Lumber and Recessions

Is there public data available for past (and current) lumber prices somewhere?

Hmm, I found lumber prices from 2004 to the end of 2006, it's available in www.nahb.org. More recent data, anyone?

MF Global Futures: Futures Brokers, Futures Trading, Commodity Trading, Online Trading

The May 2007 lumber future prices. Man, it just drops off a cliff there, doesn't it?

On the other hand, copper, the metal with a PhD in Econ, is still quite high. However, it is tied more to the world economy at this point than just the U.s. economy. The international strength may be the thing that saves the day for the U.S. economy. If the rest of the world is stronger than the U.S. it should lead to weakness in the dollar which should over time improve out net export position. So far earnings expectations for 2007 and 2008 have not collapsed. A little bit of softness for 07, but estimates are still, on balance going up for 2008.

Check out lumber prices in 2000.

Lumber (LB, CME): Monthly Price Chart

Ouch.

Copper has been the sweetheart of a lot of speculation, (also thanks to the commodities guy last week). Copper concrete and steel still get used by industrial, commercial and public works (China) when housing (wood) becomes less interesting.

I believe we are already in a recession but the indicators we use are not adjusted properly to measure the current economy.

To paraphrase Bill Gates, we're using industrial age indicators to measure a digital age economy. (he was talking about education)

Sorry for the dupe link, Mark beat me to it.

Bureau of Transportation Stats: Transportation Index - Freight Component has been in nose dive since July. Mr. Market hasn't cared since the DJ-TRAN recovery (Rails were probing at all time highs until Feb 27th).

lumber been on a steady downward march all of 2006. Mills have closed, and related industries have been suffering for months.

And US lumber is a nice protected industry via tarrifs

If you could chart the price of land, you would see the true commodity that impacts the price of homes - its dropped like a rock. Lumber is an also ran in CA.

"Pending loan applications are being redirected to other lenders, she said. The company's 6,700 employees -- down from 7,200 at the end of December -- are still reporting to work regularly, she said."

And......

they would be reporting to work regularly to do "what" exactly?

New Century Faces Cutoffs by California, Fannie Mae (Update4) - Bloomberg.com

Well, there's another way the housing bubble wasn't sustainable: it wasn't environmentally sustainable. We need a recession to give the trees a fighting chance.

"they would be reporting to work regularly to do "what" exactly?"

Visit blogs (to find out the lastest on their company) and visit Monster.com.

I'm looking at a copper chart from Prechter's Conquer the Crash book.

In 1929, copper appeared to peak at the same instant that the stock market did. As the market crashed, so did copper.

Further, here's copper's chart.

Copper High Grade (HG, Comex): Monthly Price Chart

For what it is worth...

  1. Copper turned down in mid 2000 and took about 4 years to recover.
  2. Copper turned down in early 2006 and has yet to recover.

One more thought.

The weekly view of the CRB is looking rather sick. Not that I'm complaining!

Gallery View - StockCharts.com

The bulls would say that this should help relieve inflationary pressures, which is true.

The bears would say that this should help relieve inflationary pressures, which is also true! Wink

I plotted the lumber monthly composite prices from Random Lengths from 1995/01 to 2007/02, but didn't find anything conclusive. Prices appear to have been down in 2002 and 2003 also.

Plot here

We need a recession to give the trees a fighting chance.

I fear that even a recession might not save the trees. There has been talk of converting them to paper and dropping them from helicopters!

I'm long-term inflationary and short-term deflationary. I'd like to think I'm a perfect mix of tame overall inflation expectations. Smile

Lumber
Salesmen friend of mine was telling me starting around Nov 06 he noticed yards had been laying people off and now that it's the start of housing is back in Calif. no one has been hired back. I travel I-5 in northern Calif. and the only trucks are pickups owned Const. companies and not the hundreds independents I would see on the way to Elk Grove and Sac. Calif.
There's starting to be see-through commercial along the freeway something you didn't see in 05/06.
Ask your insurance agent how home owners insurance sale are.
jo6pac

Oh by the way Diane Swonk the genius economist says housing and sub-prime small impact on the economy. This woman has a pathetic record of calling the economy over the years. why she is interviewed is just amazing.

Great blog along with others provide unbiased factual info.

Vacation home prices in Spain, a leading indicator of Europe's property market, may face a slump that's worse than the real estate decline in the U.S., based on the loan terms banks are imposing on developers.
Vacation Homes Boom in Spain May Bust as Banks Recoil (Update1) - Bloomberg.com

So much for la dolcé vita.

4shzl, I'm seeing almost daily promotions for young British and Northern Irish FTBs to get on the "property ladder" by speculating in offshore real estate to obtain their down payments. Today it was Bulgaria. What are these people thinking?

aapo,

I plotted the lumber monthly composite prices from Random Lengths from 1995/01 to 2007/02, but didn't find anything conclusive. Prices appear to have been down in 2002 and 2003 also.

For what it is worth, the stock market was still falling in 2002. It didn't make me want to rush out and buy furniture. I believe 2004 is when I finally broke down and bought a dining room table. I'd owned the house since 1997 and figured tables probably weren't going to get any cheaper. It was the same time I was buying gold and silver. Go figure.

Sold the gold and silver a bit too early in 2006 perhaps, on the way up the parabola (parabolas generally scare me). Those bears around me convinced that this was the big one turned me into a contrarian's contrarian it seems. No idea even to this day if it was the right thing to do. Can't complain though.

I fear that even a recession might not save the trees. There has been talk of converting them to paper and dropping them from helicopters!

LOL!!! Good one.

On copper, zinc, aluminum... there are two factors in play (1) weakening dollar and (2) real global shortages.

People all talk about 'Peak Oil' but in many respects there is even more of a global shortage of some of these 'base metals'... especially zinc.

Then couple that to the falling dollar and we could see prices in USD stay strong even while the economy slows.

Plot copper vs the euro and it probably doesn't look as 'bad'.

I don't know what to make of the $CRB. JOC-industrial price index has been on a steady upswing
Sorry -- We Can't Find That Page | Journal of Commerce

Being a bear stinks by the way.

Which should I be?
1. A deflationary bear?
2. An inflationary bear?
3. A fence riding stagflationary bear?

