instability and lunacy--not to mention moonbattery!
Some things never change.
Betting against the massive, muscular USS Economy will get you what you've - your trembling, exposed asses blown off.
"all I really have to rebel against from my religious upbringing are potluck dinners and tuna noodle casserole with those danged crunchy canned onion rings on top."
Ooohh, after I quit distrusting people over thirty (I became one so what could I do) I did a second childhood number and fell in love with that stuff. But then, I was raised in So Cali by Midwestern parents ...jeez, I feel so dirty (sob).
OnT: Brokers et al -- and this goes for stocks as well as mortgages -- either need to be called what they have, for the most part, been until now -- that is, sales-people -- and forbidden by law to refer to themselves otherwise or they need to be reconstrued as fiduciaries with whatever regulatory overhang that entails and licensed accordingly.
Anything else is false advertising whatever one thinks of the other problems. JMO
I see the usual list of one-note-pony housing-centric lunatics have gathered here at the Alternate Reality Saloon to communicate with one another about the housing led recession and the tapped out consumer. A nice safe environment where they are not ridiculed by men, shunned by women, and mistrusted by children.
Has anybody seen my RECESSON? Huh, have you? I know it was here in 2001 or thereabouts. At least someone said it was, although almost NOBODY noticed it.
As long as youre looking, keep your eyes peeled for my 600,000 lost residential construction jobs too, cant seem to find any trace of those either.
Unemployment...no jobs...recession...soup kitchens...where are the jobs? ...my income isn't growing...poverty...depression... Buddy, can you spare a dime?...The Grapes of Wrath...Tobacco Road...outsourcing...globalization...its not fair...Bangladesh...redistribute...where's my BMW?...where's mine...you owe me....I'm not accountable...you are responsible...it takes a village!
We enter the new quater with considerable economic MOJO. The "one-trick-pony" alarmists are no longer relevant, and will need to find their own parallel universe in which to communicate with one another about the tapped out consumer and the housing led recession.
Ah, yes. I can smell the roses--and DJIA 15000.
The BODACIOUS profitfest debauchery rolls along.
KAAACHING!!
I am farting through silk, baby, farting through silk!
ATTENTION SCARED OF YOUR OWN SHADOWS BOND HOLDING PERMABEARS:
Data mining and WART DOCTORING for any bad news that fits your narrow, housingcentric world view is evidence of only one thing that the USUAL LUNATICS who constitute a certain sector of the financial food chain are not and will not be participating in the ongoing BODACIOUS profitfest debauchery.
One of Jacksonvilles oldest and best-known homebuilders is calling it quits due to what its owner says is a prolonged downturn in the local real estate market.
Panitz Signature Homes made the decision last month to leave the homebuilding business rather than weather the current cycle. The company will sell 11 homes, 25 home sites and 32 townhome sites during a May 19 auction. J.P. King Auction Company will manage the sale.
I am stunned, stunned!, not to find a single reference to the very strong economic state of the union here
Check out The Wall Street Journal article, entitled Class of 07 Gets Plenty of Job Offers. It talked about employers planning to hire 17 percent more graduates this year than they did last year. This happens to top the college-hiring peak of the last economic boom in 2000.
The fact is, jobs continue to boom. So do real incomes, productivity, and profits. Economist Michael Darda points out that real wages over the first five years of the Bush expansion are actually growing more rapidly than over the first five years of the Papa Bush/Bill Clinton boom.
Meanwhile, unemployment today is only 4.2 percent. Federal, state, and local tax collections are soaring through the roof. Budget deficits are plunging. Inflation-adjusted GDP is averaging just more than 3 percent. Family wealth stands at a record of slightly more than $54 trillion. Total employment is at a record 146 million.
Stock markets, as you might have noticed, also continue to rise. CA-CHING! They have done so, almost without interruption, for four years, on the shoulders of a remarkable surge in business profits -- which itself is a function of the high-tech, knowledge-based product explosion.
These corporate profits, along with our record-setting stock markets, have enriched the more than 100 million investors who are participating in this prosperity. In fact, this America boom is spearheading a global economic surge. While the American free-market model is often derided as cowboy capitalism, imitation remains the sincerest form of flattery. And it isnt just China, India, and Russia who are acquiescing to the worldwide spread of American capitalism. Its also Eastern Europe and parts of South America. Heck, even the socialists in Old Europe -- like France and Germany -- are getting into the act by reducing individual and corporate tax rates to promote growth.
Note to scared bears and other modern-day class warriors: The best anti-poverty plan is a growing economy, one that creates jobs and higher middle-class living standards. As free enterprise has been unleashed around the world, government planning once again has been rejected. This is the spirit of Adam Smiths Wealth of Nations, where he argued almost 250 years ago for free markets, free trade, and a very light touch with respect to taxes and regulations.
Scared bears should understand the point that if the economy aint broke, theres no need to fix it. Taxing the rich will not make the non-rich rich. Attacking businesses will not produce more jobs and investor-class profits. Imposing trade barriers will not help high-quality, low-cost consumer imports, nor will it promote job-enhancing business exports or help poor nations grow richer.
But the bottom line is the bottom line: As we progress through 2007, the economic state of the union is excellent.
Check out The Wall Street Journal article, entitled Class of 07 Gets Plenty of Job Offers. It talked about employers planning to hire 17 percent more graduates this year than they did last year. This happens to top the college-hiring peak of the last economic boom in 2000.
Yup 2000 was pretty hot, what happened after that... I forget.
ATTENTION SCARED OF YOUR OWN SHADOWS BONDHOLDING BEARS:
The fact that you must data mine and wart doctor for imperfections that support your long failed macro doom scenarios is a very encouraging forward indicator for the US economy, which ex housing continues on its free market, globalized profitfest rampage.
Heres the word of the day at the Jellystone National Park elementary school: CONTEXT.
The meticulously reasoned and uber-graphed permabear doom scenarios which constitute 100% of this blogs content crumble when considered within the CONTEXT of the larger economic environment in which they exist: Full employment, low rates, massive liquidity, low taxation, rising wages, increasing globalization, bodacious corporate profits, low p/e and high return domestic and international equity markets, etc., etc., etc., etc.
Put your housing graphs and meticulously tortured hand-wringing in the proper CONTEXT, and you will perhaps finally experience that tender moment of understanding why youve been 100% wrong lo these many years, and will continue to be wrong in 07 and beyond.
The Goldilocks economy continues to be the greatest story never told, and we are truly blessed to live in the greatest country on planet earth which continues to provide us with incredible opportunities.
The demise of the U.S. has been predicted on and off for most of my life. As a kid there was the Cuban missile crisis and personal bomb shelters. In the 70's stagflation was going to sink us. In the 80's everyone predicted we'd turned into a banana republic by Japan in just a couple years. Just before it's breakup in the early 90's a good many people (including the CIA) thought the USSR might actually be winning the cold war. Now the doomsayers say Islamo-fascism is on the rise and we have no answer. And Iraq has destroyed our credibility and sapped our will. And China is on the rise and will soon overtake us.
The doomfreaks always have and always will speak with the certainty of the righteous that one and only one outcome is possible.
And betting against the US will continue to be a sucker bet.
Im sorry America isnt working for you, I hear the weather is nice in Havana this time of year.
ITS BEGINNING TO DAWN ON ME WHY SCARED BEARS CAN'T GET IT RIGHT.
BEARS tend to spend all of their time analyzing historical or coincidental data that has long ago been discounted by a forward looking stock market. Its already in the price. The market always looks forward but BEARS continues to navigate the investment highway while looking out the rear view mirror. They are totally preoccupied with yesterday's newspaper. This is a profound fundamental analytical flaw that deploys a methodology that will never let the player get out in front of the curve.
BEARS play a backward looking game, while the market always plays a forward looking game. And right now, the market is focused on the 2H of '07 while BEARS are still flogging and analyzing old and irrelevant trucking, housing and retail data.
Its like looking for the answer to growing more, bigger and better corn or cattle without ever having stepped outside of your dark and cold cave.
The BEAR persona is best described as the "ARTICULATE INCOMPETENT."
Poor old SCARED BEARS are hiding in their caves lest they get disemboweled from the bulls who are fully in charge of the financial markets. The usual lunatic-fringe, stuck-on-stupid cave dwellers here cant seem to grasp that housing is only 6% of the economy, and even the most SCARED of BEARY predictions would result in housing impacting GDP by 1%. RUN. HIDE. BUT - dont forget to cover your SHORTS while youre at it. COVER COVER COVER.
LOVE this astute prediction from BEARY DOOMHOLZ DJIA 6,800:
NEXT BEAR SCRIPT: We are in UNCHARTED TERRITORY and NOBODY could have known how the housing market would play out.
Contrast that to the VERY RECENT PAST (or even presently) where Bubbleheads screamed with the CERTAINTY OF THE RIGHTEOUS that this time is NO DIFFERENT from the past and the nuclear winter outcome was CAST IN STONE. No other outcome is possible. This is a sure sign of a single cell organism incapable of understanding housing and autos in the CONTEXT of the larger economy.
100 million Americans are FEASTING on porridge which is JUST RIGHT while bears tremble in their caves gnawing on Billys frozen burritos.
BEARY DOOMHOLZis one of my favorite PERMABEARS along with Billy here. BEARY missed his 06 djia prediction by a mere 5,000 clicks!
NOW, ONLY 52-WEEKS LATER, HE IS FORECASTING DJIA 13220, UP 76%? HELLO?
PERFORMANCE NUMBERS? BEARY doesnt need no stinkin PERFORMANCE NUMBERS.
He doesnt keep score by the accuracy of his predictions. He is constantly out trolling for like-minded lunatics who see the world in the very same way that he sees the world. Its easier to find those folks and then convert them into fee-paying clients than it is to find the truth or accuracy.
Its the oldest game in town. These guys keep score on the basis of how much money they have under management or subscriber count and the fees that this generates...being right or wrong is only a SIDE-SHOW at best.
Funny how BEARY goes nuts when an economic number occasionally mirrors his bearish views... for that instant, they are always legit ... but when the number goes the other way, as they usually do, they are manipulated and part of a huge conspiracy.
BLAME THE INACCURATE DATA GENERATED BY MISLEADING REPORTERS WHO CONSIPIRE TO KEEP FOLKS STUPID.
Troll. Why do you care if we talk amoung aourselves and share data?
If we're not participating in the run up, so what. Its always cyclic.
Personally, I've never predicted the demise of the US. But this will be the third real estate cycle of my life. It goes up and down quite a bit in California. For some reason the nation will join us this time.
Can HaloScan be foreced to have the letter matching... stop this spam.
