So what's the opinion: Bank run or no bank run?

Rajesh wrote:

Bank run or no bank run?

Kabul 5K

Bank runs are a bit meaningless when there is a conspicuous printing press in the back.

3:00 PM: Consumer Credit for July from the Federal Reserve. The consensus is for a $3.5 billion decline in consumer credit.

To be followed by the announcement of 2 historically large M&A deals.

Venezuela goes all in to prove once again that planned economies dont work.... Wonder how long it will be before Hugo Chavez is hanging upside down in a public square ala Mussolini...

Venezuela introduces Cuba-like food card - Venezuela - MiamiHerald.com

greenchutes wrote:

there is a conspicuous printing press

That's what make the Irish case so intriguing. They shipped their printing press off to Belgium. Now when they try to call up for more money they just get a busy signal.

Shadow, it was worse than that. No public square. It was a gas station.

ShadowInventory wrote:

Venezuela goes all in to prove once again that planned economies dont work.

I would say the problem with planned economies is that everything becomes a political football -- not just for public debate but for internal bureaucratic competition. Dollars depersonalize the conflict inherent in planning and keep the conspiracies and cliques spread among a multiplicity of power structures.

Hugo Chavez is proving that economies planned by corrupt, egomaniacal dictators don't work. I think calling it 'socialism' is just a way to legitimate it. I wouldn't hold it as an example of discrediting anything other than rule by crooked tyrant, because that's what it is; a strongman looting a nation.

Agreed. Trichet doesn't like dealing with dirty Irish extortionists - so uncivilized, not like his fellow enarques.

:Porkchopped:

burnside wrote:

Hope you had time to step in at 'in 't Goede Uur'.

I didn't.
I was trying to catch the train to Zandvoort.

Ever been to Rene's in Amsterdam?
Great coffee and tasty pastries.

Gnome, we went into Amsterdam for recitals or to the Concertgebouw. Museums also. I thought the coffee and pastries and confections were delicious pretty much everywhere. Don't recall Rene's, though.

Should say I didn't altogether avoid the Melkweg. Wink

Why are so many CR fans foodies?
We all eat yummy, and sometimes strange, foods.

Incidentally, loved that article on plastic pollution in the oceans that was linked towards the end of the last thread. The photos are really something... Makes me think we dont have it so bad in the USA at all - we are a lot cleaner than any of the 3rd world... I wonder who would let their kids go into that water - yuck... Anyway thanks to whoever posted that link...

burnside wrote:

Should say I didn't altogether avoid the Melkweg.

My buddy and I spent a bit of time trying to find the Dampkring one afternoon.
We stopped to check our map, looked up to find we were right in front of it.
Smile

ShadowInventory wrote:

I wonder who would let their kids go into that water - yuck...

When it is the only water available .....

That is what all central planners say.

Gnomester - we keep this up and you know the thread will become a travelogue. Tempting as it is.

Byzantine_Ruins wrote:

Hugo Chavez is proving that economies planned by corrupt, egomaniacal dictators don't work.

This time it's different Smile

burnside wrote:

Gnomester - we keep this up and you know the thread will become a travelogue.

Yeah, I gotta get a shower anyway.
My liver is needed at a Labor Day Gathering.
Beer

Later, all.

In the good old days of 1950's and 1960's US taxation was even more harsh than in Sweden today. The top marginal rate was whopping 90 percent.

I would guess those rates played a part in making the Reagan years possible. Not too hard to describe 90% as confiscatory.

LoserBeachBum wrote:

The top marginal rate was whopping 90 percent.

Of course, nobody really paid that rate.

--CONJURECAST--

Conjure says, "If you only read one thing today, read this."

Delusions Of Recovery - NYTimes.com

"Have a nice day."

mp wrote:

Delusions Of Recovery - NYTimes.com

His prescriptions are all wrong, but he's spot on with the diagnosis. Great stuff in that short piece.

TJ and The Bear wrote:

he's spot on with the diagnosis. Great stuff in that short piece.

Check out his link as well. It is first rate stuff.

