Massive unexpectation.

Nemo wrote:

Massive unexpectation.

Survivor bias?

Good Morning.

Up the down stair case. Wink

suggests, but no italics.....

hmmmmmmmmmmmmmm.............

(I feel like the dorks on CNBC who used to analyze whether Greenspan was carrying a briefcase on his way into FOMC meetings.)

Lagging indicator discount sales.

Hey, CR has stopped italicizing the "suggests". Tongue

Now this is a tight range:

ECB: euro-zone growth seen at 0.5% to 2.3% in 2011

In related news, 472,000 egos were squashed this week, film @ 11.

So, given the recent Hindenburg Omen fun, where all the bears were lured in for a 2.5% shearing, I wonder if the bull are being set up next....

I mean, it's been a super-easy way to make money...... set your GTC buy order for DIA at 100. Lather, rinse, repeat.

That works, of course.... until it doesn't.

(COME ON MARKET...... ONE TIME!!!!!)

Vic wrote:

Hey, CR has stopped italicizing the "suggests".

jinx

Eric wrote:

suggests, but no italics.....

Maybe Nemo's Monkey voted against italics at this week's meeting. We'll have to wait until the minutes are released. This could signal a fundamental change in CR's stance.

Vic wrote:

Hey, CR has stopped italicizing the "suggests".

There were rumors early this week that he might drop the italics. Some take that as confirmation that suggested weakness will be with us for some time.

So the "beat" was 3k jobs, and was last week's revision "down"?

Mr Slippery wrote:

There were rumors early this week that he might drop the italics.

Maybe he was trying to use the new strikethrough and blew it.

(yeah I know... formatting on HCN isn't related to the main blog).

Cinco-X wrote:

So the "beat" was 3k jobs, and was last week's revision "down"?

Yes from 473,000 to 478,000.

Morgan Stanley Slashes Its U.S. Growth Forecast

Sources of weakness: Difficult diagnosis: We think that the main culprit for weakness relative to our forecast is less-than- expected support from global growth. But other factors – temporary loss of stimulus measures and hesitation resulting from policy uncertainty – likely also played a role.

I wonder if job losses were a consideration?

Cinco-X wrote:

So the "beat" was 3k jobs, and was last week's revision "down"?

CR wrote:

Claims for last week were revised up from 473,000 to 478,000. So the level this week is about the same as initially reported last week.

Altogether, 9.7 million people were collecting some type of unemployment benefits

I wonder what the other 10 million are collecting? Nickle cans no doubt.

And to my shock and aw...the unemployment percentage remains unchanged...400,000 plus continuing claims and no change in the unemployment rate...AMAZING.....Our Governments are glorious.

U.S. Avoids Recession as Data Can’t Get Much Worse (Update1) - Bloomberg.com

"The U.S. economy is so bad that the chance of avoiding a double dip back into recession may actually be pretty good."

My Head Just Exploded

Vonbek: They aren't talking the natural economy, they are talking their book and equities.

What a positive spin. Try this for size: when you're dead, you no longer have to fear death.

Is retail sales "up" compared YoY or versus previous month? Seasonality of back-to-school and "tax-free" saledays might make August atypical in month to month.

.....on par in the past with about September 2001.........I'm trying to remember if anything of any consequence happened then.......hmmmm......

Good Morning, Peoples!

"The U.S. economy is so bad that the chance of avoiding a double dip back into recession may actually be pretty good."

If loaning you is wrong, I don't want to be writing you no checks.

Cinco-X wrote:

Not sure what to believe...

Believe both. This is the kind of information we should expect if CR's forecast that we will enter a not-a-technical-recession recession-like phase is correct. The numbers show very subdued improvements, while sentiment stays in the doldrums. While my own business is doing quite well, that is only because my clients hire me to help them automate, which puts the lowest-skilled staff out of work (the vast majority are shifted to other parts of the company, businesses really are doing more with less, the productivity numbers coming out of this era could be eye-popping). For most people however, I think job insecurity is the common milieu. So it is easy to see how in aggregate, we could be treading water or even improving at the margins, but in fractal detail at the individual level, no one feels secure enough to go out and spend.

Back to the Future

Two struggling units of Lehman Brothers Holdings, the bankrupt U.S. investment bank, need hundreds of millions of dollars in capital to stave off failure that could cost Lehman billions, court documents show.

By the end of that sentence, I had lost a significant number of brain synapses who flung themselves to their deaths rather than keep processing what I was reading. Lehman units failing in August? What could be bad about that?

BSR wrote:

.....on par in the past with about September 2001.........I'm trying to remember if anything of any consequence happened then.......hmmmm......

Yeah, I was in Europe most of September in 2001, a space odyssey of sorts.

We had the Europeans in total solidarity with us, I saw so many ad hoc street memorials, with candles and signs and flowers all over, but we threw it away for nothing.

...upon my return to LAX, every other car on the 405 had a plastic Old Glory hanging from it's window jamb

yourapostasy wrote:

we could be treading water or even improving at the margins,

......I even could believe "improving at the margins". Most of the big firms' financials were up mostly through belt-tightening, tax relief schemes, but not extra sales....

Cinco-X wrote:

Back-to-School Sales Bust Says WSJ

With so many children being sold to pay bills, I fully expected this.

The four-week average dropped 0.005%!!!! Fantastic!!!

This should help with those pending home sales....new home sales ...auto sales and so on....the market loves it.