As to be holed in my cave... Naaa. My investments have done fine.
I blogged about the increasing intensity of anti-bear anon posts.
Neil - enjoy them while you can, this sh*t is funnier than Colbert by a freaking country mile. If I was one of their writers I'd be cutting and pasting & making it a nightly biz focus.
There is a orchestrated conspiracy out there to lie to and deceive the public. The Permabears "sources" tell them that the daily tsunami of bullish data is being manufactured in an illegal Tennessee buorbon distillary behind the Big Red Barn that houses unnatural farm animals. You know the Red Barn, the one where the black helicopters take off and the space ships land.
BEARS ARE NOT TURNING BULLISH...THEY ARE TURNING BULLS@#T:
1-Accuse the data collectors and data providers as being incompetent and conspiring to mislead and keep everyone misinformed. The world is burried under an avalanche of bad information.
2-Nitpick, twist and cherrypick the intentionally bad and misleading data until it supports your failed case that has been wrong for years. Correct the bad information.
3-Never admit that you have been wrong or made some mistakes, its the "irrational" market that's been wrong. You are smarter than the market.
4-Explain everything away and blame everyone and everything else
for your mistakes.
5-Keep everyone off balance and in the dark, that way you can flip/flop whenever its convenient for you to do so. When in doubt, talk louder.
Such BEARS exhibit certain psychological traits and behavioral patterns that do not inspire confidence and trust. They are in the wrong business, their skills are more suited to growing mushrooms.
We are not talking economics here, we are talking MENTAL INSTABILITY!
They will hibernate until the next spring and then emerge, dust-off their old B.S. ; put a little lipstick, rouge and a tight red-leather skirt on it and then recycle their stale old B.S. arguments again and again just like they have been doing for decades. Others will just be reduced to stuck-on-stupid, glooming and dooming Wart Doctors, who contribute nothing but cherry-picking and pointing at anything that supports their failed case and accusing all the other data as being the product of some kind of conspiracy.
The "tapped out consumer," their favorite black & white re-run, will get revived more times than Nick Nolte during a hellacious weekend.
Why is it a surprising that the economy continues to do well? There has been way too much drinking of the kool-aid around this blog vis-a-vis the housing market and the overweening desire to find data that will fit the hypothesis that the housing sector is poised to pull-down the overall economy. Macro and micro-economic data-mining for any little validation to thinly support the years-old lament that the current state of the economy is anything less than a boom evidently never gets old with some.
For a reality check look through the bear masks and see a fairly strong economic foundation: growing real wages, crazy-strong corporate profits, an export boosting weak dollar.
If one fixates on the troubles in housing, it is not too hard to find statistics that promise 45% declines, etc. What is missing in most of the discussion is that RFI is roughly 5%-6% of the economy, and the biggest problems are in a very narrow segment of the market - subprime lending, which is roughly 7% of the housing market. Hence, we are looking at 7% of 5% of the economy: 0.35%. If housing impacts 15% of the economy because of sympathetic spending, that roughs out to a 1% GDP decline. That is IF the doomsday bear scenario plays out as meticulously scripted which it has not.
One thing is certain: If you have been anything but long and strong you've been wrong (investing wise). From a trader's perspective, fighting the tape is always a losing battle. The trend remains up, momentum is positive, seasonal strength is upon us, and the bears and shorts have been vanquished.
Interesting ...The last time I saw troll bombing runs like this was in 2000; the worst was from the dot com bums who were about to be fired (and knew it) and the sales people who were just beginning to suspect they were next to go to slaughter.
That implies this current run of trash-talk must be from a mortgage bum who knows the game is over.
But either way no sense in providing feed to troll or a man-cow walking into the charnel house: One will simply continue to shriek and make threats until it is drowned and the other will only bellow until it is shot, trussed and gutted. Why waste time in chit chat with such?
Hey, look at Doomie's posts. They're only a minute apart. He spends days composing them in MS Word then Copy/Pastes them here en masse.
Cripes Doomie, I agree that the economy is doing great. So, why not get yourself a job? Make some friends??
perhaps it was computer generated... like that spam that doesn't make sense... unreal....
If it is a spam program, I want a copy.
Seriously, I went over to Colbert's site to see if I could find an email address to their writers - they would hardly have to change a thing. SC would deliver that like money... er make that gold.
The only thing that would be even better would be to have Ritholz on as a guest the same night. Priceless.
No luck though - if somebody knows anyone there... CALL THEM.
Neil - enjoy them while you can, this sh*t is funnier than Colbert by a freaking country mile. If I was one of their writers I'd be cutting and pasting & making it a nightly biz focus.
Damn the guy is good.
It is good. But its just throwing at us all the ammo we'll see for the next year. I'm reading... learning...
But as this is SoCal... I'm starting to hear about people I know being released...
Interesting ...The last time I saw troll bombing runs like this was in 2000; the worst was from the dot com bums who were about to be fired (and knew it) and the sales people who were just beginning to suspect they were next to go to slaughter.
I remember this. I went from being very bullish on dotcoms to bearsh in 1999. By early 2000 any mention of bearishness was a trigger for Trolling. It got worse and worse as the year progressed and the Nasdaq delcined. I had coworkers get very frustrated as I talked about their dotbomb stocks being overvalued.
Me? I splurged with my NASDAQ profits on the car I'm still driving. Sigh... soon time to get a new one.
I did blog this not too long ago.
Since these guys probably won't have their DSL cut off for 60 to 90 days, we'll see a lot of it through 2007. Cest la vie.
"We are not talking economics here, we are talking MENTAL INSTABILITY!
Funny Circus Bears"
I agrreen we are talking mental instabilty but, since we're descending into stupidity-it takes one to know one, it bounces off of me and sticks to you, etc, etc, etc.
MONEY has obtained more than 100 e-mails and faxes sent by loan officers to appraisers across the country. The language varies from asking if a predetermined value was possible to promising more business if a number could be hit.
"Many homeowners are finding out that the equity they were led to believe they had in their house is not actually there," says John Taylor, president of the National Community Reinvestment Coalitio
The troll posts are a perfect example of what is wrong with our society in general.
A whole heck of a lot of misplaced energy and productivity!
If that boob spent just half his misdirected energy on something productive ... he could cure cancer ... or something ) jeeezzz
Anyway ... I really like Tanta's 1,2,3 plan
'1. People who are struggling but could make the loan work with a reasonable modification should get one...
2. People who cannot carry their loans or sell their homes need to get foreclosed ...
3. If the borrower was a victim of predation, you make the lender cancel the loan... '
Sort of like everyone has to stick their finger in the light socket ... so it won't happen again (as easily). ONE caveat though ... the people that fall under (#1) get a BIG DING on their credit score.
"Financially strapped subprime mortgage lender New Century Financial Corp., failed to receive any bids for its mortgage loan origination business, forcing it to shut down the unit and lay off around 2,000 employees, the company told employees Thursday."
I, personally, I am glad to have our great country defended in these comments.
Though Thomas Jefferson failed to include "farting through silk" in the Declaration of Independence (probably because Sally Hemings was sitting on his [rhymes with race]), I would say that it is included in the penumbra of the Declaration.
Go Bulls! Defend the country.
It is interesting, to me at least, that one of the Bull commenters included a rosy future for the American consumer in his calculations.
When it comes to the American consumer (who has no savings, whatever else he may have), it's all about psychology.
Well, well, well. Mr. Flood had quite the party last night after I went to bed.
Would it surpise anyone to know that Tremulous Old Billy, OilyAnalDischarge, Funny Circus Bears, Beary Fan, MisCalculated Risk, Beary Shitholz Fan, Circus Bears, Bears With Salsa In Their Thon, Financial Midgets In Denial, Odd Lotters In Denial, Capitalist Pig, and Doomsters In Denial were all using the same laptop last night?
It must have been a great party. One friendless, witless little loser, sitting around with nothing to do on a Thursday night, pretendin' to be an entire frat house unto himself on the internet. And he so like totally pwned us!
Dear Sock Jock o' many names: you try pulling this crap again some evening when I happen to be still up, and I'll go in and keep changing your handle back to Sock Jock on all your worthless posts. There's a great big internet out there; you don't have to spend all your sociopathic energies here.
Hovnanian Enterprises Inc. said on Friday its second-quarter loss would be bigger than it had previously expected, as the subprime mortgage crisis exacerbated weakness in the moribund home-building sector
Kmart same-store sales were down 4.7 percent for the first 12 weeks of the 13-week first quarter, primarily due to lower transaction volumes in a majority of stores.
Sears U.S. same-store sales declined by 2.4 percent, primarily reflecting a reduction in home appliances sales.
The company said it believes the decrease reflects a slower U.S. housing market and increased competition, and is partially offset by an improvement in children's apparel sales.
Same-store sales, or sales at stores open at least a year, are a key measure of retailer performance because they measure growth at existing stores rather than from newly opened ones.
Shocking news Tanta! But I should be ashamed of: unfettered laughter at the handle "bears with salsa in their thon" (misspelled creativity too much for me) and wondering if David Lereah has too much time on his hands between jobs...
bless you for police work - i am mostly outraged with you..haahaahaha..salsa...
Next up:
Government program to provide assistance to mortgage companies who have suffered losses by being unable to legally forclose on non-performimg mortgages due to emergency no-foreclosure moratoriums.
Next next up: assistance for investors in Mortgage-backed securities who suffered losses due to losses in the underlying portfolio due to mortgage companies being unable to... whatever.
Formula for foreclosure: resets, no equity
Formula for foreclosure: resets, no equity (Page 1 of 4)
More than 1.1 million homeowners will lose their homes to foreclosure by 2014 because they can't afford the rising payments on their adjustable-rate mortgages, according to a researcher.
--
"Home Ownership and Equity Protection Act"
It is a disgusting and blatant display of the govt. of the Crooks, by the Crooks, and for the Crooks.
There is no provision under the Constitution of the United States for any such thing as "Home Ownership and Equity Protection."
We must save the Bankrupters and Fraudsters of New York City. That is why we created the Fraudulent Reserve System in the first place. Moral Hazard be damned. Yeah, talk about Moral Hazard doesn't do any good.
The probability of the collapse of the American political system goes up every day that BFNYC have the control of the economy and the govt. One day it will happen. No later than 2029.
Jas
The problem is that almost anything that they do to prevent or limit new subprime or risky loans will make it that much more difficult for people who are already in trouble to sell or refinance. This is a really difficult situation, with no obvious solution to me.
MA Declares Moratorium On Foreclosures
The division will then call the lender and ask them not to forclose.
Wow, that was easy.
I don't want to know what they'll propose to do..
How about abusive borrowing?