Thanks for the Krugman link mp.

josap wrote:

We all eat yummy, and sometimes strange, foods

My daughter-in-law is from mainland China and tonight she is cooking "Coke" chicken -- chicken legs cooked in a sauce made from Coca-cola. Sounds horrid, but is actually delicious. My stomach is growling just thinking about it!

HomeGnome wrote:

Ever been to Rene's in Amsterdam?
Great coffee and tasty pastries.

Is that what they call it now? Thank you

mp wrote:

Check out his link as well. It is first rate stuff.

Charting the effects of stimulus doesn't interest me much. Might as well graph morphine shots on a stage IV cancer patient. The impact is entirely transient and leaves you weaker than when you started.

All these stats and interpretation of stats and opinions of stats make my brain feel zombieized:

http://s874.photobucket.com/albums/ab306/wj_emm/?action=view&current=zombiedog.jpg

TJ and The Bear wrote:

Charting the effects of stimulus doesn't interest me much.

It's important to Conjure. He'll be using data like that to make his call.

mp wrote:

He'll be using data like that to make his call.

Well, that certainly makes it interesting! Smile

TJ and The Bear wrote:

is prescriptions are all wrong, but he's spot on with the diagnosis. Great stuff in that short piece.

Yup. he forgets Delusion #3 - his own. That more stimulus fixes it.

For those who missed it and would like to know, I left a link to Conjure's graph of the latest ECRI weekly leading index.

It's on page 2 of the comments in the "Unemployment Rate and Level of Education" thread.

Why is everyone (PK included) so afraid of default??

It's there for a reason. To make prolonged BS like what's happening now end quickly.

skk wrote:

he forgets Delusion #3

I'm at Delusion #4: Hiding within a government institution puts me further behind in the unemployment lottery than my private sector counterparts. Puzzled

mp,

Any FX calls lately? Oh, and what was that comment I missed the other day about "the next few weeks"??

MiTurn wrote:

chicken legs cooked in a sauce made from Coca-cola

One of my favorites - take a pork shoulder and marinate in Pepsi for about 3 days, in a plastic bag in the bottom of the fridge... Then put the pork shoulder in a smoker for about 12 hours... You can baste the meat with some Pepsi that has been reduced by simmering too... makes a wonderful basting sauce... sweet and with citrus notes... Ah I am making me hungry!!

Interesting Times wrote:

Why is everyone (PK included) so afraid of default??

I'd think that it is the same reason that ex-Soviets were afraid of the S.U. collapsing. There is a lot of sweat and ideological equity in the current arrangement among the older/establishment.

TJ and The Bear wrote:

Oh, and what was that comment I missed the other day about "the next few weeks"??

I think you may be referring to a comment I made last night after I posted a graph of ECRI's weekly leading index.

The question, as I recall, was about the timing of the next downturn.

I said something to the effect that we'd know for sure within a few weeks.

And so will Mr. Market.

mp wrote:

And so will Mr. Market.

Mr. Market is on an extended sabbatical leave. Standing in for him is his deaf and blind cousin Mr. Speculative Fever.

mp wrote:

I said something to the effect that we'd know for sure within a few weeks.

Ah, okay... wanted to make sure I wasn't missing something important. Not that THAT isn't important, but I too feel that September & October will not be pretty.

Shiny metals should still be (comparatively) pretty, though. Wink

TJ and The Bear wrote:

Ah, okay... wanted to make sure I wasn't missing something important. Not that THAT isn't important, but I too feel that September & October will not be pretty.

idk,, we said that last summer, too. I do remember that.

Which is worse - bankers or terrorists wrote:

idk,, we said that last summer, too.

Many HCN folks (excluding gfi et al) weren't sure that QE 1 would do as much as it did. I know I was on the wrong end of that bet. Now if QE 2 leaves the docks, I'm thinking that any foreseeable Dooooooooooooooom!!! may be put off until next Spring at the earliest. The one "uh oh" factor that is playing out this year is the Nov. elections. Political hot potato for all the world to see.

yagij wrote:

Why is everyone so afraid of default??