ROFLOL. I didn't mean anything special about it ... of course the 480s is much higher than when I was using the italics ... hmmm ...

best to all

amiramr0 wrote on Thu, 9/2/2010 - 7:43 am
Now this is a tight range:
ECB: euro-zone growth seen at 0.5% to 2.3% in 2011

2.3% is the preliminary and .5% is the final number?

An economist running out of "unexpected" Kool-Aid ?

Articles like that make me frustrated Cinco-X. Rather than explain how a family could easily live on $50k, it creates all these false impressions. Utilities are not fixed, they are variable. Ours rarely top $100/month, even in the summer heat of Georgia. You don't need an expensive internet/cable package of $100 (we get by on $25/month).You don't need two $400/month leased cars, buy used ones for a fraction of the cost, own them outright and save that money. There that's ~$1,000/month I saved them in about 30 seconds, increasing their post-tax take home by 24% compared to their overall salary.

The key to cashflow in America, is not what you make, it's how you spend it.

Hey Volker - from the last thread you posted some dialog from a book. I can't place it but I know I've read that book. Can you please share the title.

traderwalt wrote:

2.3% is the preliminary and .5% is the final number?

2012 is the final number.

Looks like traders in the bond market are developing a little twitch in their trigger fingers.

Need a presser from Ben, to remind them there's a buyer with unlimited pocket depth.

chapel_of_words wrote:

The key to cashflow in America, is not what you make, it's how you spend it.

In my humble opinion, the key to cashflow in the United States is continuing to extend UE benefits.

debt charges Now back to the yacht race debt charges
.
.
.
.
.
.
.

:yellow submarine:

Washington Post is on board the recovery train.

Five reasons for economic optimism

Savings

The savings rate rose from 2.7 percent at the start of the recession, in the beginning of 2008, to 5.9 percent in July. That means households are farther along in readjusting their spending patterns to match their incomes than was previously realized. That should make them freer to spend more in the months ahead.

Credit

Gradual healing is underway in the financial sector, making loans more available for households and businesses. The most recent edition of the Federal Reserve's senior loan officers survey showed that more banks have eased lending standards for corporate loans. For companies with access to global capital markets, interest rates remain quite low, which supports growth.

Manufacturing

The industrial sector is actually holding up. July industrial production was up 1 percent, and early indicators show that the expansion continued last month. The Institute for Supply Management said Wednesday that its index of activity in the manufacturing sector rose in August, to 56.3 from 55.5 (numbers above 50 indicate expansion). It appears that manufacturers view final demand for their products as steady enough to keep producing.

Housing

No one is expecting home-building activity to return to pre-crisis levels for a very long time. But in July, builders began building new housing units at a paltry annual rate of 546,000 annual rate, less than half of what's needed to keep up with population growth. The housing market just can't contract that much more. When housing starts fell from a 2.3 million annual rate in early 2006 to the low of 477,000 in April 2009, it was a major drain on the economy, but a decline of that scale is now mathematically impossible.

Trade

A steep rise in imports dragged down the economy in the second quarter to an unprecedented degree. If the trade deficit had not widened, the gross domestic product would have grown at a healthy 5 percent annual rate. With many other world economies doing better than the U.S. economy right now, exports may be set to rise more than imports in the coming quarters, which would help domestic growth.

chapel_of_words wrote:

The key to cashflow in America, is not what you make, it's how you spend it.

....let me try the new toy here.....

The key to cashflow in America, is not what you make, it's how you spend it. DON'T spend it.......whew - that was tough. Fixed It For Ya

chapel_of_words wrote:

There that's ~$1,000/month I saved them in about 30 seconds, increasing their post-tax take home by 24% compared to their overall salary.

Of course, they low balled a bunch of the other figures, especially housing. At the beginning of the article, they stated in effect that half of the country live with less income than that, so obviously it can be done. It's just hard to save when you're living like that....

Morning, And did Dave Ramsey just post upstream. My motto is make do with what you have, frigging Wallstreet and O is on my short list today.

Elvis wrote:

In my humble opinion, the key to cashflow in the United States is continuing to extend UE benefits.

An acquaintance of mine just ran out her 99 weeks.

During that 99 weeks, she continued to see a personal trainer, and go out clubbing.

My Head Just Exploded

Black Star Ranch wrote:

The key to cashflow in America, is not what you make, it's how you spend it. DON'T spend it.......whew - that was tough.

A lesson our federal government needs to learn....

*In my humble opinion, the key to cashflow in the United States is continuing to extending UE benefits. *

Been there, done that. The shock of going from your salary take-home to UE benefits is big. But it teaches you a great deal about what costs you can cut, what it really takes to get by. Maintaining those habits after leaving UE benefits is the key to not having to worry about it again. Too many folks take the new boost in income as justification to continue past bad habits.

I'm sensing some sort of recovery going on. I hope it's not politically fabricated (for upcoming elections).

My prognosis is some recovery with a touch of Tinfoil Hat

Eric wrote:

During that 99 weeks, she continued to see a personal trainer,

He was probably "hawt"...

Economics is hard Grade

Those really old-fashioned and much hated virtues of bygone eras by the corporatist...thrift and value are making a comeback either by necessity or choice.

Out: Clubbing baby seals

In: Clubbing till the money runs out

chapel_of_words wrote:

But it teaches you a great deal about what costs you can cut, what it really takes to get by.

It teaches some people that. See my post above.

Vonbek777 wrote:

U.S. Avoids Recession as Data Can’t Get Much Worse (Update1) - Bloomberg.com

It has come up red 4 times in a row, the next spin has to be black.