The "Home Ownership and Equity Protection Act (HOEPA)"
OK, I know the FED silently strays out of bounds frequently, but in my view this is clearly a case where it's going out of the stadium and into another state.
There are supposed to be 2 principal concerns for the FED addressed by implementing policy: Inflation containment & Employment bounding. They clearly have an impact on the strength of dollar by default as a consequence of any policy decisions, even though it's not their mandate. They also address any concerns over the stability of the banking system as regulators and measure their impacts over the financial markets. OK.
But, since when have they been put in charge of protecting asset prices. Who decided Home Equity Protection is within their mandate. It's troubling when the FED openly broadens their scope. WHo holds the reins, The Supreme Court?
A moratorium on foreclosures?
Well, I was considering that $500,000 dollar house, but heck, why not make it $2 million if I don't have to worry about any pesky foreclosures breathing down my neck?
I have been through some tuff times in life...where was my help when i needed it most? I have owned my house for 15 years...why can i not have my rate lowered to help me keep a little more of my (2 jobs) paycheck....this is BS. Why even bother having a credit score system if they are going to bail all thses sub-prime borrowers out? BS
Folks, HOEPA has been around since 1994. I don't remember which clever nitwit named it HOEPA, but it's not exactly unconstitutional.
It was enacted specifically to go after the predatory practice known as "equity skimming" or "equity stripping." It had and has nothing to do with supporting home prices. It's meant to keep bottom-feeder predatory lenders from doing "serial refinances" on usurious terms that end up eating away all the borrower's original equity in the loan being refinanced. It came up with something called the "benefit to borrower" rule where you had to show that a refi was actually providing some true financial benefit to the borrower; otherwise a refi that kept worsening the borrower's LTV simply by increasing the loan amount each time was considered predatory.
Of course they called it "HOEPA" because those are focus-group-tested-happy words. But you notice that 13 years later it hasn't brought the constitution to its knees.
barely,
The mandate you have in mind, the mandate for monetary policy, is not the only mandate the Fed has. It is also a regulatory institution. The law cited requires the Fed to guard against abusive lending, whatever that may be. The Fed is an arm of government. when Congress instructs the Fed to undertake a certain task, odds are the Fed will.
Bloomberg's second story on this hearing, right after the simple press release, took the view that the Fed is holding this hearing because Congress is leaning on the Fed get involved in this problem, as required by law. I would not be too surprised to see the Fed drag its feet in actually doing anything about abusive lending.
RE: MA moratorium on foreclosures
I demand a moratorium on rent collection.
Dammit, just because I signed the lease, doesn't mean I should have to make the payment.
I also demand forgiveness from past and future tenant lease obligations. This predation from the greedy landlords has got to stop. I want freedom from rent payments. Yeah, I lied and said I made that much money and could pay, but I can't. I should be guaranteed forgiveness because, well...just because, alright!! I'm in America, isn't that enough?
I want, I want, I want...this is the USA, gimme what I want, damn you.
But seriously, doesn't this set (initiate) a new precedent for contract law that a signature doesn't hold one accountable for the contract? Any lawyers out there want to nibble that one? Does this slope slip a bit? And how big is that bit?
Thank you for this site.
So people who borrowed more than they could afford are going to get some help?!
If the govt subsidizes some of my down-payment, I will gladly make sure one of the forclosed homes in my area will not go unused. Why should I use my money in the smart way if Congress is going to do something dumb like this?
I was actually referring to this I saw on Reuters...
Community groups that help subprime borrowers try to save their homes from foreclosure would receive $300 million in aid under legislation introduced on Thursday. The infusion of federal money would help consumer groups reach out to troubled borrowers and, in some cases, provide new financing directly.
Forclosure moratorium- that should give lenders food for thought when making future lending decisions in MA.
dotcommunist, I wouldn't worry about contract law collapsing. There are laws such as the Fair Trade Act, in particular, that guard against unfair, misleading and deceptive business practices. The test there is whether the average consumer would be likely to be misled.
HOEPA probably needs to be expanded to give the Fed enough authority to do all it should, but there is certainly no bar under current law for bringing actions in some situations.
PS: I am not going to argue with those who claim that some borrowers knew what they were doing. It is obvious that they did. But when you have 70 year olds who had their houses nearly paid off and who now find themselves in an absolutely untenable situation, there is adequate room to bring a case. Everyone who got rooked by these mortgages was not a knowing participant.
Question for you pundits -
What makes up "professional services" in the ISM report? What kind of jobs does this sector cover?
Regards,
ISM services index shows robust growth - MarketWatch
PS: I am not going to argue with those who claim that some borrowers knew what they were doing. It is obvious that they did. But when you have 70 year olds who had their houses nearly paid off and who now find themselves in an absolutely untenable situation, there is adequate room to bring a case. Everyone who got rooked by these mortgages was not a knowing participant.
MaxedOutMama
MOM: The gov't and all its various RE/mortgage progams and tax incentives are unending. More tax payer dollars going into maintaining the RE industry/HB industry/mortgage indusry. All we seem to be getting from this money is higher priced homes.
New Century gets no bids, lays off 2,000 workers
New Century Financial of Irvine received no bids for its loan-making unit and is laying off about 2,000 employees, the Associated Press reports.
Mortgage Insider : The Orange County Register
http://www.builderonline.com/industry-news.asp?sectionID=26&articleID=490694
good article: a bit below:
McPherron, on the other hand, says he wouldn't be surprised if home sales were still soft well into the summer months, even though year-over-year comparisons could improve. And if the trend set in March continues, as the numbers suggest, into April, May, and beyond, the many sellers who are struggling to make their mortgage payments and holding out desperately for a spring buying boom could be in for a shock, at least, and foreclosure at worst.
"Many people think, 'if I can just hang on 'til the spring,' they will get an offer," says McPherron. "This spring, they'll be lucky to sell."
MoM: I'm having a hard time picturing how 70 year olds who are close to payoff are victims of predatory lending. It would seem that if they're close to payoff they've had the loans for quite some time (close to 15 to 30 years?) which was way before most of this mess started. Am I missing something?
O.T. but relevant to larger discussion here -- from The Street Light:
As I've discussed before, income growth for households that get their income through their labor has been sluggish during this economic recovery. Profits have been strong, and the income of people who get a lot of their income from their ownership of US corporations has done well... but labor income has generally struggled along at 2-3% real growth for the past several years.
Consumption growth, on the other hand, has been considerably and consistently stronger. How is that possible? There are three ways. First, households have spent an ever-growing portion of their income... so much so that by 2005 the savings rate actually turned consistently negative for the very first time. Second, some American households have enjoyed strong income growth from non-labor sources. I'm referring mostly to those profits that I mentioned above. Third, many households have used mortgage equity withdrawals to finance their consumption.
These various sources of money for households to spend have propped up consumption growth at a solid level despite relatively weak growth in labor income. But there are good reasons to guess that all three of these supports for consumption are running out.
The end of the housing boom and concomitant MEW phenomenon has been well documented by others (yes, I'm talking about Calculated Risk), so that source of money is drying up. Corporate profits have grown amazingly well in recent years, but probably can't continue that pace for much longer.
That leaves changes in the savings rate. But if anything, it is starting to seem like we are entering a phase where households will be more interested in moving their savings rate back toward zero, rather than allow it to become more negative. However, to bring the savings rate back toward zero (not to mention positive) households will have to allow several period elapse with rates of consumption growth below the rate of income growth.
Put it all together, and it seems quite likely to me that we're in for a period of slower consumption growth. And given the importance of consumption in the US's economic growth right now, that does not spell good news for the economy as a whole.
doesn't this set (initiate) a new precedent for contract law that a signature doesn't hold one accountable for the contract?
You don't, really, think that HOEPA is the only law on the federal or state books that regulates the kinds of contracts one can enter into, and the obligations of either party to establish the other party's capacity to perform under the terms, do you?
Do you have any idea how easy it is to get a 70-year old homeowner to sign away her home on a predatory loan that increases her existing mortgage balance only by rolling outrageous points and fees into it--without giving her any cash--and that has some evil balloon clause on it that forces her to keep coming back to you for another refi? You think such a contract should be enforceable? If you do, I hope you die young. You'll need to.
This pretense that because most people understand the notes they sign, everyone does, just blows my mind. Nobody is vulnerable in your world? I once asked where Orange County hid its children. Now I have to wonder where some people hide their elderly.
No legitimate lender has ever had a moment's worry about getting busted on a HOEPA rap. You can take my word for that. I was in the biz back in '94 when HOEPA came out. We all said, "there are lenders who do that? What scum. Send 'em to jail."
And as you notice the mortgage industry didn't collapse under the regulatory burden, nor did anybody's taxes get raised to enforce HOEPA. As a matter of fact, you will notice that the HOEPA era ushered in some major money-making. The problems we are having today are coming in large part because we strayed from the basic concepts of HOEPA, not because of HOEPA.
They were, before they got the cash-out refi. Or the next two, when they couldn't understand why their payments kept zooming up.
There are also non-English speakers who were preyed upon by unscrupulous members of their own ethnic group.
Seriously, there are going to be a number of successful actions. It only takes one Babs (who tells her customer the complete opposite of what the disclosure says) to screw matters up.
Am I missing something?
Yes. You are missing the kind of lending that was common before 1994 and not so common these days.
You may not see a lot of door-to-door siding salesmen wandering neighborhoods conning old ladies into signing HELOC notes with disbursements directly to the "home improvement" company for work that never gets done.
The reason you don't see so much of that these days is because HOEPA put a stop to it.
Yes. You are missing the kind of lending that was common before 1994 and not so common these days.
Ah, I see, this is related to the 1994 HOEPA law as opposed to the new rules being considered. Makes sense now.
Bofiz, it's just new stuff these days, which is why some people think HOEPA needs an overhaul.
Predatory lending is Borg: it adapts. You have to keep remodulating your phaser. HOEPA stopped a lot of really outrageous stuff. And a lot of bottom-feeders who got cut off at the knees by HOEPA went on to some new way to subvert the process.
I just get irritated when the idea is put forth that there are no abusive trade practices, just dumb borrowers who deserve everything they get.
I just discovered a few months ago--along with the rest of the world--that a drug I took six times last year has been pulled off the market because new testing that the manufactuer hid from the FDA shows that in best case, it isn't effective, and in worst case it causes harm to people. And that shit cost almost $2,000 a dose, besides the fact that the side-effects are awful.
My doctor prescribed it, and I trusted my doctor, and I took it. Is someone here willing to tell me that I would have no grounds for suing the manufacturer if it turns out I were harmed? (Fortunately, I seem to be just in the group for which it didn't do anything, and it's my insurance company who gets to sue for its money back if it wants to.)
