Dallas Fed: Comparing 2001 to 2006

Looks like the bears are once again betting the cave on “the tapped out consumer”.

the worrying thing is the durables number vs the biz investment in equipment and software trend...it wont just be a slump in manufacturing jobs.

It is still debatable how fast the construction related jobs will peel off...could be 75k a month, but Im betting on 30-50k a month over a more extended period. But it is hard to tell given the steep drop in residential investment. Its going to depend in part on what expect builders pull back, given that they have to build to stay in business, combined with the issue of the surety bonds, and what they might lose that way by not finishing all the stuff that is under way.

Either way you look at it, we're cooked.

In re durables, they have been punk for two months in a row now, at least by the number about which I care, capital goods orders excluding defense and aircraft.

In re: permabears, huh? Cap goods orders ex-def/air, for example, were over 5% YoY for 26 of 30 months. Whom did that make bearish? You?

Amato, the old saying is "Never bet against the American consumer". And Koenig's analysis shows the American consumer is still spending on the service side (while everything else goes in the tank). Said another way, the spillover from housing has hit over thing but service consumption - but PCE on service is far away the largest component of GDP, so I guess it's still OK to say the spillover has been limited so far. Until the housing slump hits service PCE, the expansion will probably continue.

Best to all.

Econobrowser's Menzie Chinn has a post identifying the revisions on nonresidential investment that lag the residential component.

The capital spending is a concern and certainly worth keeping an eye on, but the weak numbers are not only exclusive to periods prior to recessions. Given that employment remains healthy, it may prove to be temporary. If businesses were really worried, I suspect we'd be seeing layoffs accelerating, as we did prior to the 2001 recession. If that starts happens, then I think it's time to be worried.

CR, so why are new unemployment claims still so low?

True Steve, there are periods when business overbuild a bit, then there is a slump while things readjust and inventories are pared back. But take a look at the context of when those happen. The context now is that we had a period of excess inventory that was a lead in to much of the rest of the economy falling apart, so I see nothing that is going to tell businesses that it is time to start planning for higher demand. You can read this in the CFO confidence numbers, and once they see the q1 consumption numbers, which arent looking nearly as good as the q4 (of which the goodness is debatable) it will really be ratchet back time, and that is when the ratcheting will start to show up in layoffs, which, if you recall, are the last thing firms shed seeing as you can do lots of things to rein in production that are easy to rebuild, but not the workforce. That comes when you've given up hope for recovery and then things really get rolling. Id say we arent far from that point.

Tanta, if you are around could you comment on this?

Mortgage Grapevine: Fannie Mae LOVES Subprime 

I'm doing away with subprime for the most part. Fannie Mae DO approves everything these days. Just got a 100% purchase approved with a 509 mid score. Guy has $4,800 in collections that don't have to be paid, and one valid tradleline. He has Zero, yes ZERO verfied reserves. DTI's are only like 38%, but subprime lenders didn't even want this loan at 80 LTV. It's approved EA2, which means I'm getting him like 8% on a 30 year fixed, no prepay (3 Points YSP!!!). 2 months reserves would get him to an EA1. The MI is high at $500/month but my client is just happy to get a zero down loan! If you are a broker/loan officer that isn't using DO/LP, you are losing out on a lot of $$$$.
by paulyedward1 March 29, 2007

CR,

From the WSJ

However, as the housing and auto slumps have deepened while business spending has started to wane, economists are taking another whack at their GDP forecasts. Earlier this month, the consensus estimate of economists surveyed by The Wall Street Journal called for GDP to grow about 2.3% in the first quarter, down from an estimate of 2.5% a month earlier. The forecast for the second quarter was unchanged at 2.4%

A bunch of the interviewed guys are in the mid 1's.

Economists Cut Back Forecasts for Growth - WSJ.com

A. Flemming

Am I reading this right. The borrower will pay 4% for insurance on top of 8% interest???? If this loan goes through it reinforces my point about price rationing instead of non-price rationing. Fannie is covered - 35% insurance. And if house prices rose at all (likely in almost all circumstances but the present) the insurer would be covered. With a 30% probability of foreclosure it would take only a little over 2.5 years of payments to cover the loss.