No...it's really not. Walk down any grocery aisle and you'll find a 50% variation in price per oz. of whatever food you're looking for. And yet people still can't be bothered to take an extra 5seconds to read the label and buy the generic. Don't even dare ask them to take a few minutes to organize coupons.

Juvenal Delinquent wrote:

In: Clubbing till the money runs out
In: Clubbing till credit is cut Fixed It For Ya

I stand corrected BSR!

No discount can equal choosing not to buy the item to begin with! Wink

chapel_of_words wrote:

Too many folks take the new boost in income as justification to continue past bad habits.

.....kinda like our many branches of government.....vis a vis all new taxes

that is changing too. Look, people got exceptionally lazy, it takes time to change habits. Those who aren't forced to change habits often times won't until....something clicks. Even if they CAN afford the 'name brand' at a higher price, once fear is instilled, they may not.

The VALUE of doing a tiny bit of arithmetic in your head is making a come back.

chapel_of_words wrote:

Lehman units failing in August? What could be bad about that?

Nothing, if you are TBTF. Mo money!

chapel_of_words wrote:

No discount can equal choosing not to buy the item to begin with!

Unless it's the FiveFinger discount

chapel_of_words wrote:

No...it's really not.

It's not that I disagree with your premise, it's just that if it were easy, everyone would be doing it. I have no CC debt, I finish paying for my new car in about 4 months, no mortgage, and recently bought a house with cash and a 401k loan that runs me a couple of hundred a month. Yes, people can live frugally, but it is NOT easy. It takes dedication and discipline. If it were easy, everyone would be doing it.

Not Dave Ramsey, just "one of those guys" who couldn't make monthly payments on $65k/year, then lost my job, had to live on UE, learned how to save. I actually paid more debt off while unemployed than I had before, and by maintaining the habits after finding work was able to become debt free within 5 years after losing the job. Now I'm trying the same thing on weight loss; the concept of budgeting works equally well there too...as well as the key of "not eating is the best way to avoid consuming calories". Big smile

WSJ: HP raises bid for 3PAR to $33 a share.
My Head Just Exploded

Mike in Long Island wrote:

Hey Volker - from the last thread you posted some dialog from a book. I can't place it but I know I've read that book. Can you please share the title.

I'm working on another road trip story. I wrote it. Working title is, Undetermined.

you read it somewhere, teehee heetee

thanks for the come back

Cinco-X wrote:

Yes, people can live frugally, but it is NOT easy. It takes dedication and discipline. If it were easy, everyone would be doing it.

......like quitting smoking or booze, it's a lifestyle change. Initially tough - subsequently a no-brainer. More people aren't doing it because they have the "Keeping Up Disease"; buying all the cool sh**.

Time to Milk.........Hasta........

It's Official: Demand Needs To Accelerate, Or Business Profits Are Toast

Nonfarm business sector labor productivity decreased at a 1.8 percent annual rate during the second quarter of 2010, the U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics reported today as hours increased 3.5 percent and output
increased 1.6 percent. (All quarterly percent changes in this release are seasonally adjusted annual rates.) The second-quarter gain in hours worked was the largest since the first quarter of 2006. From the second quarter of 2009 to the second quarter of 2010, productivity and output both grew 3.7 percent and hours were unchanged (tables A and 2). Nonfarm business productivity increased at an average annual rate of 2.5 percent from 2000 through 2009.

*It takes dedication and discipline. *

Change is never easy. That's why so few do it I think. Wasn't it Heinlen, "People will never change until the pain of remaining the same exceeds the pain of changing." But part of the problem is many have a false notion that it can't be done, that there's some sort of structural or natural law obstacle. As you pointed out, dedication and discipline, are entirely within the control of the person. I've pointed out to people that they'll spend 2600 hours a year working for a boss, who they hope, out of some sliver and shred of optimism, will give them a 2-5% cost of living raise at the end of the year. Whereas if they just spent, say, 1% of that time a month, learning how to spend less (or not spend at all) they could produce the equivilant of a 20-40% net take home increase in available money.

The VALUE of doing a tiny bit of arithmetic in your head is making a come back.

Most (all?) stores include the unit pricing, so the arithmetic has already been done for you,

WSJ: HP raises bid for 3PAR to $33 a share.

Did Dell raise the price and I missed it? Or is HP just reflexively outbidding itself? Kind of like they put in two EBay orders on the same item and forgot to turn one off.

I'm a big advocate of personal responsibility...but there is another side to this equation. To some extent the poor get to color their lives between the lines cooperations place around them. From electricity plans to cell phone plans...companies are gaming profits on the backs of the poor. This is nothing new of course...but it is one thing to live with a view that you are working toward a future, and another to just survive within these lines...but realistically, the end game is to make these people consume as much as their income during their working years as possible. I maintain that you have to change the system as well as people's habits...otherwise the cycle continues.

And yet people still can't be bothered to take an extra 5seconds to read the label and buy the generic.

Not guilty.

Don't even dare ask them to take a few minutes to organize coupons.

Guilty. Having a decent job results in a certain amount of complacency.

On a similar note, a recent article about HEB, aTexas based grocery chain that has grown in spite of the Walmart onslaught, talked about an exercise that the CEO assigned his top executives. They were told to shop their store assuming they were feeding a family of four on $25 or $50 a week. This is how the CEO retained their country, working class heritage even throughout their expansion into upper class neighborhoods.

hiker90 wrote:

They were told to shop their store assuming they were feeding a family of four on $25 or $50 a week.