How about a little "there but for the grace of [insert theological preoccupation of choice] go I?"
Hot off the press - sort of:
House committee votes to make more housing loans available
In a move aimed at heading off more problems in the subprime mortgage market, the House Financial Services Committee approved a bill Thursday that increases federal loan limits in high-cost areas of the country and authorizes lower down payments for borrowers...
The bill also contains a provision to put FHA surpluses into an affordable housing fund...
To become law the full House and Senate would need to approve the bill and the president would need to sign it.
Another one to watch.
This is starting to sound like a classic freedom-vs.-safety question. To what extent are people competent to manage their own affairs? In a realm like this, perhaps not terribly. I still think insiders seriously underestimate the confusing nature of a complex industry often described in impenetrable jargon.
Six months ago, before I started reading this blog, I had never heard of negative-amortization mortgages. As soon as I read Tanta's post on the subject, I went, "Aha! That's what happened to (two friends of mine)."
Here's the story: they're a married couple in their late twenties, weighed down financially with years and years of college debt. In 2004, they decided they wanted a house. They went to their friendly neighborhood mortgage lender (not even a subprime outfit. BoA, I believe), "We want a house. We only have this much money to spend. Can we have one?"
The friendly neighborhood mortgage lender said, "Sure you can!" And they got their house.
Fast-forward to 2007. My friends are trying to sell their house. They discover that the balance on the loan is larger than the original amount of the mortgage. Thankfully, the house has appreciated significantly, but what if it hadn't?
These friends of mine are not stupid people. Nor are they greedy people; both the house and their incomes are quite modest. They try hard to be financially responsible. They just don't know anything.
Where do lending stories like this stop being opportunity and start being exploitation?
CNN money story:
John Devaneys not a developer, and hes certainly not a flipper. The CEO of United Capital Markets is a bond trader. And one of his specialties is buying and selling bonds that are backed by the mortgage payments of ordinary homeowners.
Option ARMs? Devaney loves em. The consumer has to be an idiot to take on those loans, he says. But it has been one of our best-performing investments.
OK, is anyone still confused about who should be blamed for what? Hmmm, the naive, or those who stand to profit the most mightily for suckering the naive and then stripping them of their homes?
Moody's, S&P Understate Subprime Risk, Study Says (Update1)
By Mark Pittman
May 3 (Bloomberg) -- Moody's Investors Service, Standard & Poor's and Fitch Ratings understate the risks of subprime mortgage bonds, putting funding for the U.S. housing industry at risk, according to a study to be released today.
Moody's, S&P Understate Subprime Risk, Study Says (Update2) - Bloomberg.com
Las Vegas sales
March 2007: 3496
April 2007: 3167
April 2006: 4121
March 2006: 3423
Listed Vs sold:
2005: 58%
2006: 38%
2007: 25%
In Condo market the decline this month (both Mom and YoY ) is even greater.
Agree with the above comment about freedom vs. safety. Not sure the govt. should be bailing out folks who made bad business deals. The buyers signed the papers. They should've asked the question whether they could afford a $500,000 mortgage on a $40,000 salary. Local story in Sacramento about a guy who bought 6 homes on a $40K salary! And he signed loan apps that mistated his income!
Obviously, the mortgage brokers who were encouraging folks to falsify applications need to be reigned in.
"Forclosure moratorium- that should give lenders food for thought when making future lending decisions in MA"
deb, that was exactly my thought as well. What lender in their right mind would want to lend in a state where the main recourse against non-payment has been effectively eliminated? Talk about unlimited risk potential!
This should have the effect of totally siezing up the MA RE market. I wonder how many other states will follow MA off the cliff?
I'm not in favor of a govt bailout either -- my fantasy is sticking the mortgage brokers' and lenders' noses right down in the mess they made and making them 100 percent responsible. My fantasy would protect the innocent (taxpayers), save money, and have a highly deterrent effect for further collateral-damage prone scams and shenanigans.
However, I recognize that in this nation that prides itself on protecting the rich from what their free markets have wrought, this might not happen.
Therefore, national/state/local govts might be left to try to prop up their own economies and tax bases however they can.
Amadis of Gaul - you nailed it. I tend toward a libertarian stance by instinct, but when you work in a field like banking you realize that enlightened regulation is necessary to make the market WORK. It is possible to send money in circles for long enough to mask the eventual outcome for long enough to swamp good dealing that makes an honest profit with bad dealing that makes a hefty profit. Those hefty profits fund advertising, and bring capital inflows from the market, and pay for plenty of lobbying money.... And they cause boards to ask "why is so-and-so making so much money while we are not?"
Lending, especially consumer lending, is an odd business for honest people. The most ardent rightwinger will develop some liberal tendencies after a few years, and the most pie-in-sky leftwinger will develop some cynical perspectives on human nature in a few years. It all comes down to what works for most people. You can't save them all from bad decisions, but you can reasonably hope to get most of them to understand and reflect on the decision they are making.
How and by what means you develop a reasonable certainty that both parties to a transaction are knowingly signing the contract is not a minor matter easily settled. Your friends should have understood the loan before they signed for it. "Lucky" is not good enough.
The most ardent rightwinger will develop some liberal tendencies after a few years, and the most pie-in-sky leftwinger will develop some cynical perspectives on human nature in a few years
Spot on! That's actually one of the reasons I stayed in the mortgage business for so long. You either shed your knee-jerk platitudes about the world or you get your ass handed to you. You either deal with your customers as people--real people, not "rational agents" of economic theory or piteous characters in some morality play--or you fail.
One reason the market is so distorted right now is because the ass-handing has been delayed for too long by endless capital infusions and a great deal of hand-clapping for Tinkerbell. But I will say that one "liberal" tendency I have never got erased by my business, and that is the belief that you pick on someone your own size. Encouraging people to take Option ARMs on a stated income deal is like some teenage bully tempting a five-year-old to pull the pin on the fire extinguisher.
Anybody who wants to take sides in the investment bank-rating agency-mortgage servicer circular firing squad debate is free to do so. Some days I'm tempted to conclude they all deserve each other and we should just let them play Darwin until some party evolves sapience. But to let vulnerable homeowners get caught up in that out of some fetish about "freedom"? Not for me. The borrower may not have known what he was doing when he signed that note, but I did if I was his lender. If I can't justify the deal afterwards, you should come after me. I'm supposed to know what I'm doing in exchange for a federal forking bank charter.
Excellent post on piggington by a REO broker
A small excerpt:
"I called a couple of local REO brokers to get a feel of what the business is like these days. Here is what I heard:
Hearsay #1 early or first payment defaults are truly intentional. Borrowers maxed out on a cash-out refinance and then simply wait for the foreclosure process to finally end when the Marshall removed them from the premises, often a year or more from when they first stop payment. This behavior is not only irresponsible but it surprised me that so many are knowledgeable enough to choose this way out.
Hearsay #2 all REO brokers have more business than they can handle, even as more brokers are reclassifying themselves as REO specialists. Based on the numbers that I was told, REO volume has indeed surpassed the worst of times in SD since the early 1980s.
Hearsay #3 asset management companies are more prevalent than previous cycles. In other words, lenders/servicers outsource REO disposition to a third party who then contracts with individual brokers where the REOs may be located. These asset management companies are swamped nationwide, hence the auctions in hope of disposing properties in volume.
Hearsay #4 REOs had been clogged in the pipeline because lenders were slow in reacting to the rapidly declining market. They are now at a point of realization and are adjusting prices accordingly. If this auction proves to be disappointing, the lenders are likely to be far more aggressive."
Guest Commentary: Ramsey on Foreclosure Auctions and More | Piggington's Econo-Almanac | San Diego Housing Bubble News and Analysis
Tanta: What do you think of the proposal by Sen. Schumer and others to "establish a fudiciary duty" for mortgage brokers? In other words, brokers would be obligated to act in the best interests of borrowers, and if they didn't, they could be sued.
From Schumer's press release today:
"Legislation to Hold Mortgage Brokers and Originators Accountable: The bill seeks to regulate mortgage brokers and originators under the Truth in Lending Act (TILA) by establishing on behalf of consumers a fiduciary duty and other standards of care. In addition, the bill outlines standards for brokers and originators to assess a borrower's ability to repay a mortgage and holds lenders accountable for brokers and appraisers. The enforcement mechanism applied to this new section is those that currently apply under TILA."
I'm not cheering for a bailout by any stretch, but I wonder if one of the most important solutions to the problem is turning mortgage brokers into fiduciaries.
I have lots and lots of clueless-friends mortgage stories, but a common thread seems to be the naive assumption that the guy across the desk doesn't want to screw them over. I don't think the thought ever crosses their minds that what's best for the broker isn't also necessarily best for them. Believe it or not, they trust loan officers too.
They come away from these transactions HAPPY because they get what they want and don't have a clue that they've just been taken. An older gentleman who's another friend of mine was delighted with the broker who steered him into a no-doc because it was "easier," even though I'm sure he would have had no trouble documenting his income and assets. He actually recommended her to me, like he thought she was being nice to him and doing him a favor. It's pitiable.
Shouldn't we make all of these loan reps what people actually think they are?
early or first payment defaults are truly intentional.
No, really? Tell us something we don't know.
It has been a while since I did a post on buy-backs; maybe I should do one again.
There is a reason why every loan sale contract says you have to buy back an EPD loan, regardless of whether it met the rules or not.
The reason is because EPDs are not innocent situations. In all my years in the business, I have seen three EPD loans I can remember that were not fraudulent on someone's part. In all cases they involved a borrower who was injured or incapacitated like two days after closing. As I recall, all three of them got worked out just fine by the mortgage servicer.
The other 99.9% of EPDs are people who never intended to make a payment. That's why they're worthless.
Traditional underwriting and due diligence can really weed a lot of those out. The point to bear in mind is that never before in the history of the secondary market in mortgages have we ever seen EPD rates like we have in the last two or three years. Maybe human nature changed, but I tend to think that lenders stopped trying to control the quality of their loan pipelines. It was assumed that a few bad apples wouldn't spoil the whole barrel. Yep.
Amadis,
The same thing happens in other areas of financial services. How many unsuspecting, frequently elderly people are sold low performing mutual funds through life insurance or annuities? How many knew the "Investment Consultant" was receiving hidden fees out of their money?
What do you think of the proposal by Sen. Schumer and others to "establish a fudiciary duty" for mortgage brokers?
I think it's the key to a great deal of the problem. It will change the industry dramatically. And that's a good thing.
Think of it this way: in this day and age, what do you need a broker for when we're talking mortgage loans?