I tend to find myself in the latter, based on helicopter speeches and what not.

I miss the days of being a bull. Just buy something and "hope" it goes up.

A picture says more than a thousand words. The graphs you posted really bring the trend line into perspective. Thanks.

Mark M.,

For what it is worth, the stock market was still falling in 2002.

Good point.

Looking the chart a second time, I noticed that before and during the 2001 recession lumber dropped over $200 (it's $ per thousand board feet btw). And, it appears we are currently going through a second $200 drop.

Scary.

Which should I be?

How about a 'survivor'?

I went to high school & college in 'stagflation' graduated college into the early 80s recession... lived through oil patch bust & ag crisis... then Bush I bust then dot.bomb.

If there is any one thing I learned is that being a fundamentalist bear or bull will kill you. Roll with the punches and learn to duck & counter punch.

dryfly,

How's this for contrarian?

I grow more and more comfortable with the idea that China is trying to re-enact our Great Depression.

  1. They are clearly going to be the next superpower.
  2. Everyone KNOWS this.
  3. Therefore, the path is clearly straight up.
  4. They build skyscrapers better than we did in the 1920s.
  5. Skyscrapers take a lot of materials to create.
  6. Meanwhile, they crank out products for us, like we once did for Great Britain.
  7. At the rate they are going, they too shall someday have the reserve currency of the world. The operative term being "someday".

Copper had a LOT to do with scaring me out of gold and silver.

I sold the last of my "hoard" on a Friday. That weekend Warren Buffett tells the world he thinks there is a commodity and housing bubble. Good grief! What happened to all his silver? D'oh! Needless to say, I slept well that weekend and had a lot to think about.

Our motto...

The United States of America, making it harder and harder to preserve wealth since 1999.

If there is any one thing I learned is that being a fundamentalist bear or bull will kill you.

Here are a few arguments that made me cringe, and I paraphrase for comedic effect (hopefully).

Nothing has fundamentally changed when it comes to holding commodities.

You mean other than the 17 rate hikes inflicting pain and stress on borrowers?

Since it took 15% interest rates to tame inflation in the 1970s, I shall hold hard assets until I see 15% interest rates again, lock them in and live on easy street.

From where I sit, at even 8% interest rates I'd be buying easy street for pennies on the dollar.

I don't understand why gold and silver moved with the market when it crashed 400+ points.

Could it be that in our highly overleveraged world people were actually leveraging safe havens? That's just crazy talk!

Mark M. I am with you on a great depression for China. They are so overbuilt in manufacturing that they are already feeling a deflation. Probably the reason the government is trying to reign in more investment.

There's another possibility on the margin. Canadian Lumber tariffs were reduced April '06.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/United_States-Canada_softwood_lumber_dispute

Just sayi

Mark M, You are correct - it stinks to be bearish. It's largely a closet existence. Always best to be quiet since the subject is hardly a cocktail party conversation starter, unless you enjoy getting blank stares or frowns.

I think we're going to see a period of asset deflation followed by a nice round of inflation in staples/energy concurrent with wage stagflation. Basically a grinding recession. Now that's a fun conversation to spark up with a stranger... or a spouse, or your child... The glass is 3/4 empty and it has a hole in it.

The glass is 3/4 empty and it has a hole in it. - barely

That reminds me of one of my favorite quotes.

I guess I just prefer to see the dark side of things. The glass is always half-empty. And cracked. And I just cut my lip on it. And chipped a tooth. - Janeane Garofalo

it stinks to be bearish. It's largely a closet existence. Always best to be quiet since the subject is hardly a cocktail party conversation starter, unless you enjoy getting blank stares or frowns.

You guys get invited to cocktail parties?

OK, I changed my mind. The mortgage thing is gonna work out! Home prices are on their way up! Buy stocks!

So, where's the cocktail party?

Mark - here is another thing I've learned though don't get to practice it much (since I'm not rich).

The real rich don't hoard commodities and especially not gold (too inconvenient & not productive enough). They PRODUCE the commodities.

In fairness to gold bugs the rich also don't hold 'fiat' as 'fiat' per se. They own WEALTH instead... land, whole companies (so they can control for their sole benefit), intellectual property, mines, etc.

If the assets are truly PRODUCTIVE their value will rise with the demise of whatever fiat they are denominated in.

But that's not their real value...

In the meantime they continue producing goods & services that they can turn into fiat to support themselves. They aren't just sitting around waiting for appreciation.

That has always been the weakness of the 'gold fever' crowd... that is unless you actually own a gold mine - all of it, not just 'shares'.

And as part of this strategy they only need to convert the minimum amount of wealth into fiat to consummate immediate transactions then covert the remainder or net gain back into wealth (buy more land companies, etc.) ASAP. Thereby minimizing exposure to inflation & loss.

I mean if you own a 100,000 acres of prime farm land across three continents... say kicking out 6MM bushels of soybeans per year at $7/bu... do you care how many dollars its worth if it was paid for a generation ago? Think 'cash cow' as big as a western state national park.

Or if you own the drilling rights to huge tracts of GOM? Especially if bought on a sweetheart deal years ago for cheap?

No way we can even begin to approach what they can do. Its a fools game to even try. We are and will be wage slaves even if our net worth is a million or more.

What was it Marx said... "You either own the factors of production or you ARE the factors of production."

So, where's the cocktail party?

Not at my house - we had hotdish tonight... from cans of cream of mushroom soup no less.

Tanta,
Now that Dryfly brought up Marx, that reminds me. You could get some cocktail party one-liners about building booms gone bust from the film The Cocoanuts.

The Cocoanuts (1929) - Memorable quotes

haven't been here for a while. Nothing changed I see except the retired executive now collects tips. Oh well -- hope the tip jar is overflowing. I wonder if any house flippers or RE agents give you any tips?

I still don't see a recession coming this year. Early to mid next year perhaps. So not my view -- So no tip for this post Smile

A lurker here...

I just had a meeting with a client who runs a high-end cabinetry wood-shop. He told me that in the 22 years he's been in the business he has never experienced a slowdown like has occurred in the last few months. The phone just stopped ringing. Obviously the guy is very worried.

This is in Madison, WI

.