With 5% down ($7,000) the borrower would probably save a couple of thousand a year in interest and insurance, and get the $7,000 back when he sells. You really have to wonder about the borrower here.

OCRenter2, I don't know. It's possible (and it's happened before) that unemployment claims will not increase until a recession has started. In a business led recession (like 2001), unemployment claims definitely increased before the recession. But if you look at the recessions that started in Dec '69 and Nov '73, claims didn't lead.

Once again, I don't know. If weekly claims get to 350K (maybe 360K), I'll definitely be concerned. But a recession could start before the claims really increase. It's a marginal indicator.

Banker, thanks for the WSJ story!

Best to all.

Here's a comment from Fleming's link:

That MI is a pure nosebleed though. I hope they are in a decently appreciating housing area and you can get them out of the MI soon.

Time to start the NOD watch.

This is a really excellent analysis.

Well... to be fair let's highlight two of the most important "reassuring differences" that are routinely overlooked:

1) In 2001 the U.S. personal savings rate clocked in at a shameful 2%. It's worth noting that since then U.S. consumers have come to understand the depressive effect that saving has on the aggregate economy. Reassuringly they've rectified their ways with a decisively negative savings rate (close to -1.75%) in recent months.

2) In 2001 consumer debt peaked at a harrowing 105% of income. Again, U.S. consumers rapidly came to terms with the looming deficiency implicit in these anemic debt burdens and increased their DTI ratios accordingly (approaching 130% in recent months).

So alas, I sympathize with Mr. Koenig... anyone who doesn't come to a similar conclusion is a sad case indeed.

Here's a comment from the original commenter at broker universe:

Bernanke is already proposing to get involved to tighten up Fannie and Freddie but until then....

Sounds like the shysters have been loving Fannie and Freddie during the boom.

The squeeze is on the economy, it is effecting those out of favor right now. How does the economy incorporate a threefold increase in transportation energy costs without some type of contraction? I suppose loose credit and a printing press will suffice, until something goes bust. Some sectors are suffering.

This stone age minded layman economist cannot understand mortgages 10 times the borrowers income having any chance of being paid by the borrower.

Again, when the terms of the loan are too complex to understand by the average layman, then that is a loan that should not be made to the average homeowner/borrower nor should that homeowner/borrower sign their economic life away.

"How will the FED be able to reduce rates without the Dollar Devaluation?"

The BoJ and Ministry of Finance in Japan will soon orchestrate a PEARL HARBOR on those long the Carry Trade(Long GBP, EUR, AUD, CHINA, all emerging market debt) and short the YEN. In other words,the YEN will strenghten to the dollar and VASTLY STRENGHTEN relative other currencies.

This is a global phenomena that could force the FED in sympathy to reduce the Funds rate 200 BPS. Raise your cash levels now and BUY YEN!

This will perhaps unfold as leg 1 next quarter. YEN strenghtens and world equities plummet. Our USA flood in liquidity and asset inflation has been propagated by the FED and the BoJ's cheap YEN; however, the cheap YEN is coming to an END as it will be repatriated back into Japan debt and equity markets.

The unwinding of wave 1 & 3 of the YEN carry trade could push the DOW to 8800 and US bonds flight to safety rally in the 123's (3.5%)

Why jobs are not falling? It's too early. Many firms have more workers than they really need, but laying-off and then hiring again is extremely expensive. They rather pay some folks to be rather underloaded...

When recession officially hits - they will fire everybody in 3 months.

A couple of notes about the Payroll stats. Those illegal aliens butchering the cows in Omaha were part of the 1M benchmark correction last Dec. The workers that replaced them were not only paid better but were counted. Those other illegal aliens in the construction industry may not have been fully accounted for by this tax receipts process, so no accurate registry of the actual residential construction jobs.
12M undocumented workers can make any attempt at accurate employment stats a bit of a hoot.

thanks for repeating my sentiment theroxylandr

bofiz, thanks for the link to the al Jazeera piece.

calmo, thanks for the alert on Menzie's piece.

Along with Koenig's article, a lot of interesting stuff to digest today.