Sure, if I wanted to buy a named diamond, or I were trying to sell the Dowager Empress of Bohemia's tea set, I would probably hire a broker to find a buyer or seller for me.
Mortgage lenders aren't exactly that hard to find. What with the net and all, not even people who live in East Jesus have no access to a lender.
Therefore nobody needs a broker just to find loans. They need a broker to find them good loans. If I am a lender and I want to hire a broker, I want that broker to bring me good customers. I got all the nitwits I need from my website.
Seriously. If the broker isn't representing some party in a fiduciary relationship, then the broker is doing nothing but adding to the consumer's costs by being a middleman with its hand out for fees.
Considering there are still 17 states to adopt the nontraditional guidelines that were introduced in 2005 I wouldn't hold my breath for the Fed.
FYI, some good stuff from Mason & Rosner on their paper here: Hudson Institute >
Hudson Upcoming Events Detail
Tanta-
Do you have a "manifesto posting" in which you've laid out your thoughts on how the mortgage system should be reformed?
It would make a nice link to put on the CR homepage - just for background and as a framework for people who haven't thought this through and/or have the experience.
Another reason - you've said the media doesn't really understand the issues. I assume you don't think they know the correct solution either. For a reporter, manifestos are very, very handy to have. I'm not planning on ripping you off (I rarely write on mortgage markets - I'm just fascinated/appalled by the car wreck element of the whole debt bubble) but I know other reporters do read this site.
Ta,
Rob
Rob, you know I keep threatening to write a manifesto--I haven't written one since my college days--no, you don't need to know what that was about--but it's just finding time, energy, and inspiration all lining up on the same day that's the problem.
And don't think for a minute I'd be annoyed if reporters wanted to use it. I just want to make them credit a blog instead of some dipshit industry shill or think panzer outfit. In fact, if I thought I could make the NYT do that, I'd get busy writing the manifesto.
So don't stop bugging me for it. I'm hard to manage, but not impossible to manage. (I actually have a reference from a former boss that says those exact words.)
Warning Flames likely ahead.
Wow.. The holy wrath of god and right to contract folks have come out in force here. I agree with Tanta, lighten up people. As satisfying as self-sanctimoniousness feels, it generally dumb, and grade school level juvenile. This blog is all about dumping the hype and using your brains, not the part of your anatomy you sit on.
While it is true that these greedy and/or trusting fools put themselves in their situations by signing on the dotted line, it may surprise you that, as constitutional and god given as the right to contract is, the law puts the onus on BOTH parties to the contract to mitigate or avoid forseeable disasters. This is particularly the case when one of the parties has a higher level of knowledge and should have known better. Government also has the duty to make sure our citizens play nice together and enforce a level as possible playing field. It is in society's best interest that this be so. (See, Anti-trust laws)
You don't buy up "stumpage rights" from small land owners and clear cut millions of acres of forest and then deny you had no clue that an ecological disaster was going to happen and besides, you were contractually allowed to do so. The judge is going to find a special place for you in the slammer, believe me.
No one is suggesting that the borrowers be let off scott-free, and I'm guessing that that will not happen. But just like in Bankruptcy, society and the government have an interest in making sure the SYSTEM (not the borrowers) is fair and has been stabilized. (Surprisingly policy-wise Bankruptcy is not simply a mechanism to let people get away with welching on their debts (I'll ignore the fact that most bankruptcies happen from medical or divorce and not because of freeloaders), but the decision that we as a society are better off having them be producing members of society and not under a huge un-payable pile of debt, unable to feed themselves. It also serves as an enforcement mechanism against predatory lenders.)
The greedy borrower's made their nodoc negam bargains and are going to be stuck with at least a portion of that millstone. However, as the second greedy party to the bargain, the lenders will also have to play a part in the work out of any disasters. In particular, because they KNEW better (knew as in a sophisticated, specific, historical, amoritization table/CPA ability-to-pay kind of knew), they also wrote the contracts, and, as they were the ones most able to avoid the disaster (Gee, loan denied! You don't qualify/get the cash) the law will probably see them as more than a little at fault.
The bottom line -- this is a freaking disaster for our society and very few people that were parties to this are going to have blamelessly clean hands in the end. When fire starts raging through the neighborhood it's best to stop bickering and help put out the flames or your own house may burn. If on later investigation into the cause it turns
If on later investigation into the cause it turns out that one neighbor sold the pyromaniac kid next door gasoline when they knew it was likely for them to have matches somewhere, well, it is going to be hard for them to claim that they had a right to contract to sell gas.
calm down, Tanta, it was tongue-in-cheek. Nevertheless, you wrote:
This pretense that because most people understand the notes they sign, everyone does, just blows my mind.
My underlying point refers to exactly that. Why a moratorium if, in your words, most people understand the notes they sign?
Sure, there are plenty of victims, so should we let all the liars and cheaters get away, too?
"Seriously. If the broker isn't representing some party in a fiduciary relationship, then the broker is doing nothing but adding to the consumer's costs by being a middleman with its hand out for fees."
Yeah, you nailed it -- a middleman collecting his toll. A useless moron who has somehow managed to create for himself an impassable toll both on the bridge between the real buyer and the real seller -- preferably with Congressional or "Legislated Trade Group" backing. Think NRA, AMA, etc.
Also known as "Rent Seeking", or "Making (Grabbing) a Ton of Green by doing almost nothing". Our Great, 21st Century, Morally-Putrid, American Uber-Innovation. Look around, everywhere you turn your head, what do you see -- every would-be "New Economy Genius" beating their 6 brain cells trying to come up with an "innovation" on the Pet Rock theme. "Gee, if only I could come up with a way to pick up rocks off the ground for free and sell them for a huge profit, I'd be as Happy as a Pig in a Wallow!"
I keep laughing when I read the crap coming out of the Fed, Congress, the financial know-it-alls with regard to "financial innovation"! There's no "innovation" in fraud, deceit, scamming, ponzi, and 3 Card Monty schemes -- that's as old as the Bronze Age. What is "innovative" about loan programs that try to mask the truth -- the damn property is too freakin much money for the poor bastard to afford -- EVER.
But this environment of fraud, scam, deceit, phoney-baloney is all around us -- Real Estate only being the latest and most Headline Grabbing. Just look at the current White House Administration and the House of Clowns called Congress. Just look at the 401(K) scams whereby your Great Father -Figure Employer farms out the paperwork management of your 401(K) to some 2-bit Boozo who basically does nothing Value-Added and takes a whopping chunk of your retirement for that "Service" -- and HIDES tha fact to boot! Yeah, for all you numskulls who don't know about this one -- just Google lawsuit + 401(K) and see what you come up with -- and don't be surprised to find your own Employer's 401(K) plan mentioned.
Ask almost anyone today what their ideal path to a successful life is -- especially those under 40 years of age -- it's likely to be some form of Rent Seeking activity.
I could go on with 150,000 examples -- but what's the point -- it's right there in our faces -- either you see or you don't. The Simple Moral Value -- that you should Deserve (Earn) What You Get has been lost, The Simple Moral Value that Leaches Are Bad For the Human Race and should be SQUASHED ON SIGHT has been lost.
--Andrew
it may surprise you that, as constitutional and god given as the right to contract is, the law puts the onus on BOTH parties to the contract to mitigate or avoid forseeable disasters.
Talk about a puff piece post, Abraham Lincoln wiped his ass with the constitution in the war between the states and the constitution is seen now as a living document. The War Between the States was all about business and had nothing to do with slavery except maybe for the use as a bargaining chip. Wilson finished what remained of the constitution off and one of his gifts was the FED, which was also about business, in this case the business of banks and moral hazard.
I also don't happen to know anyone that was touched on the shoulder by GOD and told they have a right to squat especially when it comes to a mortgage contract.
As usual (with an accent on the "usu"), when the heat starts to singe the little toesies of the chiselers on relief, who do people look to?
Well, it isn't the Ghost Busters.
It's the lenders. It's all their fault. Boo hoo hoo.
C'mon. Give me a break. The lenders have been doing everything in their power to explain and clarify the usurious terms of their loans. There are guys in Brooklyn with baseball bats gathering dust in the back of the room, crying their eyes out in envy of today's lenders.
Here's an analogy. All the Democrats say they were tricked into voting to invade Iraq. Do you believe them? Hell, no. They knew there were no WMD's. They knew an extraordinarily sophisticated guerrilla force would oppose us for years and years, killing thousands of our troops. They knew the country would sink into anarchy. Who are they trying to kid?
We're in big trouble when people start casting aspersions on the selfless lenders who have made this country great.
Dotcommunist, not only have I never advocated for a foreclosure moratorium, I seem to recall having written a fairly caustic post about that not long ago wherein I observed that it wouldn't do much more than increase accrued interest costs for borrowers who were going to lose their homes anyway.
So don't ask me to defend that one. I will only observe that it's rather like the arguments about the death penalty to me. I do not wish to see the guilty go unpunished. I would rather see all the guilty be spared the death penalty than to execute one innocent person. Since there are alternatives to the death penalty, I see no reason to insist that there will be no punishment if there are no executions.
I am not interested in judicial vengeance on the subject of mortgage lending. So there it is.
How about a little "there but for the grace of [insert theological preoccupation of choice] go I?"
Tanta: I totally agree. But there's plenty of fraud to go around these days it seems. Not all of the fraudsters were lenders; some of 'em were borrowers who lied about their income and other stuff too.
We definitely need some sort of government regulations so that borrowers are made very much aware of what the term "negative amortization" means if there's the slightest possibility that they're getting into that kind of loan, for example.
But I worry about any bailouts that will rescue people who engaged in risky economic behavior - that will just encourage more of said behavior.
And then there was an article linked here a bit further up about how the House has voted to allow FHA loans with smaller downpayments (3% isn't small enough?) and higher loan limits. That just seems crazy at this point.
Tanta, I must have missed your earlier posting on a moratorium.
However, my biggest grievance is that the predatory lending caused an imbalance in affordability that will only be re-balanced if things like foreclosures are allowed to proceed. While that significant house price decline is not desired by 2/3 of the country, it is still needed and healthy to restore balance. It seems that our bubble makers have the notion that if they can stop the REO tsunami from taking down house prices, they will get their much-touted 'soft landing'. The derivative pitchmen would also love that outcome. Didn't ex-Fed head Lucifer Greenhole just mention that a 10% increase in prices will solve everything?
Yeah, except for anyone who doesn't already have a house, and the future generations who aren't lucky enough to inherit one.
Something about that hoped-for outcome strikes me as an extremely good attempt at eroding the middle class further.
And that is why a foreclosure moratorium is bad, and only bad.