This is in Madison, WI

They ought to worry. Same with craftsman serving Oconomowoc, Mequon, or up in Door County. They had better have some nuts set aside for winter or they won't make it.

Same goes for my neck of the woods Twin Cities... I'd guess Stillwater, 'Tonka & Crocus Hill will be just as ugly.

it isn't just going to hit Cali & NYC. It quite likely will be worse out here in 'fly over'. We don't have as much real money... plenty of wannabes though.

It will get interesting before its done.

dryfly,

I might disagree with some of what you say.

I think Richard Russell sums up my mindset best.

RULE 3: RICH MAN, POOR MAN: In the investment world the wealthy investor has one major advantage over the little guy, the stock market amateur and the neophyte trader. The advantage that the wealthy investor enjoys is that HE DOESN'T NEED THE MARKETS. I can't begin to tell you what a difference that makes, both in one's mental attitude and in the way one actually handles one's money.

The wealthy investor doesn't need the markets, because he already has all the income he needs. He has money coming in via bonds, T-bills, money market funds, stocks and real estate. In other words, the wealthy investor never feels pressured to "make money" in the market.

The wealthy investor tends to be an expert on values. When bonds are cheap and bond yields are irresistibly high, he buys bonds. When stocks are on the bargain table and stock yields are attractive, he buys stocks. When real estate is a great value, he buys real estate. When great art or fine jewelry or gold is on the "give away" table, he buys art or diamonds or gold. In other words, the wealthy investor puts his money where the great values are.

And if no outstanding values are available, the wealthy investors waits. He can afford to wait. He has money coming in daily, weekly, monthly. The wealthy investor knows what he is looking for, and he doesn't mind waiting months or even years for his next investment (they call that patience).

But what about the little guy? This fellow always feels pressured to "make money." And in return he's always pressuring the market to "do something" for him. But sadly, the market isn't interested. When the little guy isn't buying stocks offering 1% or 2% yields, he's off to Las Vegas or Atlantic City trying to beat the house at roulette. Or he's spending 20 bucks a week on lottery tickets, or he's "investing" in some crackpot scheme that his neighbor told him about (in strictest confidence, of course).

For what it is worth, I was a little guy who invested in a gaming company and it retired me in 1999 at the age of 35. I chose to invest rather than buy a new car. It paid off. I no longer feel the need to make money. I'm all about wealth preservation these days. When real interest rates turned negative in a big way, I bought physical gold and silver. When interest rates were back to reasonable I sold it. I'm now patiently "waiting" on the sidelines in TIPS, T-Bills, and I-Bonds. As I spend beneath my means, the status quo is fine by me. However, I don't think any of us will be so lucky. I'm bracing for impact. However, I would love to be proven wrong. It is easier to maintain wealth in a bull market than a bear one.

I'm all about wealth preservation these days.

That's the difference between affluent & the truly wealthy - folks like Buffet are always on the hunt for income producing assets - that is all real wealth is... the ability to produce income.

They might not need additional income but are always looking for ways to grow the net worth & waiting for appreciation of a 'dead asset' might be one way to do it but its really, really slow.

Buffet mostly buys undervalued companies with solid revenue streams and even better potential... then reinvests back into the company (again reducing the 'fiat' risk by converting the cash into non-fiat income producing assets). And he almost always tries to buy whole companies or controlling shares - so as to funnel the lions share of benefit his way.

In short it is all about 'rent capture'... if you got a lock on a huge sector of rent capture you have wealth preservation regardless of what happens to the fiat.

BTW - I don't think we disagree much... you think the landowners who control say 100,000 acres of Brazilian soybean land worry much about income today? I don't, they got plenty. But that doesn't stop them from buying even more land.

The Bible gives me hope for the future.

In the OT days, the invading empires took the elites into exile, say exiled top 15% or so. Then brought in new group of impoverished former elites from somewhere to replace them and start over.....

dryfly,

BUFFETT'S SILVER LINING
A February 3, 1998, Berkshire Hathaway press release, announced: "In recent years, widely-published reports have shown that bullion inventories have fallen very materially, because of excess of user demand over mine production and reclamation. Therefore, last summer, Mr. Buffett and Mr. (Charles) Munger, vice chairman of Berkshire, concluded that equilibrium between supply and demand was only likely to be established by a somewhat higher price." Mr. Buffett is chairman of Berkshire Hathaway. The company owns 129,710,000 ounces of silver, purchased from July 25, 1997 to January 12, 1998.

Buffett on the prowl for over $30bn of deals
On commodities, Mr Buffett said he detected speculative participation in the recent run-up in prices, particularly metals. He added that Berkshire had not benefited from the sharp rise in silver prices, in spite of at one time owning a lot of the metal.

"I bought it very early, I sold it very early. Other than that, it was perfect," he joked.

"OK, I changed my mind. The mortgage thing is gonna work out! Home prices are on their way up! Buy stocks!"

Sounds like a NAR convention. I don't think I would last at that party either.

Perhaps I need to look for bear parties... or just lean hard on the juice at superficial feelgood cocktail parties and, so as long as I don't have to drive myself home, I won't care what the conversation is about.

Mark, Buffet plays in commodities & currencies some for sure... But he made most all his money in things like insurance companies & manufacturing... He found 'gold' in unlikely places like 'Fruit of the Loom'.

I actually work with some companies B-H own. After they came in they dramatically improved operations... and then held them for a long time. The cash these operations generate goes back into buying others. That's how you go from being a guy peddling your own mutual fund door to door in Omaha to being one of the richest guys in the world... not by sitting on a pile of metal.

You generate enough wealth that way you can afford to lose or make a little money playing in commodities or currencies.

Think about it - has gold made anything?

Hey fence-riding stagflationary bear ... "now patiently 'waiting' on the sidelines in TIPS, T-Bills, and I-Bonds": what are you considering investing in when the wait is over?

Here are some more selected quotes from Warren Buffett.

"If you told me I had to go away for 20 years, I would rather take an index fund over long-term bonds. You'll get a chance to do something extremely intelligent with your money in the next few years. But right now there doesn't seem to be a clear enough direction to conclude anything dramatic." - 2005

We're coming up on that "next few years" era I think and I'm fairly confident he didn't intend for us to buy real estate at the top.