Citibank report on CapEx, Mitchell Herd Mar 28:

Watch Capital Spending – It’s Not
Looking So Good


More important, orders for core capital goods (that’s nondefense capital goods excluding aircraft) fell another
1.2% last month following a downward-revised 7.4% drop in January. Assume no change in March, and
nominal orders would be down more than 22% annualized for the first quarter. Core capital goods shipments,
the data, which goes directly into the calculation of GDP, rose 1.2% in February following a 3.3% January fall.
Again, assume no change in March, and nominal shipments would be down a whopping 8.8%, annualized, in
the quarter -- that’s very weak. And keep in mind that the size of the nonresidential fixed investment sector of
the economy is about double that of the residential sector, where most of the economic growth fears still lie.

Another sector to report on: Semiconductor sales are down. Chipmakers have been calling a bottom the same as Home Builders.

- Herb Greenberg - MarketWatch

mikail: I've been thinking I need to move dollars into Japanese Yen. How does one go about it? Also, I don't understand how rising Yen, falling dollar could lead to interest rate drops in the US - wouldn't it be more likely that interest rates would have to rise here?

NYT piece on foreclosures:

ECONOMIC SCENE; 'Irresponsible' Mortgages Have Opened Doors to Many of the Excluded - NY Times

"The latest numbers show that foreclosures have been concentrated not in places where real estate bubbles have supposedly been popping, but rather in places whose economies have stagnated — the hurricane-torn communities on the Gulf of Mexico and the industrial Midwest states like Ohio, Michigan and Indiana, where the domestic auto industry has suffered."

On the way up, the National Home Building Association boasts how it creates 2.5 jobs for one year for every building permit (one job in construction and 1.5 in associated businesses).
It is also an industry rule of thumb that one new job can buy one new home. A positive spiral in housing construction results on the up cycle as housing permits create jobs that buy the product they are building.

If the number of new jobs equals the number of building permits in a market area, then the area is considered to be in balance.

Most people I have read on the employment effect of housing, seem to miss the magnitude of the negative spiral on the down cycle. (one less permit = 2.5 less jobs = 2.5 less homes purchased and maybe 2.5 existing homes for sale)
A decrease of 1,000,000 starts will mean 2.5 million less jobs and 2.5 million less buyers.

That NYT observation may be true. But the notable foreclosure growth rates are in bubble areas. Those markets are joining the party a little later, but they have a lot more to give, in terms of price drops as that's where the risky high balance loans are concentrated...

"Amato, the old saying is "Never bet against the American consumer". And Koenig's analysis shows the American consumer is still spending on the service side (while everything else goes in the tank)."

People will continue to buy their daily lattes, go out for lunch, visit the theater, employ gardeners and housekeepers, get their nails done and visit day spas, and book trips as long as the money keeps coming in. Although in the aggregate these purchases are significant, individually they don't seem excessive to the consumer who doesn't budget assiduously. So this kind of economic activity is very durable.

But given rising unemployment and/or the fear of it, purchae of services can drop like a rock. It's the easiest thing for the consumer to cut. And it's a big hunk of the economy.

To move money into YEN (which is what I did yesterday) : you can buy an ETF called FXY.

also look at UDN.

People will continue to buy their daily lattes, go out for lunch, visit the theater, employ gardeners and housekeepers, get their nails done and visit day spas, and book trips as long as the money keeps coming in. Although in the aggregate these purchases are significant, individually they don't seem excessive to the consumer who doesn't budget assiduously. So this kind of economic activity is very durable.

This seems like pure wishful thinking. Instead you have to imagine a person who sees themself as having a certain wealth who may never have refinanced who may have other investments........and bit by bit all the wealth they think they have is declining in value. They will perceive themselves as becoming poorer. Expensive spending will be delayed until they feel richer. How can it be otherwise??

"Never bet against the American consumer" - years ago it was good jobs, strong dollar.

The jobs are partly gone.
The dollar in decline.

The American consumer exchanged all that for appriciating R/E and HELOC money.

where is consumption going to come from ?

where is liquidity going to come from ?

It is not enough to point out the demand ina childish way ("I want moer") - one has to show the resources that will be used to make the "want" into a "economic demand".

The american consumer have for years stopped saving. Saving is an engine for future growth. Now is the future.

Is this possible ?