Poaching is not just for eggs.

chapel_of_words wrote:

Did Dell raise the price and I missed it? Or is HP just reflexively outbidding itself? Kind of like they put in two EBay orders on the same item and forgot to turn one off.

I didn't hear about Dell increasing their bid, I think HP is taking a preemptive strike, and 3PAR enjoying every minute of it.

Edit: they did: H-P raises 3Par bid to $33 a share - MarketWatch

chapel_of_words wrote:

was able to become debt free

A fellow debt slave running from the Bankster and government bondage! Freedom!

During that 99 weeks, she continued to see a personal trainer, and go out clubbing.

Pretty sensible if you ask me. She is likely setting herself up to be famous for being famous like Paris Hilton or LiLo. If that fails she will be in good enough shape to rake in some Cash, and no, I dont need a receipt spinning on brass poles.

Cinco-X wrote:

Israeli entrepreneurs: MBAs are for wusses | The Economist

I thought MBA's are what the whole Jerry's Kids telethon was about.

chapel_of_words wrote:

Don't even dare ask them to take a few minutes to organize coupons

PULEEEEEEEASE.

More Cost shifting. And some fking how I always end up behind one of the chumps that has a handful of those crumpled up coupons in line at the grocery - waiting while the ice cream melts in my cart.

Essentially all of Trader Joe's products are generic items, as in no major brands, but I don't feel like i'm shopping for generics, for when I think of generic items in a big supermarket, it's all lower shelf stuff, which has us trained to think it's inferior, compared to national brands.

They are supposed to do that, often I find missing ones on some products or class of products...and those that aren't updated and scan for a different price.

Its so ingrained in me, I couldn't stop doing it if I wanted to. Thats the future that won't die easily once it is re-instilled. We are early in this trend so this behavior is uneven currently. You do see some of this showing up otherwise, the latest example are the bleak numbers coming out of restaurants. There's another factor and that is of value. I will pay more if the value is better. Cheaper doesn't always equate to better. There are some products I will pay more for with cheaper options sitting by their side. Todays industrialized farming means something completely different in the cost/value and now safety of those things you put in your mouth.

Poaching is not just for eggs.

LOL. And once again my cubicle neighbors know I'm surfing the web. Engineering is not that funny. OK, just simply not funny.

Don't even dare ask them to take a few minutes to organize coupons.

...ya know, the real test is whether you save green stamps.

chapel_of_words wrote:

The key to cash flow in America, is not what you make, it's how you spend it

Are you channeling Slumdog? My Head Just Exploded

Portends is a much classier word than suggests.

hiker90 wrote:

Engineering is not that funny.

You should visit The Daily WTF: Curious Perversions in Information Technology, if you don't already.

Are you channeling Slumdog?
Why are you offering to make me a website? Big smile

I wouldn't touch gold with a 10' pole OR 50' of rope.

Nov 3 8A - Morning in America.

chapel_of_words wrote:

The key to cashflow in America, is not what you make, it's how you spend it

The key all of my life has been to spend it as fast as possible, for it continually loses value over time.

It takes $717 in 2009 to equal the buying power of $100, from when I made my grand entrance, how about you?

Measuring Worth - Purchasing Power of US Dollar

*nd some fking how I always end up behind one of the chumps that has a handful of those crumpled up coupons in line at the grocery - waiting while the ice cream melts in my cart. *

Pick your evil: More time spent in line at the grocery market behind coupon puller or or more taxes paid to the government so the person in front of you won't have to pull coupons?

+1.

Price and value are indeed different, on many levels. Listened to a discussion about how the local farmer's market is "too expensive," compared to the grocery store. The hidden factor that the produce is organic, local, unsprayed and much of it (zucchini blossoms, fresh okra, heirloom tomatoes, purple fingerling potatoes) simply cannot be found in any grocery seldom gets discussed.

OT, I went to the local broker's meeting yesterday,closings were strong,with few deals falling out. One newly opened escrow. 21 price reductions.23 buyers reported looking for specific kinds of property. Price reductions ran fro a low of 10%,most were in the 20% range.52 agents were present. Most homes on the tour were overpriced. Those prices would,for the most part been fine in may 2010 but are too high by 15-25% now. The market is exceptionally volatile and pricing very difficult.

bearly wrote:

More Cost shifting. And some fking how I always end up behind one of the chumps that has a handful of those crumpled up coupons in line at the grocery - waiting while the ice cream melts in my cart.

That would be me. Mrs Dawg and I do the math from time to time. Coupon clipping pays more than $90/hr tax free.

Juvenal Delinquent wrote:

The key all of my life has been to spend it as fast as possible, for it continually loses value over time.

It takes $717 in 2009 to equal the buying power of $100, from when I made my grand entrance, how about you?

Measuring Worth - Purchasing Power of US Dollar

Excellent website. Bic Flick

Bernanke says there was 'no way' to rescue Lehman Bros.

Is this the same guy that said he was not sure why Gold rices were rising?

I wouldn't touch gold with a 10' pole OR 50' of rope.

Good more for me.

Gold 1,254 +6 +0.51%

Ya I see what your saying Gold sucks.

Eric wrote:

You should visit The Daily WTF: Curious Perversions in Information Technology, if you don't already.

Big smile

The key all of my life has been to spend it as fast as possible, for it continually loses value over time.
It takes $717 in 2009 to equal the buying power of $100, from when I made my grand entrance, how about you?