Because those assclowns are the bondholders, that's why. It is the pensions that ultimately get killed.

yagij wrote:

Now if QE 2 leaves the docks,

I just have to believe it will be part of the fall political season. Post-labor day announcement 4 sho.

Interesting Times wrote:

Why is everyone (PK included) so afraid of default??

I think its because THEY'll lose money - or think they will. That's why I feel that journalists at places like NPR, slate.com, salon.com, theatlantic.com who one would normally expect to pick up the cudgels on behalf of the ripped-off have so singularly failed this time, leaving it to the likes of rollingstone ( I mean, c'mon, Rolling Stone?) and the various blogs, including this one to nail the issues.

A discussion with my 68 year old lawyer buddy, pretty much an unreformed lefty, still resonates with me - I said - "bond-holders should have taken the appropriate hit during the banking meltdown."

He says: "Don't pension funds hold these bonds?"

The light went on in my mind - **the bugger means HIS pension fund **- as I spluttered and twisted to answer that.. I couldn't help but see what a freakin' tangled web of cross-conflicted self-interests exist here.

Edit : bankersorterrorists got there wayyyy ahead of me. Wayyyy to go.

Byzantine_Ruins wrote:

Hugo Chavez is proving that economies planned by corrupt, egomaniacal dictators don't work. I think calling it 'socialism' is just a way to legitimate it. I wouldn't hold it as an example of discrediting anything other than rule by crooked tyrant, because that's what it is; a strongman looting a nation.

The expansion of the state into sector after sector in Venezuela is due to the failure of successive elements of the Venezuelan economy. It becomes about the provision of political goods to the plebes and the provision of looting opportunities (with a cut going upstairs) for the cronies. Case in point is the oilfield services industry which wouldn't work for no pay... so Hugo nationalized and brought in some Chinese help except they can't do the job, either. Production continues to decline due to technical incompetence in addition to insufficient reinvestment as cash is harvested for social spending...resulting in less cash to harvest, further reductions in reinvestment and so it goes.

Have a good evening.

skk wrote:

He says: "Don't pension funds hold these bonds?"
The light went on in my mind - **the bugger means HIS pension fund **- as I spluttered and twisted to answer that.. I couldn't help but see what a freakin' tangled web of cross-conflicted self-interests exist here.

Part of the problem is demographic in the US. Seniors as a big slice of the pie right now, they are smart enough to know that a bond crash will kill their pensions; so will inflation. This is why grinding deflation and kick the can down the road is the big description here.

I honestly don't understand why we don't have more of a generational war in this country than we do.

Which is worse - bankers or terrorists wrote:

idk,, we said that last summer, too. I do remember that.

Yeah, you're right. Both Sept and Oct had some good downdrafts but were basically hiccups in the bear market rally. That things really had some legs, didn't it?

skk, let's add the New Yorker's James Surowiecki to the company of footdraggers/spinmeisters.

I never though him stupid or uninformed. He's not. He's an interested party.

Which is worse - bankers or terrorists wrote:

I honestly don't understand why we don't have more of a generational war in this country than we do.

I do, but I see college-aged kids on a daily basis. None of them seem to be gearing up for war.

skk wrote:

The light went on in my mind - **the bugger means HIS pension fund **- as I spluttered and twisted to answer that.. I couldn't help but see what a freakin' tangled web of cross-conflicted self-interests exist here.

That's sad. Because it wasn't THEIR fault their pensions were mismanaged. Still, the pill must be taken.

yagij wrote:

I honestly don't understand why we don't have more of a generational war in this country than we do.
I do, but I see college-aged kids on a daily basis. None of them seem to be gearing up for war.

I was hanging out with some people in Egypt 15 years my junior this spring for a bit, and it was really nice to hear them viciously beat up Generation X (my generation) over what we've done. The way I see it, it was people all my age (the mid-30s mortgage brokers, appraisers, and developers) bending the rules. Hell, I was one of them.

I would be really pleased to see a nice '60s-style generation war upcoming. I think it would be good for the country. In the 60s....lots of the racism, sexism, and hierarchical crap was purged out of the country. This time, let's see the greed purged out. One may say that's impossible, but imagine what was thought to be impossible in the 1950s.