How's this: Create a foreclosure review board that will review each one to determine the level of lender predation. Those who were truly victimized will have the lender get forced to rework the loan (provided Ranieri can get all the bondholders to agree). The loans that were partly predation and partly cheating/lying irresponsible borrower get foreclosed.
Seriously, a foreclosure moratorium is the new Greenhole Put, or rather, the MBS put.
Beazer Homes Says SEC Conducting Probe
Expired
dotcomm - foreclosures will proceed.
I lived & worked in the Midwest all through the 80s farm crisis... damn near every state from the Rocky Mountains to the Great Lakes & Canadian border to the Gulf of Mexico either considered or enacted 'foreclosure moratoriums'...
Regardless foreclosures all eventually went through.
You couldn't even consider them a speed bump so many farms went bust so fast.
All the moratoriums did was allow the pols to (1) show they care - this was before 'feel my pain'... and (2) buy time to figure out how big a sponge they'll need to sop up the spilled milk.... needed one m/f big sponge.
What did the farmers get out of it? The opportunity to plant and harvest one more crop that came in at a loss (commodity prices were so low then as to be almost ridiculous). Maybe two seasons if they were especially unlucky.
I wouldn't lose a lot of sleep over this one. It'll be one more opportunity to watch an Academy Award level performance of hand wringing. I wouldn't miss it - you'll be able to tell you grandkids all about it.
Sorry if I'm so jaded - just been there & done that.
I hate Halo. Every time I go in to delete some damned porn spam, I get back and I can't leave a comment.
I have to keep posting these "I hate Halo" comments so that I can post the one I tried to post unsuccessfully that Halo will now no longer accept because it thinks the comment is a duplicate. Whatever.
Dotcommunist, let me quickly clarify my general take on the foreclosure/predation thing.
Hmm.. "Puff piece" Next time I'll have to remember to include the "Esq." after my sig. Well, sorry I tried to change a world view. However Kevin's larger point is valid, people are probably still too pissed off about particulars of this financial debacle for the pragmatism necessary to start cleaning up the mess (before we ALL get dinged by it) to set in. (I'll try to avoid the strict construction vs. living document constitutional theological argument for the moment if you don't mind.)
I should have also placed "god given" of constitutional and god given right to contract in quotes, it was meant as dark sarcasm, which as I'm once again learning should only be used by experts. I'm personally not a bible thumper and am really just a recovering Mid-Western Lutheran (think Lake Woebegon). Unfortunately this means that, unlike Tanta, all I really have to rebel against from my religious upbringing are potluck dinners and tuna noodle casserole with those danged crunchy canned onion rings on top.
Andrew, you are undoubtedly a better lawyer than I, but I've eaten as much lime jello salad at the Friday Fish Fry as anyone, so let's not talk about recovering from our theo-culinary heritage.
Or else dryfly will start writing hotdish haiku again.
CR | Tanta (or Others)
I just saw this post on a different site:
What happens to their previous quarters if you strip out their subprime gains? Oops. Thats a question they sure dont want to answer. And how much accumulated interest income have they recorded but not actually received?
NYCityBoy
The Housing Bubble Blog » Bits Bucket And Craigslist Finds For May 3, 2007
I bolded (is that a word?) the part that I thought was interesting. I haven't read much on this nuance (the way that companies have been able to record non-existent (phantom) interest income) and how it might effect their bottom line. Has anyone read anything that attempts to quantify this value?
As I understand it when a person pays less than the interest on an option arm the company can record the whole interest payment as income. So I would be looking for lenders who have lots of negam option arms right?
Does anyone know if plain old negam loans also allow for this accounting anomaly?
btw, Tanta you got a shout out on that website, I bet if I asked you a year ago if you ever thought you'd be a mortgage superstar you would have thought I was nuts-o!
.......
Something to watch, from what I have heard today, there has been some tightening of credit at the retail level concerning the purchase of furniture, this could be significant, retailers turning to alternate lenders to pick up the lower scores.
The alternate lenders do not offer the same terms, ie no payments or interest until ???
On another note, the GM cc is a must listen, especially the question answer period and tadross in rare form over the accounts payable issue.
Somewhat OT:
Last year 800K homes were built in Spain about 1/2 the number in the US which has 7X Spain's population. I'm sure Spain is growing faster than we are, but not that much faster. Now that's a real estate bubble.
Theological stuff aside, one basic change in regulations that could prove fruitful is for borrowers of any loan with a scheduled neg-am payment to be provided with one, three and five-year amortizations showing the expected balance if they use that option.
I can tell you right now that this would cause a lot of "No, thank you's" when the borrowers look at those numbers.
Alot of it is second houses for wealthy Germans, Brits etc. From what I've read they are vacation homes so they will not be dropped on the market in 16 months... They maybe empty but wont apply downward pressure on the prices...
Or else dryfly will start writing hotdish haiku again.
Man we are getting dangerously close to a Midwest quorum here... CR & his Cali cartel better watch out. Would it be boring then or what.
Online euker anyone? I feel a powerful urge to spit.
People seem to forget the entire world around Americans is a social contract whereby there are damn few people living in cardboard boxes and begging on the streets. The same social contract gave you schools, hospitals, social security, roads, disaster relief and even television, among many other things. Try saying that you've never received a handout or a hand up. Are you taking care of your sick, retired parents in a room in your house on your own income? Are you grawing your own food? Are you clearing a path across the prarie or woods evey day so that you can shoot a bear for dinner. Spare the fauz outrage. Even if a 100 billion was proposed for morgage relief (which it is not), what does that compare to the hundreds of billions being WASTED right now by this gvernment in Iraq. Leaving aside the reasons for the war the word WASTE applies to the money spilled without result. The first, and lowest form of human behavior is to say sanctimoniuosly, thank God, I'm not like them.
Let's see earnings are up, ISM-manufacturing is up, ISM-services is up, productivity is up, factory orders are up, media stocks are up, the overall stock market is breaking records, household net worth is up, financial assets of individuals and corporations have increased vastly more than their liabilities, and jobless claims are way down. These are just a few snippets of continued economic prosperity.
There is no bubble. There is no recession. And with core inflation a mere 2.1 percent over the past twelve months, the stability and continued profits reins supreme.
We are in the middle of a synchronized global economic expansion the likes of which the world has never seen.
The Dow is enjoying its best winning streak since 1955. It has risen in 21 of the last 24 sessions.
Although a subculture of the economic food chain will be choose to be left behind, the question is:
Have things ever been better in all of human history?
Theo-culinary heritage, hotdish haiku and euker.. Yikes! Okay Tanta and dryfly, you made your point.
If its all right with you I'll just scamper back to lurker status here. Battles of wits with an unarmed person (me) can get ugly. The constitutionality and contract stuff just got to me and I had to vent a little.
Should you sue your lender?
Should you sue your lender? - MSN Real Estate
THE BEARS REMAIN UNCHANGED:
Anger, hatred, foaming at the mouth, bitterness, envy, victimology, unaccountability, non-responsibility, unpatriotic anti-Americanism, whinniness, pissiness, moaning and self-loathing and all with a dash of mental instability and lunacy--not to mention moonbattery!
Some things never change.
Betting against the massive, muscular USS Economy will get you what you've - your trembling, exposed asses blown off.
Ameriquest ex-employee speaks - Affidavit.
"It was common practice for employees to forge or alter loan documents"
"We were taught to close loans without regard for the customer's ability to repay"
We were taught to encourage people to add to their loans for luxuries to increase the amount of the loan"
"We were taught to tell people we would save them money although we did not"
http://www.housingchoice.org/news%20stories/2007/Bomchill%20Declaration.pdf
"all I really have to rebel against from my religious upbringing are potluck dinners and tuna noodle casserole with those danged crunchy canned onion rings on top."
Ooohh, after I quit distrusting people over thirty (I became one so what could I do) I did a second childhood number and fell in love with that stuff. But then, I was raised in So Cali by Midwestern parents ...jeez, I feel so dirty (sob).
OnT: Brokers et al -- and this goes for stocks as well as mortgages -- either need to be called what they have, for the most part, been until now -- that is, sales-people -- and forbidden by law to refer to themselves otherwise or they need to be reconstrued as fiduciaries with whatever regulatory overhang that entails and licensed accordingly.
Anything else is false advertising whatever one thinks of the other problems. JMO
I see the usual list of one-note-pony housing-centric lunatics have gathered here at the Alternate Reality Saloon to communicate with one another about the housing led recession and the tapped out consumer. A nice safe environment where they are not ridiculed by men, shunned by women, and mistrusted by children.
Has anybody seen my RECESSON? Huh, have you? I know it was here in 2001 or thereabouts. At least someone said it was, although almost NOBODY noticed it.
As long as youre looking, keep your eyes peeled for my 600,000 lost residential construction jobs too, cant seem to find any trace of those either.
Unemployment...no jobs...recession...soup kitchens...where are the jobs? ...my income isn't growing...poverty...depression... Buddy, can you spare a dime?...The Grapes of Wrath...Tobacco Road...outsourcing...globalization...its not fair...Bangladesh...redistribute...where's my BMW?...where's mine...you owe me....I'm not accountable...you are responsible...it takes a village!
I love the smell of retreating fear merchants.
We enter the new quater with considerable economic MOJO. The "one-trick-pony" alarmists are no longer relevant, and will need to find their own parallel universe in which to communicate with one another about the tapped out consumer and the housing led recession.
Ah, yes. I can smell the roses--and DJIA 15000.
The BODACIOUS profitfest debauchery rolls along.
KAAACHING!!
I am farting through silk, baby, farting through silk!
Send in the trolls...where are the trolls.. don't bother...they're here
oops - send in the troll, I mean. (dude, if you want to pretend to be more than 1 person you have to fire the spitballs off more sporadically.)
ATTENTION SCARED OF YOUR OWN SHADOWS BOND HOLDING PERMABEARS:
Data mining and WART DOCTORING for any bad news that fits your narrow, housingcentric world view is evidence of only one thing that the USUAL LUNATICS who constitute a certain sector of the financial food chain are not and will not be participating in the ongoing BODACIOUS profitfest debauchery.
Homebuilder Panitz closes its doors - The Daily Record - Jacksonville, Florida
One of Jacksonvilles oldest and best-known homebuilders is calling it quits due to what its owner says is a prolonged downturn in the local real estate market.
Panitz Signature Homes made the decision last month to leave the homebuilding business rather than weather the current cycle. The company will sell 11 homes, 25 home sites and 32 townhome sites during a May 19 auction. J.P. King Auction Company will manage the sale.
And with core inflation a mere 2.1 percent over the past twelve months, the stability and continued profits reins supreme.