Not sure how long ago that grand entrance was to account for a 700% decline in the value of your money. But I bet I can beat you hands down in comparable buying power increase for a unit of money by waiting to buy something rather than buying it new. Call it used, discounted, or bought out of an auction when someone spending on the bleeding edge goes bankrupt and we can acquire all their nice stuff for pennies. Kindle DX went from $489 to Kindle 3 $189 in, what 3 years. 250% in 3 years. How many years was your 700% loss of purchasing power again? Big smile

hiker90 wrote:

And once again my cubicle neighbors know I'm surfing the web. Engineering is not that funny. OK, just simply not funny.

It is when you are doing it wrong.

I goes beyond food but with every part of life. It requires some thought and increasingly research into the products chosen, understanding business cycles, understanding which products are designed for quick and punishing obsolescence vs $$$ spent. Not everyone is capable or willing to spend the TIME required to do this. Many don't even have the time, many don't have the deductive reasoning skills. Those deductive reasoning skills aren't encouraged. Advertising in particular show the utter contempt.

Nothing worthwhile is ever easy.

Rob Dawg wrote:

That would be me. Mrs Dawg and I do the math from time to time. Coupon clipping pays more than $90/hr tax free.

That was the breakthrough for me Rob Dawg, calculating the time spent generating savings in terms of tax free $$/hr. Because you've already paid taxes on the income. People look at me strange when I say a person making $45k a year can live the same lifestyle as someone making $90k a year if they just spend time to buy all the same things at 50% off. But it's true.

chapel_of_words wrote:

How many years was your 700% loss of purchasing power again?

I blasted up around the same time Yuri Gargarin did, orbited in mom for 9 months, the usual story, but your time-frame may vary.

Nanoo-Nanoo wrote:

Not everyone is capable or willing to spend the TIME required to do this. Many don't even have the time, many don't have the deductive reasoning skills. Those deductive reasoning skills aren't encouraged. Advertising in particular show the utter contempt.

Time and money are almost entirely interchangeable. You can spend time to create money (working for a wage, researching how to save, finding savings), or conversely you can spend money to create time (fly instead of drive, leverage technology or speciality services). It depends on what you're short more of, which way you want to do it. The people only making $50k a year, they probably see the value in spending time to create more money. The people making $250k a year, might find more value in identifying ways to leverage money to create time. Of course the ideal is to save both time AND money, the twofer! Big smile

Nanoo-Nanoo wrote:

Advertising in particular show the utter contempt.
Nothing worthwhile is ever easy.

Which is why we need shepherds and sheepdogs guarding the flock instead of letting the wolves run the show. The parasites are always with us...but you can't let them kill the host. We've lost that fine art of moderation.

Which is why we need shepherds and sheepdogs guarding the flock instead of letting the wolves run the show.

Or arm the sheep. You ever see a wolf approaching a sheep packing a 40cal?

hiker90 wrote:

Engineering is not that funny. OK, just simply not funny.

Really!? Try putting a 35V electrolytic cap in your neighbor's unpowered line strip and wait for him (not that many her's in engineering) to turn it on....

Is this the same guy that said he was not sure why Gold rices were rising?

Did Midas work in a Chinese restaurant?

You should visit The Daily WTF: Curious Perversions in Information Technology, if you don't already.

:addstoFavorites:

Thanks!

They came first for the minimum wage workers,
and I didn't speak up because I wasn't working a shit job.

Then they came for the trade unionists,
and I didn't speak up because they were corrupt and deserved it.

Then they came for the mid-level managers,
and I didn't speak up because I wasn't mid-level.

Then they came for me
and by that time no one was left to speak up.

Rob Dawg wrote:

That would be me. Mrs Dawg and I do the math from time to time. Coupon clipping pays more than $90/hr tax free.

There aren't that many coupons for generic and store brands. Otherwise, I'd be right there with ya'...

If the banks where TBTF then how does this work now that they are even bigger? Lehman got closed down, How did that work out? The banks are to big and need to be broken down to smaller ones so they can fail with out systemic failure of the system. Political crooks.

September 2, 2010

Consideration will be given to lifting the grain ban only after information about next year’s grain balance becomes available, Russian Prime Minister Vladimir Putin said at a government presidium meeting on Sept. 2, Interfax reported.

Is this the same guy that said he was not sure why Gold rices were rising?

pavel wrote:

Did Midas work in a Chinese restaurant?

When I was in Hong Kong in the 1980's one of the high rises windows had a gold sheen to them, and if memory serves, workers drilled into the windows trying to extract the precious, or something like that.

Perhaps Anak will remember the details?

September 2, 2010

Russian President Dmitri Medvedev has established a commission to quickly respond to changes on food markets, Interfax reported Sept. 2. He said that while it does not need to be permanent, the panel should operate through the year. The commission will coordinate with federal and regional governments, producers and producers’ self-regulating organizations, he said. Russia has sufficient grain, Medvedev said, and an increase in prices is unwarranted. He added that the government will make sure citizens have access to affordable food.

Rob Dawg wrote:

Coupon clipping pays more than $90/hr tax free

I don't voluntarily take pay cuts Big smile

chapel_of_words wrote:

Or arm the sheep. You ever see a wolf approaching a sheep packing a 40cal?

No, I would rather have shepherds. Less chance for mob rule and demagoguery. The same reasons sheep aren't good with money and are targets for wolves, make them more dangerous when armed. Maybe the republic was never more than an ideal in reality, but I'm not ready to abandon it and enter Abaddon yet.