In 2002, junk bonds became very cheap, and we purchased about $8 billion of these. The pendulum swung quickly though, and this sector now looks decidedly unattractive to us. Yesterday's weeds are today being priced as flowers. - 2004

The flowers are wilting, lol.

When we can't find anything exciting in which to invest, our 'default' position is US Treasuries, both bills and repos. No matter how low the yields on these instruments go, we never 'reach' for a little more income by dropping our credit standards or by extending maturities. Charlie and I detest taking even small risks unless we feel we are being adequately compensated for doing so. About as far as we will go down that path is to occasionally eat cottage cheese a day after the expiration date on the carton. - 2004

Frugal.

TIPS [Treasury Inflation Protected Securities] are not a bad investment for people worried about inflation heating up, which we're seeing signs of. - 2004

Just when you think it might be cooling off, it pops back up again.

If your children are grown (or you have none), your debt is small or zero, and your wants are modest, then mere upper-middle class affluence can free you from the markets. I semi-retired early and shifted to wealth-preservation mode last fall. About half of my friends have done likewise, but none of us is really wealthy.

Not to say that I won't get back into the markets when the time is right, but accepting the risk-free rate of return and sleeping well is just fine for now.

Buffet is really sharp - I agree. I went away and did some laundry washed dishes and thought to myself... "Okay smart ass, what if Mark asks YOU what you'd invest in other than pretty safe mutuals, treasuries & such... then what?" I don't have a better answer than Buffet that's for sure. No shock then that I'm a whole lot poorer too.

So maybe I shouldn't feel so dumb if he can't find value... Except that sucker still tends to find them!

But it isn't JUST that he buys stuff cheap... you can always buy shit cheap ... he finds a bunch of income producing companies (scratch & dent on the cheap) then gets his team to patch them up & lets them go about the business of producing income... Takes some of that new income & buys more just like it.

The key is they just doesn't sit idle - most of those enterprises grow even in tough times (I mean the guy is in Omaha remember - I do Nebraska & western Iowa, will be there next week... we aren't talking Wall Street).

What a guy.

Great discussion Mark M, dryfly and others. Now I reveal my ignorance. Mark M, you pointed out the sick looking CRB index...I agree it looks sick. But why are the CRB spot indices at all time highs? Look at the CRB raw industrials and metals spot prices...up, up, up with no end in sight (well could change tomorrow, but...). Just been trying to understand this.

So no dollar bears among the life -- I mean wealth -- preservers?

what are you considering investing in when the wait is over

If I wanted to make real money, I'd start or buy a small company & run it.

One of my friends just bought a small manufacturing company near Chicago for about what the land cost (everyone knows mfg is pretty depressed - the cost to buy some of them is evident in the asset prices)... Its like he got the machinery & business for free.

If worse comes to worse he can always use his contacts & broker Asian producers until the dollar realigns.

I currently own a small biz but its really just a way to funnel my contract work fees into salary & benefits... I'm not acquiring any real assets in the firm... a mistake in hindsight.

But of the people I know who have made real money - almost all have done it that way. By 'real money' I mean greater than say $10 million net worth having started with nothing. Many have done LOTS better.

If this 'impending' recession is half as bad as we all claim... there will be opportunity all over the place as we near bottom. Find a burned out niche & re-colonize it.

dryfly, re: That's the difference between affluent & the truly wealthy - folks like Buffet are always on the hunt for income producing assets - that is all real wealth is... the ability to produce income.

i think you may be confusing statistical outliers with common sense. while the billionaires out there probably all maintained very high equity allocations (and probably little diversification compared to the market), that does not mean their strategy is a wise one to copy. for a self-made investor to become a billionaire, first he has to make a million, then ten million, then a hundred million. well before he gets to a billion, he has all the money he needs to live a comfortable life. most people at the ten million level will recognize it is prudent to pull back on the throttle and preserve wealth, because increasing their wealth by three more orders of magnitude will not add as much pleasure as reducing it by three orders of magnitude would.

if everybody with ten million decided to "go for it" to become a billionaire, maybe several hundred would lose much or all of their money for every one who "makes it". it is one thing to gamble long odds with four or five figures, where the loss can be replaced out of future income. but at a certain point (which is different for everybody), prudence takes over.

i make this point because your statement suggests you may think the "truly wealthy" (let's just say obscenely wealth) have some special investment insight which causes them to always seek out income generators. i don't believe this is true. they just have a higher tolerance for risk, and their group is self-selecting. we just don't see the other 99% of billionaire wannabes on the front page of Barron's, just as we don't see all the actor-wannabe LA waiters and waitresses on the cover of People.

note here i am talking about investors, who have a great deal more flexibility than entrepreneurs. most billionaires are entrepreneurs. very few got there the way Buffett did.

Think about it - has gold made anything? - dryfly

"It gets dug out of the ground in Africa, or someplace. Then we melt it down, dig another hole, bury it again and pay people to stand around guarding it. It has no utility. Anyone watching from Mars would be scratching their head." - Warren Buffett, 1998

You buy gold, like I did, under the expectation that someone else will buy it from you. In that sense, it is actually sort of undesirable, lol. I believe in market psychology though. When interest rates were 1% and inflation was higher than that, I was fairly confident (okay, a bit scared perhaps) someone would buy it from me. Other than that, I completely agree with you. Perhaps I'd read too many hyperinflation stories about how people late to the hoarding party ended up with bedpans too (no joke!). I would have chosen just silver, but silver is hard to transport. Further, I'd need something for the border guard if Bush was to somehow get elected for a 3rd term! Wink

Hey fence-riding stagflationary bear ... "now patiently 'waiting' on the sidelines in TIPS, T-Bills, and I-Bonds": what are you considering investing in when the wait is over? - Sally

I kind of like the idea of the WisdomTree's earnings and dividend weighted mutual funds. They have low fees and are less likely to buy the "obvious" home run hitters like Google. What I don't like is seeing so many payday loan centers everywhere I go. I don't like how the radio is flooded with mortgage ads. I also don't like that the funds are currently overweight banks (since they have high earnings and dividends). I don't have a good feeling about financials. I remember buying Citigroup (Citicorp back then) when it had a P/E of 6. My broker tried to talk me out of it. The next month the cover of a major magazine had "Why Banks Are Sexy" on it. Good grief, that was a fun ride! Now it is implied that banks can't lose money and that the government has made us nearly recession proof even as the subprime loans fall apart. Call me skeptical. I could be wrong though!