That's sad. Because it wasn't THEIR fault their pensions were mismanaged. Still, the pill must be taken.

I doubt our pension was mismanaged, Still, you first. Take your own pill.

To follow up on my college-aged student comment, I can easily relate to what this commenter wrote on ZH:

I have a good many non traditional aged students in class, maybe as many as a third. I have a retired nurse who is 71 years old, in her wheel chair. I have a couple others I don't know their ages, but they have handicap accommodations that I must make that are age related. I have cops looking for a pay raise and moms looking to better their situations. Ex-navy, unemployed, told me point blank she is sitting out her unemployment in class, she isn't even going to try to find work. Another ex-navy, disabled for life after an explosion (seems the boiler rooms blow up all the time and we don't hear about it). University looks really different than it did (okay, I'll say it, a little like a hospital room). Non traditional students have their own union and services, etc.
.
It is going to be hard to sort who is who in these stats. But I'll tell you what, right this second, enrollments are waaaay up. We have had increases in student population anywhere from 6-9% every semester for the past 2 years. It is the only thing saving our asses. I am teaching a mass class to accommodate demand, ran out of seats pretty early, could have taken more if we could have found a bigger room.
.
I see this wave going for a while. People are living off Pell grants, food stamps and student loans along with the unemployment in some cases. Not a bad strategy if you are in trouble and are decent with school. Just hope the debt does not paralyze them to the point that the job they get afterwards cannot pay back the debt. That is the trick. As long as the money flows, they will make this choice, if they can. Never before have we had so many applicants to our graduate program that already have 1,2, or even 3 masters degrees.
.
It's weird out here.

Welcome to Greece circa 1990-2000.

pavel.chichikov wrote:

Still, the pill must be taken.
I doubt our pension was mismanaged, Still, you first. Take your own pill.

Ah yes, life in a world with a contracting money supply. Ain't it great?

Just waiting around for another sucker to trip first and go broke. Pretty much sums up the state of the world these days, doesn't it?

pavel.chichikov wrote:

I doubt our pension was mismanaged, Still, you first. Take your own pill.

I have no pension. I am 100% self-employeed. My pill was taken when I was laid off back in 2002. I have never looked at the concept of "employment" and "loyalty" the same. My pill was bitter but cured me of my delusions quickly.

Interesting Times wrote:

That's sad. Because it wasn't THEIR fault their pensions were mismanaged. Still, the pill must be taken.

Did they concern themselves with where the corpus of the pension or retirement fund was placed? Or how much gearing was involved? Probably in passing. But these are educated people, relying on educated people.

his time, let's see the greed purged out. One may say that's impossible, but imagine what was thought to be impossible in the 1950s.

When the gods would curse someone, they grant what he wishes.

Or as St. Teresa of Calcutta put it: More bitter tears are shed over prayers answered than prayers denied.

Why do people imagine that some radical departure is going to save their bacon? You must not have lived through what actually happens.

I have no pension.

There, you see?

pavel.chichikov wrote:

When the gods would curse someone, they grant what he wishes.
Or as St. Teresa of Calcutta put it: More bitter tears are shed over prayers answered than prayers denied.
Why do people imagine that some radical departure is going to save their bacon? You must not have lived through what actually happens.

I've doubled my net worth (more than doubled) since September 1, 2008. This sequence of events has been awesome for me. I would like some more volatility, please.....

pavel.chichikov wrote:

There, you see?

This is where your perspective is wider than mine. I am trying to see, but am clouded by my own self interest. Smile

I am 100% self-employeed.

If there is a radical departure and you are self-employed as a gravedigger, you might make out OK.

Are you strong enough to take people down from meat hooks?

Believe me, no quick moves and steady as she goes is best.

I've doubled my net worth (more than doubled) since September 1, 2008. This sequence of events has been awesome for me. I would like some more volatility

How wonderful for you. We are all rejoicing for your sake. Snark

I am trying to see, but am clouded by my own self interest.

How unusual.

pavel.chichikov wrote:

Are you strong enough to take people down from meat hooks?