Yeah, and with gas hitting $3.30/gallon now there's just absolutely no inflation in sight.
We are in the middle of a synchronized global economic expansion the likes of which the world has never seen.
Have things ever been better in all of human history?
Haven't seen it this good since 1928 or 1999.
Well it seems Capitalist Pig has gotten rid of his gas problem - at least temporarily.
I am stunned, stunned!, not to find a single reference to the very strong economic state of the union here
Check out The Wall Street Journal article, entitled Class of 07 Gets Plenty of Job Offers. It talked about employers planning to hire 17 percent more graduates this year than they did last year. This happens to top the college-hiring peak of the last economic boom in 2000.
The fact is, jobs continue to boom. So do real incomes, productivity, and profits. Economist Michael Darda points out that real wages over the first five years of the Bush expansion are actually growing more rapidly than over the first five years of the Papa Bush/Bill Clinton boom.
Meanwhile, unemployment today is only 4.2 percent. Federal, state, and local tax collections are soaring through the roof. Budget deficits are plunging. Inflation-adjusted GDP is averaging just more than 3 percent. Family wealth stands at a record of slightly more than $54 trillion. Total employment is at a record 146 million.
Stock markets, as you might have noticed, also continue to rise. CA-CHING! They have done so, almost without interruption, for four years, on the shoulders of a remarkable surge in business profits -- which itself is a function of the high-tech, knowledge-based product explosion.
These corporate profits, along with our record-setting stock markets, have enriched the more than 100 million investors who are participating in this prosperity. In fact, this America boom is spearheading a global economic surge. While the American free-market model is often derided as cowboy capitalism, imitation remains the sincerest form of flattery. And it isnt just China, India, and Russia who are acquiescing to the worldwide spread of American capitalism. Its also Eastern Europe and parts of South America. Heck, even the socialists in Old Europe -- like France and Germany -- are getting into the act by reducing individual and corporate tax rates to promote growth.
Note to scared bears and other modern-day class warriors: The best anti-poverty plan is a growing economy, one that creates jobs and higher middle-class living standards. As free enterprise has been unleashed around the world, government planning once again has been rejected. This is the spirit of Adam Smiths Wealth of Nations, where he argued almost 250 years ago for free markets, free trade, and a very light touch with respect to taxes and regulations.
Scared bears should understand the point that if the economy aint broke, theres no need to fix it. Taxing the rich will not make the non-rich rich. Attacking businesses will not produce more jobs and investor-class profits. Imposing trade barriers will not help high-quality, low-cost consumer imports, nor will it promote job-enhancing business exports or help poor nations grow richer.
But the bottom line is the bottom line: As we progress through 2007, the economic state of the union is excellent.
If it aint broke, don
The Dow is enjoying its best winning streak since 1955.
Say whatever happened to the Dow after that... say from '55 to '82? In real inflation adjusted terms... you or any of your sock puppets know?
Check out The Wall Street Journal article, entitled Class of 07 Gets Plenty of Job Offers. It talked about employers planning to hire 17 percent more graduates this year than they did last year. This happens to top the college-hiring peak of the last economic boom in 2000.
Yup 2000 was pretty hot, what happened after that... I forget.
ATTENTION SCARED OF YOUR OWN SHADOWS BONDHOLDING BEARS:
The fact that you must data mine and wart doctor for imperfections that support your long failed macro doom scenarios is a very encouraging forward indicator for the US economy, which ex housing continues on its free market, globalized profitfest rampage.
Heres the word of the day at the Jellystone National Park elementary school: CONTEXT.
The meticulously reasoned and uber-graphed permabear doom scenarios which constitute 100% of this blogs content crumble when considered within the CONTEXT of the larger economic environment in which they exist: Full employment, low rates, massive liquidity, low taxation, rising wages, increasing globalization, bodacious corporate profits, low p/e and high return domestic and international equity markets, etc., etc., etc., etc.
Put your housing graphs and meticulously tortured hand-wringing in the proper CONTEXT, and you will perhaps finally experience that tender moment of understanding why youve been 100% wrong lo these many years, and will continue to be wrong in 07 and beyond.
The Goldilocks economy continues to be the greatest story never told, and we are truly blessed to live in the greatest country on planet earth which continues to provide us with incredible opportunities.
God Bless America.
The demise of the U.S. has been predicted on and off for most of my life. As a kid there was the Cuban missile crisis and personal bomb shelters. In the 70's stagflation was going to sink us. In the 80's everyone predicted we'd turned into a banana republic by Japan in just a couple years. Just before it's breakup in the early 90's a good many people (including the CIA) thought the USSR might actually be winning the cold war. Now the doomsayers say Islamo-fascism is on the rise and we have no answer. And Iraq has destroyed our credibility and sapped our will. And China is on the rise and will soon overtake us.
The doomfreaks always have and always will speak with the certainty of the righteous that one and only one outcome is possible.
And betting against the US will continue to be a sucker bet.
Im sorry America isnt working for you, I hear the weather is nice in Havana this time of year.
ITS BEGINNING TO DAWN ON ME WHY SCARED BEARS CAN'T GET IT RIGHT.
BEARS tend to spend all of their time analyzing historical or coincidental data that has long ago been discounted by a forward looking stock market. Its already in the price. The market always looks forward but BEARS continues to navigate the investment highway while looking out the rear view mirror. They are totally preoccupied with yesterday's newspaper. This is a profound fundamental analytical flaw that deploys a methodology that will never let the player get out in front of the curve.
BEARS play a backward looking game, while the market always plays a forward looking game. And right now, the market is focused on the 2H of '07 while BEARS are still flogging and analyzing old and irrelevant trucking, housing and retail data.
Its like looking for the answer to growing more, bigger and better corn or cattle without ever having stepped outside of your dark and cold cave.
The BEAR persona is best described as the "ARTICULATE INCOMPETENT."
Get back under your bridges!
http://usinfo.state.gov/media/Archive/2005/Jan/24-107572.html
Poor old SCARED BEARS are hiding in their caves lest they get disemboweled from the bulls who are fully in charge of the financial markets. The usual lunatic-fringe, stuck-on-stupid cave dwellers here cant seem to grasp that housing is only 6% of the economy, and even the most SCARED of BEARY predictions would result in housing impacting GDP by 1%. RUN. HIDE. BUT - dont forget to cover your SHORTS while youre at it. COVER COVER COVER.
LOVE this astute prediction from BEARY DOOMHOLZ DJIA 6,800:
Cult of the Bear III: Getting to Dow 6800 | Innovation Update | Financial Articles & Investing News | TheStreet.com
NEXT BEAR SCRIPT: We are in UNCHARTED TERRITORY and NOBODY could have known how the housing market would play out.
Contrast that to the VERY RECENT PAST (or even presently) where Bubbleheads screamed with the CERTAINTY OF THE RIGHTEOUS that this time is NO DIFFERENT from the past and the nuclear winter outcome was CAST IN STONE. No other outcome is possible. This is a sure sign of a single cell organism incapable of understanding housing and autos in the CONTEXT of the larger economy.
100 million Americans are FEASTING on porridge which is JUST RIGHT while bears tremble in their caves gnawing on Billys frozen burritos.
THIN GRUEL. PLEASE SIR, MAY I HAVE ANOTHER?
BEARY DOOMHOLZis one of my favorite PERMABEARS along with Billy here. BEARY missed his 06 djia prediction by a mere 5,000 clicks!
NOW, ONLY 52-WEEKS LATER, HE IS FORECASTING DJIA 13220, UP 76%? HELLO?
PERFORMANCE NUMBERS? BEARY doesnt need no stinkin PERFORMANCE NUMBERS.
He doesnt keep score by the accuracy of his predictions. He is constantly out trolling for like-minded lunatics who see the world in the very same way that he sees the world. Its easier to find those folks and then convert them into fee-paying clients than it is to find the truth or accuracy.
Its the oldest game in town. These guys keep score on the basis of how much money they have under management or subscriber count and the fees that this generates...being right or wrong is only a SIDE-SHOW at best.
Funny how BEARY goes nuts when an economic number occasionally mirrors his bearish views... for that instant, they are always legit ... but when the number goes the other way, as they usually do, they are manipulated and part of a huge conspiracy.
BLAME THE INACCURATE DATA GENERATED BY MISLEADING REPORTERS WHO CONSIPIRE TO KEEP FOLKS STUPID.
Hmmm...
Troll. Why do you care if we talk amoung aourselves and share data?
If we're not participating in the run up, so what. Its always cyclic.
Personally, I've never predicted the demise of the US. But this will be the third real estate cycle of my life. It goes up and down quite a bit in California. For some reason the nation will join us this time.
Can HaloScan be foreced to have the letter matching... stop this spam.
As to be holed in my cave... Naaa. My investments have done fine.
I blogged about the increasing intensity of anti-bear anon posts.
Hopefully these comments can be corrected soon.
Got popcorn?
Neil
Good God please can't somebody run and get CalcimatedWrist so that all those terrible posts can be deleted.
I can't stand to even look at them.
I've heard of jingoism before, but financial jingoism?.. Sheesh.
Neil - enjoy them while you can, this sh*t is funnier than Colbert by a freaking country mile. If I was one of their writers I'd be cutting and pasting & making it a nightly biz focus.
Damn the guy is good.
PERMABEARS REDUCED TO POOR-MOUTHING THE DATA:
There is a orchestrated conspiracy out there to lie to and deceive the public. The Permabears "sources" tell them that the daily tsunami of bullish data is being manufactured in an illegal Tennessee buorbon distillary behind the Big Red Barn that houses unnatural farm animals. You know the Red Barn, the one where the black helicopters take off and the space ships land.
WHY IS THE BEAR'S HOUSING DOWNTURN "SPREADING"?
BEARS ARE NOT TURNING BULLISH...THEY ARE TURNING BULLS@#T:
1-Accuse the data collectors and data providers as being incompetent and conspiring to mislead and keep everyone misinformed. The world is burried under an avalanche of bad information.
2-Nitpick, twist and cherrypick the intentionally bad and misleading data until it supports your failed case that has been wrong for years. Correct the bad information.
3-Never admit that you have been wrong or made some mistakes, its the "irrational" market that's been wrong. You are smarter than the market.
4-Explain everything away and blame everyone and everything else
for your mistakes.
5-Keep everyone off balance and in the dark, that way you can flip/flop whenever its convenient for you to do so. When in doubt, talk louder.
Such BEARS exhibit certain psychological traits and behavioral patterns that do not inspire confidence and trust. They are in the wrong business, their skills are more suited to growing mushrooms.
We are not talking economics here, we are talking MENTAL INSTABILITY!