I'm hoping it won't be real estate. I'm too lazy to be a landlord. That's like a real job. I certainly won't be a flipper. That's even more work than a landlord and seems to imply a TV crew will follow you around. Wink

Part of me hopes I can permanently wait. The market just sort of muddles higher for the next 50+ years and I die penniless (living off assets like a good patriotic American). It wouldn't be the worst thing to happen, if I time it right, lol.

So, where's the cocktail party? - Tanta

All this talk of cocktail parties must be a sign! Maybe I can invest in a cocktail party business! Anyone think people will wish to drown their sorrows soon? Of course, I'd probably have to take credit instead of cash, wouldn't I? I could serve subprime beverages to offset the risk, but don't tell anyone else that!

If I wanted to make real money, I'd start or buy a small company & run it. - dryfly

In theory, wouldn't it be cheapest and safest to do it at the bottom of the next recession? Assuming we get one that is?

darffot - I think the obscenely rich have a better ability to identify and more importantly CAPTURE rents... once you own the rents the money follows pretty quickly.

Think Bill Gates, IBM & DOS.

But the same thing happens if you own lotsa soybean land in South America (and I mean A LOT of land). Part of that rent capture comes from political connections as well as land ownership.

My point was that the super rich do TWO things... (1) they make sure the assets they own continue to produce and don't just sit idle and (2) the assets by way of their income tend to not be tied to a single currency (again think farm land producing a globally consumed and traded product - can sell it in any currency then convert that into whatever you want).

If you make it to say $10 mil and you sit on it, try to just then run out the clock... either you live at your previously austere levels or your grand kids likely have to make the money all over again.

One thing you will note about the obscenely rich is that most of them came from the ranks of the obscenely rich before them... that is because they never stop hunting for income (or their hired minions never stop hunting for them). The wealth pyramids generation after generation even as the 'family' grows.

Lastly - I don't think this is a strategy that will work for most of us. Most of us are doomed to be wage slaves forever.

But I also don't think 'wealth preservation' works all that well either unless we are pretty close to death (clock is indeed running out).

I've seen too many folks make good money, save a little, get very cautious and then see it all be eaten away again by a recession or bad luck. Its happened to my family though we were never multi-millionaires.

The only way you 'preserve wealth' is to be sure your assets have reasonable chance to 'produce income'... any instrument that produces future income (measured as actual goods & services produced or resulting currency from production of goods & services) IS wealth. Its the only real wealth there is... all else is a temporary illusion.

That was my point.

Tanta,

Forget the cocktail. Nowadays they have chocolate-tasting events which should suit you better. In addition, we should invite all the mtg industry to a kool-aid tasting conference... why bother with quality beverages?

If we look at a list of the 25 richest people in America, we find that only three of them "invested" their way to wealth - the others either started enormously successful businesses, or inherited from people who started enormously successful businesses.

Bush's `Ownership Society' Flounders as U.S. Economy Weakens
Bush's `Ownership Society' Founders as U.S. Economy Weakens - Bloomberg.com

President George W. Bush spent years promoting an ``ownership society,'' the idea that Americans should own everything from homes to the assets needed to pay for their own health care and retirement. Now the weakening U.S. economy is exposing the dark side of that dream.

So no dollar bears among the life -- I mean wealth -- preservers? - Sally

I probably should be more dollar bearish than I am. I'm sort of expecting a 1970s replay to some extent. The dollar was having problems heading into that era as well. It is hard though, with so many deflationary forces at play.

What if in the short-term the Fed protects the dollar? We have an unproven Fed right now. Bernanke might be more hawkish on inflation than he should be. I'm kind of surprised that they even got rates up to 5.25%.

In the long-term, TIPS are somewhat protecting me from a falling dollar. Well, assuming it doesn't get too far out of hand anyway. 15% interest rates and inflation scare the heck out of me. My TIPS would earn 17%, in theory, but the tax bite would be horrendous.

I can't even begin to imagine the carnage the stock and housing markets would face. Sometimes it is simply best to lose the least if pain sets in and simply come in like a janitor to see what tidbits are left behind. Perhaps. Maybe.

During a severe hyperinflation I'd still be in awful shape. I don't even want to think about earning 100% on my TIPS. It sounds all fine and dandy until you factor in taxes. That brings you down to an 80% return in a 100% inflation rate world. OUCH!

This is why people would hoard silver and gold. You could at least defer the taxes on 2 simple metals that in theory would keep up with inflation. Gold and silver would do better than that though. It would be like a game of musical chairs with not nearly enough chairs!

Stocks would inflate too, but kiss productivity goodbye. Restaurants would spend way too much time changing menu prices, maybe even while you are eating, lol.

But what do I know! We're in uncharted territory.

Mark M,

Here is a link to Mr. Practical.

Carried Out-Minyanville

If you value his views use the search function to find him. I think Tanta adds great value to these discussions and is a Ms. Practical in my mind which is meant to be highly complimentary. His waiting in Yen while giving up the cost of money is similar to your reasons (and mine) for buying gold/silver at multi decade lows. Because metal pays no dividends Warren likely tired of holding it as he is accustomed to revenue streams to his liking in short order. Gold/silver is speculative because of this lack of revenue stream, yet at times it can be a most wonderful wealth preservation tool. It has certainly been that the past 5 years. I think it will continue along those lines until paper begins to offer compensation for the risk of holding wealth in terms of paper. Metal may come under very serious pressures near term but if they cut rates/keep printing or panic from deflationary pressures I think it will preserve wealth much better than any fiat, as it seems the world is having a competitive currency devaluation. It has been a very long time for the psychology of gold to take root in peoples minds.

Foreclosures will not make people homeless
Blogger: Page not found

Why a subprime bailout is full of BS

Only one post on this thread mentioned the lottery, which is the only tried-and-true, fully democratic, equal-opportunity, motherhood-and-apple-pie, all-American way to wealth. I'm pretty sure you guys must be communists.