Holy crap. What imagery. I was just thinking those bond holders get a 30-50% hair cut. And perhaps housing would be properly priced... no meat hook required in my view.

pavel.chichikov wrote:

I've doubled my net worth (more than doubled) since September 1, 2008. This sequence of events has been awesome for me. I would like some more volatility
How wonderful for you. We are all rejoicing for your sake.

I was referencing your self-interest comment there, Pavel. Snark

*. I was just thinking those bond holders get a 30-50% hair cut. And perhaps housing would be properly priced... no meat hook required in my view.*

Everything will happen according to your expectations.

pavel.chichikov wrote:

Or as St. Teresa of Calcutta put it: More bitter tears are shed over prayers answered than prayers denied.

Now you've done it. If you have to raise ( the fraudulent, fanatic ) Mother Teresa to buttress your arguments, its the religious equivalent of Godwin's Law - reductio ad Teresum.

I was referencing your self-interest comment there, Pavel.

Most of us are self-interested. If we don't manage to restrain this natural instinct and think in terms of our community of interest we are facing dismal prospects. Just look around you.

A question. Where did the convention of stockholders wiped out, depositors protected, bondholders given a haircut come from?

Is there some reason depositors are sacrosanct, bondholders less so, stockholders held entirely to account? Is it votes? Is it monied interests?

In the present case, bondholders seem to be beating the 'model'. But where did this model originate?

pavel.chichikov wrote:

If we don't manage to restrain this natural instinct and think in terms of our community of interest we are facing dismal prospect

Here we are in agreement in principle. In practice, I wouldn't have the slightest idea of where to start. Donate money? Take in roommates? Pay more taxes?

If you have to raise ( the fraudulent, fanatic ) Mother Teresa

He's not an authority on the subject.

BTW, I too, by your definition no doubt , am a fanatic.

pavel.chichikov wrote:

Most of us are self-interested. If we don't manage to restrain this natural instinct and think in terms of our community of interest we are facing dismal prospects. Just look around you.

My community is outside of the US. The view is sunnier here.

pavel.chichikov wrote:

If we don't manage to restrain this natural instinct and think in terms of our community of interest we are facing dismal prospects. Just look around you.

Too much peace gives birth to conflict and vice versa. View it as a pendulum or some Eastern Yin/Yang. Either way, I agree with your quote that "prayers answered" are just as much of a curse (if not more so) than prayers unanswered.
.
However, War and his brethren are coming. Prayers, Pensions, and Powers That Be be dNo one 17 and under admittedned. It will be beautiful and ugly. May we live in interesting times indeed.

My community is outside of the US. The view is sunnier here.

We are all very happy for you.

Kruggles has finally shown us how long it takes to recover from Silence is Golden Brown poisoning. Somebody buy him a Double Dip to make him feel better. Then warn him that if he wants to ride in the Its a chopper, baby then he has to bring his own Cash, and no, I dont need a receipt this time.

Seriously, I found his "it's the rate of stimulus not the amount of stimulus" to be simplistic in the extreme.

burnside wrote:

Where did the convention of stockholders wiped out, depositors protected, bondholders given a haircut come from?

Guess the "depositors protected" component of it was the FDIC in the 30s. Am I following you?

Mother Teresa to buttress your arguments

I wasn't buttressing an argument.

Too much peace gives birth to conflict

Congenital madness gives birth to conflict. We are all subject to it.

Which is worse - bankers or terrorists wrote:

My community is outside of the US. The view is sunnier here.

What be happening ain't weather, it's climate. You got climate where you live? Then you'll feel what's coming no doubt.

Rob Dawg wrote:

I found his "it's the rate of stimulus not the amount of stimulus" to be simplistic in the extreme.

Given the dynamics of fiat, I agree with him that you need your money moving at a consistent/given rate that a lot of stop/start even if the funds flowing were in gigantic single instance sums. Now, Kruggles isn't really able to carry that thought process forward, but he didn't get his Nobel for doing that hard part of carrying it forward. Wink

Which is worse - bankers or terrorists wrote:

Guess the "depositors protected" component of it was the FDIC in the 30s. Am I following you?