SCARED PERMABEARS WILL NEVER FLIP...
They will hibernate until the next spring and then emerge, dust-off their old B.S. ; put a little lipstick, rouge and a tight red-leather skirt on it and then recycle their stale old B.S. arguments again and again just like they have been doing for decades. Others will just be reduced to stuck-on-stupid, glooming and dooming Wart Doctors, who contribute nothing but cherry-picking and pointing at anything that supports their failed case and accusing all the other data as being the product of some kind of conspiracy.
The "tapped out consumer," their favorite black & white re-run, will get revived more times than Nick Nolte during a hellacious weekend.
"Damn the guy is good."
and FARTIN' THRU SILK, BABY!
Those posts are like psychological BATTERY!
Can't we SUE HIM?
Please dear God CalcimatedCyst delete all of those HIDEOUS POSTS!
Why is it a surprising that the economy continues to do well? There has been way too much drinking of the kool-aid around this blog vis-a-vis the housing market and the overweening desire to find data that will fit the hypothesis that the housing sector is poised to pull-down the overall economy. Macro and micro-economic data-mining for any little validation to thinly support the years-old lament that the current state of the economy is anything less than a boom evidently never gets old with some.
For a reality check look through the bear masks and see a fairly strong economic foundation: growing real wages, crazy-strong corporate profits, an export boosting weak dollar.
If one fixates on the troubles in housing, it is not too hard to find statistics that promise 45% declines, etc. What is missing in most of the discussion is that RFI is roughly 5%-6% of the economy, and the biggest problems are in a very narrow segment of the market - subprime lending, which is roughly 7% of the housing market. Hence, we are looking at 7% of 5% of the economy: 0.35%. If housing impacts 15% of the economy because of sympathetic spending, that roughs out to a 1% GDP decline. That is IF the doomsday bear scenario plays out as meticulously scripted which it has not.
One thing is certain: If you have been anything but long and strong you've been wrong (investing wise). From a trader's perspective, fighting the tape is always a losing battle. The trend remains up, momentum is positive, seasonal strength is upon us, and the bears and shorts have been vanquished.
This is unacceptable and akin to battery like young Timmy said.
I feel dirty, violated even.
Can't somebody notify the proper authorities?
Patrick...
I don't know if your being serious... but if you are, you need to see a mental health professional. If you're just taking the piss, good one!
Interesting ...The last time I saw troll bombing runs like this was in 2000; the worst was from the dot com bums who were about to be fired (and knew it) and the sales people who were just beginning to suspect they were next to go to slaughter.
That implies this current run of trash-talk must be from a mortgage bum who knows the game is over.
But either way no sense in providing feed to troll or a man-cow walking into the charnel house: One will simply continue to shriek and make threats until it is drowned and the other will only bellow until it is shot, trussed and gutted. Why waste time in chit chat with such?
Hey, look at Doomie's posts. They're only a minute apart. He spends days composing them in MS Word then Copy/Pastes them here en masse.
Cripes Doomie, I agree that the economy is doing great. So, why not get yourself a job? Make some friends??
perhaps it was computer generated... like that spam that doesnt make sense... unreal....
perhaps it was computer generated... like that spam that doesn't make sense... unreal....
If it is a spam program, I want a copy.
Seriously, I went over to Colbert's site to see if I could find an email address to their writers - they would hardly have to change a thing. SC would deliver that like money... er make that gold.
The only thing that would be even better would be to have Ritholz on as a guest the same night. Priceless.
No luck though - if somebody knows anyone there... CALL THEM.
Neil - enjoy them while you can, this sh*t is funnier than Colbert by a freaking country mile. If I was one of their writers I'd be cutting and pasting & making it a nightly biz focus.
Damn the guy is good.
I'm reading... learning...
It is good. But its just throwing at us all the ammo we'll see for the next year.
But as this is SoCal... I'm starting to hear about people I know being released...
Interesting ...The last time I saw troll bombing runs like this was in 2000; the worst was from the dot com bums who were about to be fired (and knew it) and the sales people who were just beginning to suspect they were next to go to slaughter.
I remember this. I went from being very bullish on dotcoms to bearsh in 1999. By early 2000 any mention of bearishness was a trigger for Trolling. It got worse and worse as the year progressed and the Nasdaq delcined. I had coworkers get very frustrated as I talked about their dotbomb stocks being overvalued.
Me? I splurged with my NASDAQ profits on the car I'm still driving.
Sigh... soon time to get a new one.
I did blog this not too long ago.
Since these guys probably won't have their DSL cut off for 60 to 90 days, we'll see a lot of it through 2007. Cest la vie.
Bummer I'll miss a lot of it in May (honeymoon).
Got popcorn?
Neil
I examined my pants... cotton. And I'm no farting, I mean not now... Am I a permabear?
Geez, I guess this is the second face of Sebastien - it's kind of like the second head of Voldemort in Harry Potter.
"We are not talking economics here, we are talking MENTAL INSTABILITY!
Funny Circus Bears"
I agrreen we are talking mental instabilty but, since we're descending into stupidity-it takes one to know one, it bounces off of me and sticks to you, etc, etc, etc.
Geeze, I wonder if we can live up to the standard of reasoned discourse set for us.
I am long term bullish, but I have to admit that it is tested a bit by this eyerolling stuff. I kind of prefer my bulls sober.
Go to DRUDGE and vote for Ron Paul.
Go to DRUDGE and vote for Ron Paul.
Done, now if we can just get to do it in the election.
"HOLY MOTHER OF BLOGGERS BATMAN...I THINK ITS A SCHIZOPHRENIC TROLL!"
"HURRY ROBIN, GO TO THE BAT MOBILE AND GET OUT MY SUPER DUPER HEAVY STRENGTH ANTI PSYCHOTICS!"
The troll, so tragic
Can't find buyers for his home
Anger fills his breath
Spring cleaning sadness
All has been wasted this month
Autumn leaves will build
Shed a tear for him
Between rock and hard place trapped
Takes it out on us
The 'flation cometh
Profanity comes in threes
Behold the horror
Sell the car I say
Use it to pay your mortgage
Potty mouth? Got horse?
The appraisers: Price estimates made to order
Scenes from a bubble: The appraisers - May. 2, 2007
MONEY has obtained more than 100 e-mails and faxes sent by loan officers to appraisers across the country. The language varies from asking if a predetermined value was possible to promising more business if a number could be hit.
"Many homeowners are finding out that the equity they were led to believe they had in their house is not actually there," says John Taylor, president of the National Community Reinvestment Coalitio
The troll posts are a perfect example of what is wrong with our society in general.
A whole heck of a lot of misplaced energy and productivity!
If that boob spent just half his misdirected energy on something productive ... he could cure cancer ... or something
) jeeezzz
Anyway ... I really like Tanta's 1,2,3 plan
'1. People who are struggling but could make the loan work with a reasonable modification should get one...
2. People who cannot carry their loans or sell their homes need to get foreclosed ...
3. If the borrower was a victim of predation, you make the lender cancel the loan... '
Sort of like everyone has to stick their finger in the light socket ... so it won't happen again (as easily). ONE caveat though ... the people that fall under (#1) get a BIG DING on their credit score.
What's Cramer say ... BUY,BUY,BUY !
"Financially strapped subprime mortgage lender New Century Financial Corp., failed to receive any bids for its mortgage loan origination business, forcing it to shut down the unit and lay off around 2,000 employees, the company told employees Thursday."
No bids for New Century
What happens on Main St when Wall St moves the party elsewhere!
my god the dollar is screwed!
I, personally, I am glad to have our great country defended in these comments.
Though Thomas Jefferson failed to include "farting through silk" in the Declaration of Independence (probably because Sally Hemings was sitting on his [rhymes with race]), I would say that it is included in the penumbra of the Declaration.
Go Bulls! Defend the country.
It is interesting, to me at least, that one of the Bull commenters included a rosy future for the American consumer in his calculations.
When it comes to the American consumer (who has no savings, whatever else he may have), it's all about psychology.
May the best psychologist win.
The market is up 22 of the last 25 days.
Does any one know that it is true what they say ? that the last time it occured was 1929 ?
Well, well, well. Mr. Flood had quite the party last night after I went to bed.
Would it surpise anyone to know that Tremulous Old Billy, OilyAnalDischarge, Funny Circus Bears, Beary Fan, MisCalculated Risk, Beary Shitholz Fan, Circus Bears, Bears With Salsa In Their Thon, Financial Midgets In Denial, Odd Lotters In Denial, Capitalist Pig, and Doomsters In Denial were all using the same laptop last night?
It must have been a great party. One friendless, witless little loser, sitting around with nothing to do on a Thursday night, pretendin' to be an entire frat house unto himself on the internet. And he so like totally pwned us!
Dear Sock Jock o' many names: you try pulling this crap again some evening when I happen to be still up, and I'll go in and keep changing your handle back to Sock Jock on all your worthless posts. There's a great big internet out there; you don't have to spend all your sociopathic energies here.
Hovnanian sees loss bigger than previously thought
Expired
Hovnanian Enterprises Inc. said on Friday its second-quarter loss would be bigger than it had previously expected, as the subprime mortgage crisis exacerbated weakness in the moribund home-building sector
Kmart same-store sales were down 4.7 percent for the first 12 weeks of the 13-week first quarter, primarily due to lower transaction volumes in a majority of stores.
Sears U.S. same-store sales declined by 2.4 percent, primarily reflecting a reduction in home appliances sales.
The company said it believes the decrease reflects a slower U.S. housing market and increased competition, and is partially offset by an improvement in children's apparel sales.
Same-store sales, or sales at stores open at least a year, are a key measure of retailer performance because they measure growth at existing stores rather than from newly opened ones.
Shocking news Tanta! But I should be ashamed of: unfettered laughter at the handle "bears with salsa in their thon" (misspelled creativity too much for me) and wondering if David Lereah has too much time on his hands between jobs...
bless you for police work - i am mostly outraged with you..haahaahaha..salsa...
According to BLS, in March REAL earnings were down 4 cents. That's just one of our laptop avenger's misunderstandings.
Yal, KMart's gain on children's clothing is probably attributable to Easter being a week earlier this year.
Next up:
Government program to provide assistance to mortgage companies who have suffered losses by being unable to legally forclose on non-performimg mortgages due to emergency no-foreclosure moratoriums.
Next next up: assistance for investors in Mortgage-backed securities who suffered losses due to losses in the underlying portfolio due to mortgage companies being unable to... whatever.
Re: jobs report
Looks like ADP was vindicated this month: they estimated 64,000 and the BLS estimated 63,000 for private-sector jobs.