Cinco-X wrote:

There aren't that many coupons for generic and store brands. Otherwise, I'd be right there with ya'...

That's the easy part for me. The fallback is almost always on the generic. Usually it takes a sale + a coupon to make a non-generic worth it. Though I've found that name brand stuff is usually either on sale, or on a coupon, for one store chain - and on the other for a different chain. As long as your chain takes competitors coupons you can play them off that way. Down here it's Kroger and Publix. If one thing's on sale at kroger, it's on coupon at Publix, and you bring in the Publix coupon. Also lots of coupons for non-grocery things that can be big bucks. I remember some rental car coupons that saved us about $70 for about 10minutes of work prior to heading out on vacation. During those 10min we were making the equivilant of $420/hr, that's hard to beat!

pavel.chichikov wrote on Thu, 9/2/2010 - 8:49 am
September 2, 2010
Consideration will be given to lifting the grain ban only after information about next year’s grain balance becomes available, Russian Prime Minister Vladimir Putin said at a government presidium meeting on Sept. 2, Interfax reported.

"Plant wheat in the dust, and your bins will bust", as the saying goes...

Disclosure anyone, transparency anyone? When access to information that affects your life in a profound ways is hidden then the gig is up, trust is broken. All the hype around owning stocks as the cure for what ails us was just another marketing campaign designed to sap the wealth from people who don't have that economics degree.

The idea of making (expecting) everyone a stock market guru is just as stupid as marketing million dollar homes to cashiers with 'creative' financing options.

So you work your day job and by night, you must tend to your savings in the markets. I don't think so.

Utoh Glass-Steagall rant is rising in my throat again.

Vonbek777 wrote:

No, I would rather have shepherds. Less chance for mob rule and demagoguery. The same reasons sheep aren't good with money and are targets for wolves, make them more dangerous when armed.

Well as long as your honest about keeping the people sheep. I assume there's a waiting list for the sheperds? It sounds like an awfully good gig if one can get it.

amiramr0 wrote:

You should visit The Daily WTF: Curious Perversions in Information Technology, if you don't already.

Big smile

At the start of the event handler was this:

//Server.ScriptTimeout = 3600;
//Server.ScriptTimeout = 10800;
Server.ScriptTimeout = 21600; //six hours should probably be enough. If it keeps crashing, raise this.

The code went downhill from there.

Nanoo-Nanoo wrote :

Advertising in particular show the utter contempt

Here's a cold-blooded example of that, from today's NYT:

Child’s Ordeal Shows Dangers of Antipsychotic Drugs - NY Times

Even the most reluctant prescribers encounter a marketing juggernaut that has made antipsychotics the nation’s top-selling class of drugs by revenue, $14.6 billion last year, with prominent promotions aimed at treating children. In the waiting room of Kyle’s original child psychiatrist, children played with Legos stamped with the word Risperdal, made by Johnson & Johnson. It has since lost its patent on the drug and stopped handing out the toys.

Thanks Nanoo,even here we see the reality impaired. HI THERE! How's the water?

It is when you are doing it wrong.

And I just saw Cinco's comment. Laughing out loud My comments must be a reflection of the looming report deadline. Our thermal/vac test went really well and I'm the lucky one who gets to write the report.

Humans have great variation in intelligence levels and moral behavior. You need people with high intelligence/high morality to protect low intelligence/high morality people from high intelligence/low morality people and to control the low intelligence/low morality people. It sucks, but it's the way we evolved. We need leaders/shepherds/whatever we call them.

I don't do coupons, but as my occupation was being a savvy buyer and seller (I could switch hats effortlessly) I still have the thrill of the hunt in me, even if i'm reduced to shopping for food, sporting goods and the like.

Even the most reluctant prescribers encounter a marketing juggernaut that has made antipsychotics the nation’s top-selling class of drugs by revenue, $14.6 billion last year, with prominent promotions aimed at treating children.

If there are any No one 17 and under admitted comments to be made, it should be about the item above.

pavel.chichikov wrote:

The commission will coordinate with federal and regional governments, producers and producers’ self-regulating organizations, he said. Russia has sufficient grain, Medvedev said, and an increase in prices is unwarranted.

....wow........this sounds like a 'news' release from before 1989.

SPOOL wrote:

Dangers of Antipsychotic Drugs - NY Times

It seems like the markets might make use of some of those today....

OT again, I am seeing prices in Sebastopol that are getting close to cash flowing. Not many yet,but some. 1997-1998 was the last time this was true. It looks like we will hit 2001 -2002 prices in the next month or two. These are IN NOMINAL DOLLARS. Ouch,for some.

Ever year we donate a care package of toothbrushes, toothpaste, deodorant, hair care products, band aids, etc to the poor. We get these on sale, clearance, double coupon, etc. We give about $150 worth that typically "costs" us -$10.

SPIKE!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

Eric wrote:

SPIKE!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

How're yer puts?

....wow........this sounds like a 'news' release from before 1989.

Yep. Except that in those days the price of bread would never go up. Never The stability of the state depended on it.

chapel_of_words wrote:

Well as long as your honest about keeping the people sheep.

I don't keep anyone a sheep. If they can drink from the fountains of critical thinking, they will find a way out. You can 'educate' people how to live better, fuller lives...but all you are doing is reprogramming them...they are still sheep. That is why you have to change the system too. As for being a shepherd... it isn't a gig, it is a calling, used to be tied in with honor, responsibility, duty. You know protect the innocent....and all that jazz...basically being a person instead of a parasite.