But why are the CRB spot indices at all time highs? - Glenn_in_MA

In my opinion, we've borrowed it. When the dotcom bubble imploded, the Fed pushed interest rates down to 1% in an attempt to reinflate our economy.

There have been 2 trends since that time.

  1. Assets have gone up (stocks, real estate, oil, precious metals, commodities). Unfortunately, the "wrong" ones went up the most. Can't have the "inflationary" ones rise that much or the government gets involved.
  2. Interest rates have gone up.

In a rational world, those 2 trends are not compatible long-term. The second trend has temporarily stopped. Who really knows how the first trend is doing.

Of course, there is another compelling trend.

China. They've been growing at an obscene pace even before the dotcom bubble. To me, they are like a store which continues to expand regardless of how their customers are doing. Can't afford to buy today? We'll take your IOUs! Happy times!! Just keep buying!! Would I want to invest in a company that did that? So what makes me want to invest in a country that does that? I think they are almost as scary as we are. Japan's story was once VERY compelling too. I drive a Camry. So what happened to them? The answer: a deflationary mess.

How bullish is the following chart in the long-term? I've seen silver permabulls claim silver will return to its all time high once people recognize its value. I find that VERY hard to believe.

Live Silver Prices, Silver Bullion Prices & 650 Years of Silver Prices

That's probably what commodities should do in the long run, assuming we aren't actually running out. I for one could believe in Peak Oil. I just can't say when. It might be long after I am dead, maybe. I have a much harder time in believing in Peak Everything, especially if it coincides with ultra low interest rates. Peak Housing? No, I think the builders would build as many as they can. Are sales prices still higher than the costs to make houses? It is very odd to see them slow their building. Why can't they just ask for IOUs like China does?

How much copper goes into each new house? I believe the answer is still, "A lot!" (hundreds of pounds) What about Peak Trees? Nope. We've got plenty of those still it seems.

Hey, just opinions and random theories. I could so be wrong on all of this, but that's what makes for a fun debate. I'd love for someone to convince me I'm wrong. If I am wrong, please convince me in time to change my investments. In a sense, I've been at least partially wrong since 2004, or right for the wrong reasons anyway. I became too inflationist perhaps. Maybe I'm still too inflationist. TIPS had a hard time last fall. Once everyone becomes inflationist, watch out below? Then, once everybody turns deflationist, that's when the real inflationary party might start? (falling dollar(s) from helicopters, more wars, more deficit spending)

Or not. The government decides. Perhaps it really isn't up to us.

"Gold/silver is speculative because of this lack of revenue stream, yet at times it can be a most wonderful wealth preservation tool"

And if one substituted 'real estate' for 'gold/silver'? (MEW's might fix that pesky lack-of-revenue-stream thing for awhile, though not without the preservation of value/wealth part teetering a little ...).

Mark M:
I wish that I had enough confidence in the big brokers to jump in the Wisdom Tree, because it does look like a good idea (esp. the dividend-based products). But it seems to me that the meta-bet you make is that the house itself will remain solvent and/or responsible, and I don't know how to evaluate the house's exposure to funked-up and unwinding-at-any-time leverage.

cccatii,

I can certainly appreciate the appeal of the Yen right now. In some ways, it reminds me of 2004. Back then everyone was rushing to the Euro. I just couldn't do it. Gold and silver were not yet headline "material", pun intended. Few are rushing to the Yen these days. What's stopping me from buying foreign currencies is that I know so little. I'd prefer to go with a "known evil" workaround. At least I understand TIPS.

As for gold and silver at current prices...

I believe the global economy has bought too much stuff and used too much leverage allowed by interest rates that were too low, our country in particular. Therefore, I came to realize I was at risk buying even more stuff (gold and silver) as a hedge against it. I'm not suggesting it is necessarily a bad risk. It is simply a risk I hadn't thought of. It is almost always what you don't know that gets you in trouble.

It was very tempting to buy something, anything, when interest rates were just 1%. Gold and silver are somethings. Perhaps it is good that everybody didn't do what I did (sold stocks to buy precious metals)!

As for the competitive devaluation arguments, what if our interest rate hikes are actually intended to pop China's bubble? I wouldn't put it past our government to engage in economic warfare if they felt it would help the long-term situation. I'm not what you would call a conspiracy theorist, but I don't really think our current administration feels China is our friend. The Cold War was almost entirely economic.

Here's one extra little tidbit of trivia about China. I've heard arguments that nothing bad can happen in China before their Olympics in 2008. They just wouldn't allow it.

Any guesses on where the Olympics were held in 1932?

BOTH the Summer and Winter Olympics were held right here in the USA that year. Yeah, nothing bad can happen. As taken from the Olympics website...

The third Winter Olympics, in 1932, were held in Lake Placid, New York State, a town of fewer than 4,000 people. Faced with major obstacles raising money in the midst of a depression, the president of the organizing committee, Dr. Godfrey Dewey, donated land owned by his family to be used for construction of a bobsleigh run.

That probably won't happen though. It would lead to all sorts of It Was Not Different This Time T-Shirts, yet another business opportunity during the bust.

Sally,

But it seems to me that the meta-bet you make is that the house itself will remain solvent and/or responsible, and I don't know how to evaluate the house

Sally,

But it seems to me that the meta-bet you make is that the house itself will remain solvent and/or responsible, and I don't know how to evaluate the house's exposure to funked-up and unwinding-at-any-time leverage.

I was going to say one thing in that last post, but instead I'd like to ask a question.

Is there any way I can make money shorting HaloScan? It reminds me of the US dollar. It is not stable! Wink

Only one post on this thread mentioned the lottery, which is the only tried-and-true, fully democratic, equal-opportunity, motherhood-and-apple-pie, all-American way to wealth. I'm pretty sure you guys must be communists. - albrt

Just any old lottery won't work. You have to participate in a Draft Lottery to be a real patriot.

It is so 1970s!!

You know, the Army might just help you build wealth.

23 rules for boosting wealth
13. In a growing area, real estate is usually a good investment. Buy a house to live in if you can. However, real estate can and does go down in price periodically. Do not use fancy financing to buy a house that you would not otherwise be able to afford.