"return to normalcy next quarter":

http://www.fresnobee.com/170/story/38264.html

And now, it is Liquidity based home prices that need to set the wages -

"over the last few years, incomes did not move up with home prices"

Permits for homes decrease - DailyBulletin.com

Reference yen carry trade:

mikail: I don't understand how rising Yen, falling dollar could lead to interest rate drops in the US - wouldn't it be more likely that interest rates would have to rise here?
bofizz

Bofizz, mikail's (an interesting name, btw, Russian intelligence is calling an American invasion of Iran for a week from today) analysis is slightly subtle.

He is saying that when the yen carry trade unwinds, the stock market will collapse, but those people lucky enough to get out of the market with portions of their skin intact and those with money to invest will flock to the American bond market.

Now, you are implicitly pointing out that the thing that has inverted the yield curve is the yen carry trade. And you are right. So, when it unwinds the long yields should go up.

mikail is saying that though that may be true, anyone with money to put anywhere is going to put it in American govt. bonds.

Personally, I think he's wrong. I think that foreign bonds will go up (and yields fall) without question, but I think that Treasuries will suffer horribly.

But I also completely disagree that the Japanese Finance Ministry is going to float the yen. That would be a particularly (forgive me) horrific form of hari kari. For starters, it would destroy the Japanese export economy. And, almost unquestionably, the Chinese export economy.

What I am struck by, is that if one of the Spanish-surnamed Americans who figure so prominently in analyses of the housing crisis were to call a broker at Merrill Lynch and say, "Look I want to go long on Dell this afternoon. I'll put up $5,000 and borrow $500,000," the click would come before they could complete the last "thousand".

But, the same SSA can call a mortgage broker and not even have to put up the $5,000 to buy the house.

In other words, the amount of leverage in the housing market makes 1929 look like a sunny day in a petting zoo.

And if the thing driving "consumption" is debt, well, c'mon, how does that work, to quote CR?

AEI - Mortgage Credit and Subprime Lending: Implications of a Deflating Bubble

The video of the conference and Q&A is now posted (thanks to BOT2 for the link)

arbogast,

This workd because unlike stocks Real-estate has two qualities:

  1. It never goes down
  2. It generate income (from renters)

Stocks can go down and they don't generate income....

and more seriously:

I just went 20% YEN but I have the feeling that everyone wants still to keep the YEN stable at 0.85 (or 117.6) for a long tme.

they are willing to let the hedge funds make money from shorting YEN and investing in US gov't bonds as long as world commerace continues: Both US and Japan have the same goal:

Japan keeps producing cars electronics etc...
US keeps borrowing and using the money to buy goods.

No how long can this go on ..... ????? I think for a very long time.

The bear market is now upon us. An initial temptation is to go "ahead of the bear" and pick the down. Don't ; bottoms are fair more stable and far easier to pick than ups, you can wait six months on a low k cycle and still not be hurt too much (no evidence supplied - contradictions welcome)

Amato,

Its a bit of a fallacy to say the consumer is holding up the U.S. economy. In reality the consumer is the CAUSE of the current slowdown.

What are the two biggest-ticket durable items that a consumer purchases? Cars and homes. It is their recent deferral of those purchases -- normal behavior during retrenchment -- that has caused both business fixed investment and residential investment to turn down.

The consumer continues to spend on items that can be easily financed with revolving credit (everything from clothes to plasma TV's). Rather than this being a "bulwark" against recession, its easy to view it as merely the next shoe to drop given dependence on MEW for paying down credit cards.

The bulls say rising incomes make up for lost MEW in paying down cc's. This may be true quantitatively (income gains = MEW lost), but the distributions don't match up: a 5% hourly raise for a family already stretching to make a credit card payment will not substitute for a planned-for $30k MEW windfall.

The bottom line is that the consumer has already started to restrict its spending. Its just that economists choose to look at it on an "ex-cars, ex-housing" basis.

From the NY Times subprime commentary:

"The latest numbers show that foreclosures have been concentrated not in places where real estate bubbles have supposedly been popping, but rather in places whose economies have stagnated ..."

What latest numbers and whose are they? Notice how that info is missing from this commentary -- also note how the author of it, an advocate for keeping the subprime spigot on, cherrypicks stats from the Center for Responsible Lending. Here's a better one - from the Daily News story on the doubling of subprime foreclosures in NYC:

"Industry defenders say subprime loans have democratized credit and given millions of people an opportunity at home ownership.