Cinco-X wrote:

How're yer puts?

Hating it.

Looks like the Precious took a bat upside the head right about then too.

Yay Pending Home Sales!

Ain't nothing going to stop the Its not easy being green express.

Until that brick wall comes into play.

Our world is undergoing dramatic changes,it takes a great deal of mental flexibility to discard assumptions that in some cases were valid for generations. Many will do so reluctantly,many more will be unable to do so at all. These are our neighbors,be kind as kind as you can because reality will be plenty cruel enough for all.

Gotta love the testimony: I would hate for us to end this hearing thinking that because of a bunch of misunderstandings and mistakes that Lehman turned out to be the only investment bank that had to go down," he said.

Wonder if anyone's going to bring up Lehman's cooking of the book with 505's and being bankrupt for about 15days before the short raids started.

Washington Post reporting this morning:
Elizabeth Warren "unexpectedly" cancels scheduled class teachings
http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2010/09/01/AR2010090106733.html

Tom Stone wrote:

These are our neighbors,be kind as kind as you can because reality will be plenty cruel enough for all.

My family is suffering their stupidity. You ask a lot Tom.

Rattner depicts White House Chief of Staff Rahm Emanuel as a force to be reckoned with who disparaged unions -- once quipping "Fuck the UAW" -- and who effectively supervised Treasury Secretary Tim Geithner during his first rocky months on the job by dictating his public appearances and staff picks.

He also depicts infighting between economic advisers Larry Summers and Austan Goolsbee and describes FDIC Chair Sheila Bair as a stubborn obstacle to the work of the auto rescue team. And Rattner paints colorful portraits of auto executives such as Fiat Chairman Sergio Marchionne, who once barked to Chrysler executives, "Do you think I am fucking stupid?"

Rattner also claimed that Obama supporters and donors barraged the White House with calls, emails and memos to take stronger steps, including nationalizing the big banks, to deal with the financial crisis. He says that Obama's economic team "veered dangerously close to having the government take control of the two most troubled banks, Bank of America and Citigroup." Even Summers seemed fond of the idea -- launching a project known as "USG as Shareholder."

Steven Rattner's 'Overhaul' Pulls No Punches On Obama Administration's Auto Rescue But Minimizes His Own Troubles (EXCLUSIVE)

Vonbek777 wrote:

As for being a shepherd... it isn't a gig, it is a calling, used to be tied in with honor, responsibility, duty. You know protect the innocent....and all that jazz...basically being a person instead of a parasite.

I'm not sure you understand why shepherds are out there. It's not for the long term health of the sheep. I do agree though on the difference between being a person or a parasite, why I got irked at the article to begin with. So much easier to make everyone think they're doomed, they'll never get ahead etc. than help them understand how they can solve things.

Cinco-X wrote:

Now THIS in unexpected:
Jobs recovery is stronger than past recessions - Yahoo! Finance
Really?

If you look at the scary jobs chart, and imagine that many companies cut into bone as far as staffing was concerned, it doesn't seem especially surprising that we've seen some rehiring back up to a still bare level.

dryfly has provided great commentary on manufacturing, where cannibalization has meant that a few companies have had more business than they can handle.

Whether this job growth continues is another matter. And of course, we still face many people stuck in underwater houses, hitting labor mobility.

The commission will coordinate with federal and regional governments, producers and producers’ self-regulating organizations, he said. Russia has sufficient grain, Medvedev said, and an increase in prices is unwarranted.

I think this is the planting season for winter wheat. The last report I read said that it is still too dry to plant in some areas although some other previously dry areas have received enough rainfall for planting to proceed. IIRC the winter wheat also has to establish itself ("green up") before winter to protect it from the bitter cold.

Vonbek777 wrote:

it is a calling, used to be tied in with honor, responsibility, duty.

What quaint words. Only losers think in these terms. Those who do take their responsibilities seriously are punished in stunning and profound ways, the political/sociological/economic paradigm rewards sharks, liars, thieves and the narcissist. Until there are real, sudden, profound and unmistakable consequences for what were once considered bad behavior, we will only continue to BREED this behavior. Those so academic to miss the raging fire in the forest while the 'leadership' of sharks get fatter on their undue influence and their contempt for everyone but themselves..

I see leadership now as a extension of narcissistic sharks; while they continue to cook the books, issue soothing words and try to tell everyone the economy is recovering. Now the question is when, not if, the reality overtakes them and what replaces the vacuum of real leadership with the qualities you speak of and ways of rewarding those qualities rather than punishing them.

chapel_of_words wrote:

I'm not sure you understand why shepherds are out there. It's not for the long term health of the sheep.

Give me a little more credit please. As an absent minded philosopher, I have pondered the state of mankind for many a year. There was a reason the philosopher king was separated from they merchant class by an elite military guard. Models of society always come back to pyramids. But if there is not a buffer class between the capstone and the merchants, that looks out for the base....it all crumbles. City-states by nature are parasitic...the point is you must balance the wealth extracted from the poor and what you give them in return, without killing them. Merchants have always been greedy and short-sighted in their goals...you have to place barriers in their path, else the only truly equitable state of anarchy will prevail.

Nanoo-Nanoo wrote:

What quaint words. Only losers think in these terms.