There's that. I'm curious as to how the convention arose. We treat it here as a convention. Perhaps there's no ready answer - or perhaps it's one of our peculiarities at HCN and a few other places, and no convention at all - negotiable on a case-by-case basis.

Here we are in agreement in principle. In practice, I wouldn't have the slightest idea of where to start. Donate money? Take in roommates? Pay more taxes?

Get religion. Secular culture is self-defeating and self-doomed.

pavel.chichikov wrote:

Get religion.

Respectfully... My Head Just Exploded

. . . or I have a disordered mind. Yes. That's it.

Rob Dawg wrote:

What be happening ain't weather, it's climate. You got climate where you live? Then you'll feel what's coming no doubt.

I agree, but I think a lot of it is driven by demographics (obvious, I know). The trick is to drop yourself in countries with favorable demographics and expanding credit markets, or at least find ways to work there from afar. Less "climate change" there, as you imply.

pavel.chichikov wrote:

Congenital madness gives birth to conflict.

Peace does not exist within the heart of Man without some force exercising some form of control or influence over it. Be it God, your soul, your will, your boss, or Nature. Madness is born from those controls and influences real or imaginary. I've become too tainted by Eastern thought as I've gotten older to take one side of the other.
.
I've seen some horrible results from peaceful people in a peaceful environment.
I've seen some divine results from conflicted people in a conflicted environment.
.
I see good come from both, and it can suck in either environment. Economics is hard

pavel.chichikov wrote:

Secular culture is self-defeating and self-doomed.

Sounds like a former Soviet resident to me......

Which is worse - bankers or terrorists wrote:

The trick is to drop yourself in countries with favorable demographics and expanding credit markets...

That leaves you with what... 3? One of them just had a big earthquake and one exists only in my head.

pavel.chichikov wrote:

He's not an authority on the subject.

BTW, I too, by your definition no doubt , am a fanatic.

I have no idea what you are - more power to you to exercise your 1st amendment rights here. When it comes to you exercising the level of influence that Mother Teresa did - and may that day never arise - then its a different ballgame.

If he ( I'm pretty sure you mean Christopher Hitchens not the other HE ) is factually wrong then dispute it. But we already got to reductio ad Teresum so what's really the point eh ?

Invisible means of support are hardly the answer to our dilemna, but many will turn to it out of desperation.

Juvenal Delinquent wrote:

Invisible means of support are hardly the answer to our dilemna, but many will turn to it out of desperation.

The commentariat knows exactly where it comes from; Uncle Sugar.

yagij wrote:

Be it God, your soul, your will, your boss, or Nature. Madness is born from those controls and influences real or imaginary. I've become too tainted by Eastern thought as I've gotten older to take one side of the other.

It's possible that the attributes of "soul" or psyche that are necessary to develop run contrary to natural evolutionary programming... consider how diametrically opposed the virtues of amoral social darwinism and the virtues of Christianity stand, for example, in dichotomy of master/slave morality that Nietzsche pointed toward and yelled at... one is based on scientific understanding of the animal kingdom - so it is ideal for man if he purely is an animal.

Perfect week for stocks to go UP!

No news is good news for Wall*St's perpetual money creation machine.

Rob Dawg wrote:

The commentariat knows exactly where it comes from; Uncle Sugar.

"We're from the Government, and we're here to help!"

bearly wrote:

No news is good news for Wall*St's perpetual money creation machine.

I'm on record for the markets to finish dead flat tomorrow.

ResistanceIsFeudal wrote:

one is based on scientific understanding of the animal kingdom

I don't think that is a fair description of Christianity.

I have no idea what you are

You're giving me an impression of what you are.

I'm a Catholic, a cooperator in Opus Dei, a believer in God, and a respecter of the saints, including St. Theresa. I follow Jesus of Nazareth, true God and true man, who rose from the dead in the flesh on Easter Sunday.

Your good opinion of me compared to that is a bit attenuated in importance.