But the nonprofit Center For Responsible Lending challenged that claim in a report it released yesterday.

From 1998 to 2006, subprime lending enabled 1.44 million people to become first-time homeowners - but it led to 2.37 million foreclosures, a net loss of nearly 1 million, the center reported."

Which makes me gag at the NYT opinionator's last line:

"For be it ever so humble, there really is no place like home, even if it does come with a balloon payment mortgage."

David Pearson

Its a bit of a fallacy to say the consumer is holding up the U.S. economy. In reality the consumer is the CAUSE of the current slowdown

???? You cannot be serious? The US is more or less the only consumption based economy in the world. How does the consumer consume? He borrows money and earns money. Where does he work? Mainly in a business that relies on people like him in the local economy to spend money.

Healthy economies produce rather than consume. Stimulating consumption must be the oldest trick in the book to get a stagnant economy moving again, but without production it aint gonna go anywhere fast.

The US economy is like a field of cows where the cows drink nearly all of their own milk to stay healthy but just cant find enuf grass to stop this cycle. It will only work for so long.

FEDERAL RESERVE BANK OF SAN FRANCISCO
WORKING PAPER SERIES
The views in this paper are solely the responsibility of the author and should not be
interpreted as reflecting the views of the Federal Reserve Bank of San Francisco or the
Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System.
Innovations in Mortgage Markets and
Increased Spending on Housing
Mark S. Doms
Federal Reserve Bank of San Francisco
John Krainer
Federal Reserve Bank of San Francisco
February 2007
http://www.frbsf.org/publications/economics/papers/2007/wp07-05bk.pdf
I found the above paper at the SF Fed. I found it interesting because

  1. It shows the amount of MBS in private conduits
  2. Increase in homeownership
  3. Employment increase in Mortgage sector (though less steep a curve than you would expect due to to automation of the process)
  4. Effect on ex-consumption (consumption expenditures go down) for home ownership.

My personal belief is that it is going to be mighty hard for the consumer to continue swinging. And, we all know that we can shop for and find a learned opinion that speaks to our concern.

Some might finding it interesting. There's much to be gleaned from some of these working papers, though I profess that the formulas lose me more often than not.

Milk Prices Expected to Rise 9 Percent

Costs have surged for fuel and petroleum-based products and for the corn used to feed dairy cows, a side effect of increases in the production of ethanol.

Bower said he now pays about $180 a ton to feed his 500 dairy cows, up from $115 a ton a year ago, an increase of more than 50 percent.

My Way - Money
Nope, no inflation here.

That San Fransico Fed paper

http://www.frbsf.org/publications/economics/papers/2007/wp07-05bk.pdf

The Abstract begins with:

"Over the past several decades innovations in the mortgage market have benefited consumers through a variety of channels. Innovations include the lowering of down payment requirements, increased flexibility in repayment schedules, and the reduction of costs associated with exstracting equity from homes."

Incredible. And whats more this was published last month!!

Yal,

Well, obviously you have "doubts", or else you wouldn't be 20% yen.

There is very certainly a community of purpose between the purveyors of the yen carry trade and the Japanese Finance Industry.

So, left to its own devices, it will continue until the crack of doom.

But the housing meltdown is probably Greenspan's 1929. He dodged the bullet after dotcom, and he got out of the hot seat, but I think his legacy is about to become a ton more tarnished.

I think the unemployment numbers beg some analysis. This is strictly anecdotal, but I know that here in the Midwest the number of (questionable) immigrants employed in industries like residential construction and meatpacking is amazingly large. There are small towns in Iowa like the one I grew up in where the school systems are now a majority Hispanic, for instance. A lot of those people are never in the 'system' and simply slip away when the work is not there for them.

Agree whole heartedly with wally on the measurement of unemployment...and with David Pearson against Worried (especially with that last quarter of GDP growth stats showing that PCE contributed more than 100% despite autos subtracting more than 50% off that 'final' 2.5% number) Here Table 2 esp:
BEA: News Release: Gross Domestic Product

Last thing about currency speculation: review BoJ activity leading up to Mar 31 2003 and wonder if arbo is on the right page with the size and nature of CB intervention in a market that trades ~$3T/day.

Login or register to post comments
Syndicate content