Thanks, I needed that! Good thing I don't look to others for self-validation. I do tilt at windmills, I must admit, not quite ready to look into the shiny shield and see my loser self. Wink

Vonbek777 wrote:

There was a reason the philosopher king was separated from they merchant class by an elite military guard. Models of society always come back to pyramids. But if there is not a buffer class between the capstone that looks out from the base....it all crumbles. City-states by nature are parasitic...the point is you must balance the wealth extracted from the poor and what you give them in return, without killing them. Merchants have always been greedy and short-sighted in their goals...you have to place barriers in their path, else the only truly equitable state of anarchy will prevail.

Sorry, the allegory of the cave was bout the only worthwhile thing to come out of that dialogue. I'll go back to one of my favorite quotes from a political philosopher I admire:

Many men have imagined republics and principalities that never existed at all. Yet the way men live is so far removed from the way they ought to live that anyone who abandons what is for what should be pursues his downfall rather than his preservation.

Wolves and shephards alike ultimately just view sheep as a food source; their moral context for doing so is entirely irrelevant to the sheep. It's only the shephard who bothers to moralize their predatory aspect into some higher calling, and once having justified it in their own mind, never gives it a second thought. The problem with most philosophical political constructs is they don't account for the introduction of human defects over time, and so lack a built in error-correction system that is robust enough to identify, overcome, and eliminate the defects. Instead they rely on vague promises of "sufficient enlightenment" to get by. Philosopher kings and elite guards are only separated from absolute tyrants and palace guards by, maybe, three generations. Given the span of human history that's a blip on the radar for a measure of success. Our current system is riddled with defects, but it's overcome defects in the past. It remains to be seen over time whether the soft defect-correcting systems (politics) or hard defect-correcting systems (economics) will prove robust enough to fix the defects.

chapel_of_words wrote:

Utilities are not fixed, they are variable. Ours rarely top $100/month, even in the summer heat of Georgia. You don't need an expensive internet/cable package of $100 (we get by on $25/month).You don't need two $400/month leased cars, buy used ones for a fraction of the cost, own them outright and save that money.

Utilities including power, water, garbage, sewer? Auto was 200/month each - even if you outright purchase a cheap used car, those are about the low end for expenses for maintenance. Or you can take the bus for $100.

Tell me COW, are you managing a household of 4 for $50K gross?

Good retort, but detail me a system that isn't designed to feed off the poor? Entropy rules...my shepherds may be delusional, but they are conditioned to be that way... to serve a purpose...a system of beliefs. The only exception I see is a permanent frontier...low population with plenty of resources gives you glimpse of heaven...but it never lasts, and as history has shown, there are costs associated with it as well.

Sippn wrote:
Utilities including power, water, garbage, sewer?

Yes, yes, yes and yes. We pay more in customer fees and fixed charges than the variable rate per unit total on most of those. But I'll give you $150 (meet halfway).

Auto was 200/month each - even if you outright purchase a cheap used car, those are about the low end for expenses for maintenance. Or you can take the bus for $100.

Cheap used cars are $1k a piece. Drive 'em until they fall apart and pick up another. Do that for three years, even if you have to replace a car a year, and you've saved $4.2K from your $200/month per car, less if you take out gas and maintenance (which I'm not sure if the original article was including). Then again on the $1k price range you tend not to pay a lot in heavy maintenance, just get the next one. We have three vehicles now none were over $5k in cost, and one's a 2000 SUV with only 80k miles on it. Time spent shopping can really bring the cost of a car down, especially on used.

*Tell me COW, are you managing a household of 4 for $50K gross? *

Right now? No. But back then (laid off in 2003 at tail end of tech bust), yes I was, and on two retail salaries that were well under $50k combined. My wife was working three retail shifts and making less than $30k, I was going back to school (so you can add in school bills) while working PT and watching kids. And don't even get me started on the quoted $800 monthly grocery bill, that's $26/day to feed four people. You could easily do it on half that without sweating, maybe a quarter if you work at it and after some practice (believe it or not, getting good at not spending money takes some practice). The ones who really work at it, could do it for an 1/8th.

Even now, we still spend less (by at least half) monthly than many of our friends/peers who make less than we do. Like I said, when you learn the habits in hard times, and keep them in better times, it makes for a vast improvement overall.

Any other qualifications I need to pass for you?

Vonbek777 wrote:
*Good retort, but detail me a system that isn't designed to feed off the poor? Entropy rules...my shepherds may be delusional, but they are conditioned to be that way... to serve a purpose...a system of beliefs. The only exception I see is a permanent frontier...low population with plenty of resources gives you glimpse of heaven...but it never lasts, and as history has shown, there are costs associated with it as well. *

I think you've mistaken systems that feed off poor, with one that keeps them poor, and having thus equated them failed to distinguish between the variable of time. If the poor have the freedom to change their condition, and the rich have the ability to become poor as a consequence of their own folly; then yes the system will still feed off the "poor", but the "poor" is not a structural entrenched underclass caste.

For all it's flaws, our own system has an incredibly high wealth mobility rate in terms of generational shift, I'll have to look through the reports (you can find them in income mobility), but there's a significant portion of the poorest quintile who can get into the top 3 quintiles over a lifetime, and a suprisingly high amount of churn even in the highest quintile (who go back down). So even though there are quintiles of wealth, it's not static. Your entropy fear is for a system that doesn't have internal change or churn.

And I agree with open frontiers being a great safety valve, but until underwater or deep space colonization takes off, we'll have to look to the systems we have.

Login or register to post comments
Syndicate content