ResistanceIsFeudal wrote:

[C]onsider how diametrically opposed the virtues of amoral social darwinism and the virtues of Christianity stand, for example, in dichotomy of master/slave morality that Nietzsche pointed toward and yelled at... one is based on scientific understanding of the animal kingdom - so it is ideal for man if he purely is an animal.

Is that intended to be a brief summation of Nietzche?

Rob Dawg wrote:

I'm on record for the markets to finish dead flat tomorrow

On no volume.

Rob Dawg wrote:

Which is worse - bankers or terrorists wrote:
The trick is to drop yourself in countries with favorable demographics and expanding credit markets...
That leaves you with what... 3? One of them just had a big earthquake and one exists only in my head.

Take the globe in your office and look on the other side of it than most people on this board do (I know, it's tough). Trace a line between Istanbul, Tel Aviv, Cairo, Riyadh, Dubai, through the Ganges Valley, and Hong Kong, then down to Jakarta, and Sydney. Add Brazil in that as well.

That's the half of the world's population we all sort of forget about.

The priests of high finance realize that if their flock found out they were being fleeced, the game would be over. Can't have that can we?

bearly wrote:

I'm on record for the markets to finish dead flat tomorrow
On no volume.

What's your profit-making angle?

burnside wrote:

There's that. I'm curious as to how the convention arose. We treat it here as a convention.

I'll skip the depositors part cos I'm not sure where they are in the hierarchy - I'd have said insured creditors - so when a bank fails their claim is not on the bank but on the insurer ( i.e. FDIC ) - and that this is a matter of contract law. Similarly the place in the hierarchy of common shareholders, preferred shareholders, bond holders is a matter of contract law..

The law is the law - why conventionally people started using this type capital raising - which I guess goes to the convention aspect of your question - good question.. I'll have to go back and remind myself of the coffee houses in the 1700s ( 1600s?) and the funding of trading ships. I think a hundred years ago - common stock ( the lowest in the totem pole in terms of recovery after BK ) was rare. I"ll have to dig out the books/key phrases to google that.

pavel.chichikov wrote:

I'm a Catholic, a cooperator in Opus Dei

I am a level 10 Atheist. But I do enjoy exchanging ideas without pre-conceived biases.

pavel.chichikov wrote:

Your good opinion of me compared to that is a bit attenuated in importance.

OkeyDokey. Noted. Now lets move on.

When it comes to you exercising the level of influence that Mother Teresa did - and may that day never arise - then its a different ballgame.

But this above was not a bright thing to say. I claim no influence over anything.

Juvenal Delinquent wrote:

Mine goes to 11.

11 was too militant for me.

We always end up at the top of despised religions in front of the evangs year after year in surveys, but it's kind of funny, because we don't think any of it is real, so we could hardly be called religious, and therein lies the rub.

pavel.chichikov wrote:

But this above was not a bright thing to say. I claim no influence over anything.

Bejesus, Mother of all that's holy.. ALRIGHTTTTTTTTTTTTTT... I heard you the first time. You are pissed. I get that. Now can we move on.

*We lalways end up at the top of despised religions in front of the evangs year after year in surveys, *

Is that true, JD? Interesting.

Rob Dawg wrote:

I'm on record for the markets to finish dead flat tomorrow.

Asia opens in an hour. Wink

I have been reading about the Russian Revolution. There are some interesting parallels. They are not unique to Imperial Russia. In many ways I think they the same type of events and mindsets are common to all collapsing, or in danger of collapsing empires.

Unequal income distribution
Justice and law become a tool of the moneyed class.
The masses believe a change is needed in a vague but general way
The ruling class feels threatened
The ruling class begins to look backward at past glories and tries to associate themselves with those triumphs in the mind of the masses
The ruling class feels, paradoxically, invulnerable to change. TBTF
There is a growing disconnect between the ruling class and its servants at the actual governing (not policy makers) level and below.

Yes pavel,

It's no fun being lumped in with blind faith, and there isn't a damned thing you can do about it.

picosec wrote:

Rob Dawg wrote:

I'm on record for the markets to finish dead flat tomorrow.