16. There is always another bus. Stand on the street corner, and soon another one will come along. My dad passed on this bit of wisdom to me when I was a teenager. So don't be discouraged if you did not buy California real estate in the early 1990s. Another opportunity will come along.

18. If you are lucky enough to buy before a big run-up in prices, whether in real estate, tech stocks or whatever, remember that when the music stops, not everyone will make it to a chair. No one ever went broke taking a profit, but in doing so, you may miss a lot of the run-up in prices, as well as the subsequent collapse.

Wow. That's not something I expected to see in the Army Times. Maybe I should get a conscription. Oops, make that subscription!

BoE Takes Property Blame

The group that decides the interest rate deliberately fuelled a consumer boom to boost house prices and personal debt so that "UK Plc" could avoid recession.
Former governor Edward George said the Monetary Policy Committee "did not have much of a choice" in the matter.
The MPC members were battling to use interest rates to prevent the UK being dragged into a worldwide economic slump, he explained.
And, he said, his legacy to the MPC - which decides the rate - was to "sort out" the problems that policy had caused.
"We only had two alternative ways of sustaining demand and keeping the economy moving forward: One was public spending and the other was consumption.
"We knew that we were having to stimulate consumer spending; we knew we had pushed it up to levels which couldn't possibly be sustained into the medium and long term.

Bank Takes Blame Over Property | Business | Sky News

I suspect sooner that it is about a correction. Possibly, also a sideways-movement is to be expected. Of course, caution always is right. But there are many examples that the forecast of the future always is difficult.

The bankers who sign the checks, the appraisers who value the property, the retiree who speculates on the property, the investment bank that pools the mortgages and tranches them, the rating agency that rates those pools, the other investment bank that securitizes the tranches, the rating agency that rates those securitized pools, the other investment bank that sells insurance on the securitized tranches, the pension/hedge fund that buys the pools/tranches/securitizations. All have the means to keep the game going - to effectively go back in time to the halcyon days of 2004 or the even the salad days of 2005. But that's not what's happening.
And it's not going to happen either. Whomever it was that first came to his/her senses in this credit madness is moot; it's the fact that his/her action -- that mortgage banker, that CDO trader, whoever -- catalyzed the opposite trend toward probity. After an orgy of credit-based risk taking, incented in almost every conceivable fashion by monetary and social institutions, the negative feedback effects of reduced liquidity are almost certain now to run their course in the opposite direction with potentially equal (or greater) costs. Booms turn to busts not because something 'happened.' They turn to bust because there is simply no other path.
It is said that when men go mad they do so all at once. But they gain their sanity slowly and one by one.
That credit supply is being tightened means we've passed the 'one-by-one' stage and we're approaching 'all-at-once.'

Commentary: What goes boom must go bust Outside the Box - MarketWatch

Bush's "ownwerhip society"? More like "endebtedness society"? Do people own more or less today? Do they owe more or less? How about the federal government, states or locals? More BS that was bought into by millions.

I didn't have time to go through all the posts but check out Association of American Railroads  for railroad volume. It might be lumpy but "Lumber & Wood Products" volume is down 26.7% YoY throug the first 10 weeks of the year. The weekly data comes out every Thursday. The Intermodal figure is painting an interesting picture as well since its basically goods coming via containership into the US. 15 - 20% of all containers into the US (mainly from Europe) are made up of furniture/household goods. Something to watch even if Week 10 had a big uplift (chinese new year?).

Where are real estate tax receipts headed?

Is the hit going to big enough to cause municipal bonds to default?

Some municipalities will go, especially those with high retirement and health obligations (older cities); those with high infrastructure developement costs to catch up with recent growth (newer cities); and those who gave away much of their non-residential taxable base in exchange for "development" (almost every city). Take your pick!

Thanks lloyd for that suggestion that the domestic hardwood furniture industry is a tiny niche market in the same way that the NYC luxury apartments are a small and unrepresentative slice of the national real estate market.
Not that a downturn even in this hi-end (and commercial) fragment is not useful but it's connection to the residential market is not like the softwood lumber (didn't we (maybe just Menzie at Econobrowser) notice that in the q4 BEA release where we saw that surprising result under Industrial Supplies for Imports?).
Thank you for that link to railroad volume.

Given that the Secretary of the Treasury, his colleagues in the private sector, and the Japanese Finance Ministry will keep the yen low and the carry trade booming until hell freezes over, the only real place to look for change is at the Fed:

By Martin Crutsinger, AP Economics Writer
Federal Reserve Officials Expect to Keep Interest Rates Unchanged

WASHINGTON (AP) -- The federal funds rate, the interest that banks charge each other, has been at 5.25 percent since last June when the central bank capped a two-year, credit-tightening campaign with its 17th consecutive quarter-point rate hike.

In the five Fed meetings since that time, the central bank has stayed on hold.

"People who were getting optimistic about rate cuts were being ridiculous," said David Jones, chief economist at DMJ Advisors. "The Fed will start cutting rates only when they see the housing decline begin to drag overall economic growth below their Fed forecast."

Jones said he still expected there will be one or two rate cuts this year but not before late summer at the earliest.

"One or two rate cuts this year, but not before late summer..." that is what everything discussed here is all about: whether that statement holds up.

How you play that prediction is the premise beneath your entire economic game plan.

If we look at a list of the 25 richest people in America, we find that only three of them "invested" their way to wealth - the others either started enormously successful businesses, or inherited from people who started enormously successful businesses.

Execution & operational effectiveness. Its not the better mouse trap that makes millions, it making & selling an adequate mouse trap better that makes millions.

They didn't tell us that in engineering school... nor do they tell you that in b-school. That's one they only teach at good old 'Hardknocks U'.

Calmo, Not sure if my post was clear but the lumber stats and the intermodal (ie...containership boxes arriving into US ports then moved onto railroad cars) are seperate. I wasn't trying to make a connection between hi-end furniture, far from it. The 15 - 20% figure is for finished products such as basic furniture & household goods imported into the US that comes in via container ships and a slowdown is a clear sign that retailers are scaling back their purchases in the face of waning consumer demand. It could also be due to the slowing roll-out of super stores. WMT is the single biggest container importer into the US.