Asia opens in an hour. Wink

You think their computers would dare do anything without our computers?

nova wrote:

I have been reading about the Russian Revolution. There are some interesting parallels. They are not unique to Imperial Russia. In many ways I think they the same type of events and mindsets are common to all collapsing, or in danger of collapsing empires.
Unequal income distribution
Justice and law become a tool of the moneyed class.
The masses believe a change is needed in a vague but general way
The ruling class feels threatened
The ruling class begins to look backward at past glories and tries to associate themselves with those triumphs in the mind of the masses
The ruling class feels, paradoxically, invulnerable to change. TBTF
There is a growing disconnect between the ruling class and its servants at the actual governing (not policy makers) level and below.

All of these things were subsequently characteristic of Soviet Russia, yes?

skk wrote:

Similarly the place in the hierarchy of common shareholders, preferred shareholders, bond holders is a matter of contract law..

Sufficient at that point, skk, to get at what puzzles me at base. The common expression here has been to show bondholders taking a hit, but retaining some portion. Then we so often move on to contemplating those remaining assets which are to be written down.

I don't understand how, if writedowns are to be taken, bondholders retain any portion of assets. But that may be a function of contract as well, as you say.

Also, goodness! A review of centuries of convention seems a large slice - you'll be looking into precursors - factoring? Surely only if it interests you greatly. . .

Which is worse - bankers or terrorists wrote:

In the 60s....lots of the racism, sexism, and hierarchical crap was purged out of the country.

Sadly I would have to argue that it was just driven underground. Much of it still exists.

Nove? Really not my reading of the Russian revolutions.

Take a look at the reformist Czar Paul in and around 1780 and subsequently. Should add a satisfying complexity that looks more like real events.

Yes pavel,

It's no fun being lumped in with blind faith, and there isn't a damned thing you can do about it.

Smile

Funny, I think of atheists as people blinded by a kind of faith, and believers as much more skeptical.

Nova, an important difference between the US of the early 21st century and Imperial Russia of the early 20th is the extraordinary backwardness of Russia. Even in the late 20th century there were areas of Russia that with some differences could have come out of previous centuries.

I was asked once by a high ranking Soviet journalist who had been widely traveled to compare the Soviet Union in terms of development with some other country. I ventured Turkey, and he laughed and said: Try Senegal.

All of these things were subsequently characteristic of Soviet Russia, yes?

Pretty much so, "which is worse..."

Earth Mother is calling me, wants to show me something real and tangible, gotta go.

Rajesh wrote:

So what's the opinion: Bank run or no bank run?

Neither will be as big or as destructive as the opium running conducted to sell the crop before the Taliban return to power and shut it all down. After that there will be the refugees running.

What a colossal, colossal disaster the Afghan invasion is, was, and will be.

To keep it in perspective, one must remember that the seemingly easy, quick, and cheap invasion of Afghanistan opened to path to invading Iraq by bolstering the belief that it would be easy, quick, and cheap.

pavel.chichikov wrote:

Funny, I think of atheists as people blinded by a kind of faith,

I understand. Most people do. Then my response is "I just don't believe" The literal meaning of atheist.

Atheist is such a harsh word, i've been on the receiveing end of persecution on the basis of my beliefs all of my life all across our land, and only the sheer horror of the Section 8 Years promulgated by a most religious man, has softened the country's stance on people like me, becuse we seem normal, in comparison.

burnside wrote:

skk wrote:

Similarly the place in the hierarchy of common shareholders, preferred shareholders, bond holders is a matter of contract law..

Sufficient at that point, skk, to get at what puzzles me at base. The common expression here has been to show bondholders taking a hit, but retaining some portion. Then we so often move on to contemplating those remaining assets which are to be written down.

Even more fundamentally we are discussing application of reward commensurate with risk. There are poor dumb people out there that still hold on to the illusion that their stock makes them owners of a company. They still make movies where the hero wins by gaining a 50.1% control. Wrong. Public companies have been looted out from underneath the owners. Dilution, preferred, debt precedence, bond precedence, absent SEC, on and on. Stockholders are the new canon fodder for the generals on the hill.

Which is worse - bankers or terrorists

An Imperial Russia

Login or register to post comments
Syndicate content