So my post was highlighting two things: 1) big YoY decline in Lumber that is probably dirven by lower construction. 2) muted container voume into the US could mean consumer end demand is slowing quickly. Point #2 fits in with the trucking data.

FMT selling loans for just 3.5% under face value?

Fremont Sale Clears Out $4 Billion of Subprime Loans (Update4) - Bloomberg.com

"Fremont Sells $4 Billion of Loans in Exit From Lending Business

By Bradley Keoun

March 21 (Bloomberg) -- Fremont General Corp., the California thrift ordered by federal regulators to halt subprime lending, agreed to sell $4 billion of mortgages at a discount, resulting in a $140 million pretax loss.

The loan sales will be completed over the next several weeks, Santa Monica-based Fremont said in a statement. The sales reflect a 3.5 percent discount to face value. Fremont said it received $950 million from the first installment of the sales. The buyer wasn't specified.

Fremont, which shut its mortgage-lending operations March 5 and put employees on paid leave, continues to operate its commercial real estate, residential loan-servicing businesses and retail banking units. The company hired Credit Suisse Group to find a buyer for the mortgage business."

Is that a good deal? Correct me if I'm wrong, but that seems expensive for the risk that remains.

If I wanted to make real money, I'd start or buy a small company & run it. - dryfly

In theory, wouldn't it be cheapest and safest to do it at the bottom of the next recession? Assuming we get one that is? -Mark

Because the learning curves & ramp ups take so long when starting a business... if you try to start one to time the bottom, you will likely miss the top.

A better strategy is to have a biz plan that allows you to successfully operate & learn throughout the whole business cycle, even the down beat (operate lean & austere) then explode into the market as the boom unfolds.

Especially since you don't exactly know when (or even IF) the next boom will come.

For example... I think the best time to start on a real estate career would be right about now as we head into the collapse. If you can learn to operate in this kind environment, you can make it anywhere, any time.

But if you start today - don't give up your day job just yet - you'll need that second income for quite a few years while things thin down & get skinny. But if you survive, make honest decent contacts, you'll be pretty well set when things normalize (not boom, not bust - just normal business... my guess is we'll never see another boom like this last one in our life yet lotsa folks will do well once it normalizes again).

On the other hand the WORST time to have entered RE was 2-3 years ago... all you would have 'learned' was how easy it was to make big money... because all you would know was how to operate in the biggest boom in history. Not the skill set they will need to survive a return to normalcy let alone this down turn.

I think the same applies to mfg - its probably a pretty good time to start a business, especially once floundering companies REALLY start liquidating equipment. Think 'bootstrap'.

Is that a good deal? Correct me if I'm wrong, but that seems expensive for the risk that remains.

Nikki - they haven't sold them yet just planning on selling them for that amount - its their opening offer, we'll have to see what the bids come back like (if they are even reported) to know if the market thought they were expensive or not.

Lloyd, sorry to give the wrong impression. CR, not you, cites the hardwood manufacturer as a supplier of residential furniture, but your post aligns with my perception of where most of our furniture comes from...and directs us to softwood lumber (along with others here) which strikes me as a much better example of what CR refers to as "Lumber".
So your post and your very last one too, clarifications I appreciate along with many others.

Mark M.

Good stuff. As you are probably well aware, there were more millionares made per capita after the depression than any other period thereafter. At least that is what I have read.

I believe that there is a lot of good money chasing bad money right now. In fact, it has been that way for quite some time.

I suspect Fleckenstein's correspondent is in fact talking about furniture. Not housing.

As this suggests a spillover into the retail sector, it is interesting in its own right.

Kash has a follow up post on banking:

The Street Light

A couple of notes on building your own business: First and foremost do something you know and like.

Good time for the factory thing? Yes, but you need to learn from the bottom up. Make sure you enjoy it. Ignorance and hatred make for poor business partners.

Age is important. 30s-40s good time to start from bottom. Later not so good.

Dedication. Expect 50-60 hour weeks at less than minimum wage while your workers do better.

Family Support. Gotta have it. A bitching spouse of whatever gender is a real downer.

Check with the local university business school. At mine, they partner with the Small Business Admin to give inexpensive ($10 session not too long ago) sessions on starting and maintaining a business. The SBA website is a gold mine of info.

Have a Plan! Without one you are sunk.

The majority of the very wealthy, from my observations, got that way one of two ways: 1) they inherited(e.g. the president); 2) they positioned themselves close to a major money stream and grabbed as much as they could as it went by (think hedge fund managers and Robert Toll). A third substantial fraction made their money by building up a business; these are the ones I feel contributed the most for their wealth. A smaller fraction was shrewd (sometimes lucky) investing, and last on the list were fortunate with stock options. I would be happy to see routes 3 and 4 move further up the list.

Oops, for number one I should have said "family money", not "they iherited" (death not required).

This morning, FedEx reported lower earnings and cited a slowing economy as part of the reason, plus lowered guidance for this year, citing slowing economy.

FedEx and the other shippers were used as a growth indicator in the internet shopping boom in the 90's. Does this mean that people have moved back to buying at local stores, or are they are buying less in general?

About LoanCity's demise -- here is a page of interesting documents -- they were being probed long before the housing bubble, but it looks as if they took on more debt than they were supposed to (check out the accusation doc filed in 06):

404 - File or directory not found.

Which makes me think of Kash's latest post about whether banks really have enough reserves to tough it out through all these foreclosures...wonder if LoanCity's demise is a foreshadowing of more problems in prime-lending banks...

small business is fun!

hi dryfly - nice to see you again.

i'll let you all know when my personal 'cash cow' has come home and i can set it sailing off to the horizon spitting out dividends every month...

if only it were that easy!

Late to the party here, but I use ENR's construction cost indices. They track prices for commodity construction items (Portland Cement, 2x4, ply, Structural Steel, Copper Tubing, etc.) monthly in 20 cities.

McGraw-Hill Construction | ENR

Historically, lumber prices (2x4 and ply) have been good predictive measures for residential construction, and cement and structural steel prices have been a leading indicator for commercial construction.

Why does copper keep going up? Most FMJ bullets use copper.

Login or register to post comments
Syndicate content